We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
A TD HAS claimed that introducing a school attendance payment in place of child benefit would save the State between €100 million and €135 million every year.
Denis Naughten has said that abolishing child benefit for school age children and replacing it with a school attendance payment of the same amount – €130 – would achieve savings of between €100 million and €135 million per year.
He claims that over €13 million would be saved by removing the need to pay child benefit to parents who may work in Ireland but whose child or children are in education in other European countries.
“The Irish taxpayer is paying for childcare which is already subvented in other EU countries. We have used child benefit here to provide a subvention for childcare,” he said.
However the Department of Social Protection said that such a proposal would face difficulties at an EU level and said the European Commission indicated it could discriminate against migrant workers.
The Roscommon-based TD said the new payment method would also cut down on fraud and over-claims saving anything between €10.5 million and €36 million a year.
He also factors in the control savings the Department of Social Protection already makes with annual savings of between €75-85 million in recent years.
In addition to this between €4-5 million is sought in over-payments annually with the Department increasingly successfully in reclaiming over-payments having recovered €4 million of €4.8 million that was sought in 2011.
Naughten said that tying the payment to school attendance would also help to address truancy issues and cut down on bureaucracy as it could involve the National Education Welfare Board (NEWB) which is usually informed if a child has missed 20 days or more of school.
He said: “The school attendance payment would be an added incentive for some parents to ensure that their child has a full attendance at school.
“Such a payment would be the most effective way to address the problem of school drop-outs, without incurring a vast administration cost as the reporting structure [the NEWB] is already in place.”
The Department of Social Protection said Naughten’s proposals would represent a “considerable departure from the existing policy and would have to be justified in terms of better outcomes”.
The Department also said it implementing the proposal would “entail administrative and logistical challenges” and said a more detailed proposal would be needed in order for the measure to be properly copsted.
Naughten told TheJournal.ie that the Department of Social Protection had dismissed his proposal on the grounds that it would take the administration of the payment out of its control and instead give it to the Department of Education.
“I don’t think that that’s right, there are substantial savings to be made by a whole of government approach,” he said adding that he would continue to put the idea to the Minister Joan Burton.
“It does help to deal with truancy issue because it does give parents an incentive to ensure their son or daughter are going to school,” he insisted.
Earlier this year, a long-awaited report by the Advisory Group on Tax and Social Welfare recommended a two-tier system of child benefit which would involve families being mean-tested or being below a certain level of income to qualify for full payment.
The Department added that it has made no decisions on the core recommendations of the report “given the complexities of the issues involved”.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
As per usual, Minister Ross is off partying with his feather boa and is nowhere to be seen other than on some Z-Lister’s Instagram page. They wouldn’t stand for this on the continent
@Bertie Was Great: they wouldn’t stand for a “mechanical fault” of the continent !!!….
@old fecker: A certain Mr Hitler eradicated those alright.
Let’s be fair to the Minister…. he could be at a ‘boa’rd meeting…
@Sean Callan: the only way to resolve the issue is to sack a few of the maintenance staff who are responsible for the upkeep of the fleet. You can rest assured that the vast majority of these staff are on extended coffee breaks most of the day giving out about how they are not paid enough for drinking coffee. Not an easy task due to the solidarity of their comrades etc etc. Ransom specialists is all they are.
@Bertie Was Great: Not an employee, work for myself, and I am currently on holidays, which are of course, in my case, ‘unpaid’ (just using that word to help you understand). Congrats, you are 100% incorrect, 100%.
@Bewarethebeardz: Being on the dole is not the same as working for yourself. Some of us are flat out this week keeping the fledgling economy afloat! 100%
@Bertie Was Great: Just so we are clear, I’ve been working since i was 16 either for myself or as an employee. I’ve been lucky enough to have never needed the dole. And no, I have never received any handouts from anyone.
have your say