Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IRELAND HAS YET to decide on how it will respond to calls from Palestine to be afforded recognition as a state by the United Nations later this month.
A spokesperson for the Department of Foreign Affairs this morning said that the government had yet to formally adopt a position on the matter, saying the government would have to wait until Palestine made a formal proposal before it could respond.
Ireland’s position would be “informed by its longstanding support for the position of Palestinian statehood”, the spokesman said, adding that Ireland’s precise position would depend on the wording of Palestine’s formal proposals.
Palestine has yet to confirm whether it will seek recognition as a full member – a move which can be vetoed by any of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – or whether it will instead seek an upgrade to ‘observer state status’.
The former requires a two-thirds majority of the General Assembly – the body of all member states – to be carried, as well as the veto-free approval of the Security Council, while the latter can be offered by a simple majority.
Foreign affairs minister Eamon Gilmore has previously told the Dáil he supported the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state, but Ireland has so far declined to recognise Palestine as a full state itself.
Ireland upgraded the status of the Palestinian mission to that of a full embassy in January, but explained that it would not recognise Palestine as a sovereign state unless the entirety of the EU was to do so.
The news comes as the New York Times reports attempts from Barack Obama’s administration to delay Palestine’s bid for recognition, hoping to avoid a confrontation on the Security Council.
The US has made it clear to Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas that it would use its Security Council membership to veto a Palestinian request for full membership.
Analysts told the NYT, however, that the US did not have enough support to block any attempt at giving Palestine observer status, upgrading it from its current status as a ‘non-member entity’.
The Obama administration is anxious that the US could appear isolated if it is among a minority of states to vote against either of Palestine’s potential options.
Writing for TheJournal.ie this week, Israel’s ambaassador to Ireland Boaz Modai said Palestine should return to the negotiating table with Israel – saying that the people of Israel, and “the whole world”, was waiting for peace talks to resume.
Palestine’s ambassador Hikmat Ajjuri said recognition of a Palestinian state would be a clear messsage to Israel that it had no valid claim to any parts of Palestinian territory, and that its “colonisation” of Palestinian land was illegal.
Fianna Fáil has previously tabled a Dáil motion which would force Ireland to support Palestine’s bid for statehood, but the motion was removed from the Dáil order paper a day after being tabled.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Boo hoo hoo hoo hoo hoo f****** hoo, so now there average 70,000 per annum wage might be under threat.. Welcome to the real Irish world.
The ESB will stay under state control. This union move is just to get another 10k a year for employees…
Are the ESB workers afraid of efficient working practices? Or of ESB being a competitive company?
Who’d willingly jump off the gravy train
We all know the ESB lads have it handy , new owner means they might have to go and do a bit of work for a change ……. “start the strikes early and get all we can out of the government before they sell ” …………………… all state and semi state bodies are being breastfed by the government —- time for a change in our staple services .
hahaha ESB workers…bye bye to your 4 foreign holidays a year and 70/80.000 salary!!
Well done Gavin Sheridan of TheStory.ie. NAMA will have to crawl further under the rock of secrecy.
Norris has some determination!
Others might call it neck.
Privatisation does not equate with efficiency. It equates with theft, low wages and shit working conditions. Private sector efficiency is bullshit. If there is efficiency it is efficient direction of capital and money to a small cabal of greedy bastards. This is achieved by job losses and effective dismantling of customer service. Wake up you neoliberal automatons they will soon be fucking with your futures too.
I wouldn’t call it neo-liberal to suggest that public-sector spending should have efficient direction of capital. Especially if that capital is paid through our taxes.
have your say