Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE DEPARTMENT OF the Taoiseach will not say whether or not it has changed the way in which records are kept despite Enda Kenny’s repeated claims about the paucity of records in his office related to the bank guarantee five years ago.
Independent TD Stephen Donnelly asked if there had been any changes in the filing and retention of documents in Kenny’s department since the government to came to office recently but his question was not addressed in written answers.
His queries followed the Taoiseach’s repeated comments about the “paucity” of documentation in his Department related to the previous government’s decision to issue a blanket bank guarantee in September 2008.
In answer to a parliamentary question on 16 July, Kenny said that all records and data are held in compliance with Data Protection, Freedom of Information and National Archives legislation.
He added that documents are also held “in compliance with the records management guidelines set out by the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform”.
Donnelly complained to the office of the Ceann Comhairle under Dáil standing orders claiming that the answer did not properly address his question.
Donnelly’s had asked “the Taoiseach further to Parliamentary Question No. 123 of 9 July 2013, the changes in the filing and retention of documents in his Department that have been introduced since this Government came into office.”
In a letter to Donnelly, Ceann Comhairle Sean Barrett stated: “Having considered the matter, I have to inform you that I do not agree with your opinion and therefore cannot take any further action in the matter.”
Donnelly’s office has said he has since been told by the Ceann Comhairle’s office that he did not specifically ask about what type of changes were made therefore it is not incumbent on the Department of the Taoiseach to provide a specific answer.
The Wicklow TD has now submitted a raft of new questions, asking specifically about new protocols, training for staff, new positions, audits, and new IT systems within the Department in the hope of a more informative response.
But this will not be available until the Dáil returns in September.
TheJournal.ie asked the Department of the Taoiseach if record-keeping methods had changed in the department since Enda Kenny came into office but were given an identifiable answer to that given to deputy Donnelly on 16 July.
A statement said: “All records and data, electronic and paper based, held in the Department are maintained in compliance with the provisions of the Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003, the Freedom of Information Acts 1997 and 2003 and the National Archives Act 1986 and in compliance with the records management guidelines set out by the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (DPER).”
The record management guidelines set out by the DPER refer to guidance issued by the Centre for Management and Organisation Development in 2005. This has since been renamed the Office of the Government Chief Information Officer which is a division of DPER, a spokesperson said.
The Government’s Chief Information Officer is Bill McCluggage, appointed in June of this year, who is tasked with devising and implementing a new ICT strategy across the public service.
Like TheJournal.ie Politics on Facebook
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
This just in, people are basically sheep and can be manipulated very easily.
Let me guess… You consider yourself above it all?
‘Mainstream media’ works the same way. It distorts headlines & manipulates people. It often plays on peoples emotions rather than their intellect.
We often read newspapers or online news sites, and taking what we read there as ‘fact’. Most newspapers are far from neutral. We are really reading, is the agendas and opinion of the editorial board, of the news site.
Everything is carefully spun to appear as ‘neutral’.
T.I.M., Install adblock and ghostery and you will be above it it all because you won’t see any of the crap Facebook tries to feed you about “OMG this woman is hated by the beauty industry” and trying to sign you up to Farmville.
The faster people get over their obsession with social media the faster we will grow as a society.
#like
I bet this only works on women.
#sexistbuttrue
Richard – Humans are social by nature. Social media will remain.
“Social” media ironically is anything but social. That’s the problem. It’s a platform for advertising and information gathering.
Social media is social in the context of Internet usage.
Not in the context of human interaction which is what Facebook would have you believe.
I was in a good mood before I read this article!
u ok hun txt me xx don’t mind de begrudgers deyll get what’s cummin’ to dem.
Stopped using Facebook years ago!
Ditto. A very large waste of power, racks, cooling, cabling and servers in my opinion. Not to mention brain power.
“Not having a Facebook account” is the new “I don’t own a TV.”
I don’t think you can compare tv to Facebook.
I wasn’t comparing the two. I was comparing the two statements.
You were comparing by implication.
No I wasn’t.
Yes you were.
No he weren’t.
Yes I wasn’t?
Anyone know what the next big social site will be?
If I knew, I wouldn’t be sharing it!
Pornbook
No different than staggering articles with dubious statistical information over time to sway opinion.
The property prices articles in the journal?
Facebook is the single most destructive force to productivity in the history of mankind. It should be destroyed.
This is a game changer. One-seventh of the world’s population is in the hands of these deviants.
I’ve noticed for some time that the App Sky news has also been ‘introducing’ foreign bits for a while now. They have invariably been from the US and Pakistan. And they have always been about some violent outrage which smacks of the same thing as Facebook.
But Facebook is a very big and frightening machine that can and by the looks of things will be used against us.
Like voting. Protest and survive!
have your say