Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Updated 22.00
WICKLOW COUNTY COUNCIL has been fined €355,000 today in connection with the death of two firemen in Bray in 2007.
Judge Des Hogan said that it appeared to him that the system used by Wicklow County Council was flawed.
Judge Hogan order the council to pay additional costs of €95,793.32. The maximum possible fine could have been up to €3 million.
Disbelief in court
The reaction in the court was one of disbelieve, said a source. Once the fine had been read out in court, the families of the deceased got up and left the court, with a source stating that they were not happy “at all” with the fine.
Earlier this year, the local authority pleaded guilty to three out of four charges related to the death of 25-year-old Mark O’Shaughnessy and 46-year-old Brian Murray, who died when the roof of a disused building collapsed on them as they fought a blaze in a disused building in Bray.
In a statement, Wicklow County Council said that they “accepted that there were breaches in a number of systems of work in the operation of its Fire Services between 2005 and 2007″.
They state that the “amended indictment importantly acknowledged that the deaths of Sub-Officer Brian Murray and Firefighter Mark O’Shaughnessy while fighting a fire in Bray in September 2007 were not as a consequence of the breaches of the Act of 2005″. They added:
The Council understands and is sensitive to the distress caused during the course of the hearing. However, the immediate acceptance of the amended indictment facilitated the trial being brought to a close at the earliest possible date.Wicklow County Council again extends its deepest sympathy to the families of the deceased men – two dedicated and brave firefighters who tragically lost their lives in the incident.
The Council has since addressed all of the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work issues raised by the case.
Irish Fire and Emergency Services Association
Following the conviction and sentencing of Wicklow County Council today, the National Chairman of the Irish Fire and Emergency Services Association (IFESA), John Kidd said the IFESA welcomed the outcome of the trial and hoped it would bring some relief to the family and friends of the two men seven years after the tragedy.
The council faced three charges under the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005 and were brought against them by the Health and Safety Authority. The charges related to the local autohorities failure to ensure the safety of the firefighters which resulted in injury to them, the safety of the equipment they used, a lack of proper risk assessment and a lack of training.
Before pleading guilty to the charges, the council had pleaded not guilty but later changed their plea.
Mr Kidd said the attitude of Wicklow County Council since the tragedy and up until it pleaded guilty to criminal health and safety violations, was “deeply disturbing and had added enormously to the trauma and grief of the deceased firefighters families’, friends and colleagues”.
‘Shameful’
“While IFESA has the highest praise for the actions of the gardaí and Health and Safety Authority in trying to get to the causes of this tragedy, the behaviour of Wicklow County Council and senior officials there, has been nothing less than shameful,” he said, adding:
From day one there has been a concerted policy by the council to deny all liability for the deaths of Brian and Mark until the harrowing evidence emerging at the trial left the council with no option but to admit a guilty plea.The attitude of the council to these two men, who laid down their lives in public duty, has been chilling and there are serious questions to be asked about the strategy followed by the council and who authorised it.
When the case was first raised, there was much unease amongst Wicklow councillors and council management who feared that people could be charged as individuals in the case.
However, it was decided that the Wicklow County Council would be charged as a corporate body.
Council’s finances
There was speculation that the council could face a maximum fine of €3 million, which was cause for concern due to the council’s finances. For the end of 2012, figures shows that the council’s long term capital debt amounted to €117.5 million. There closing debit balance on their operating account, which covers everyday expenses, stands at €1, 995, 147.
Mr Kidd said IFESA was calling on the Health and Safety Authority to conduct a special report into the fire service nationally as provided for under mechanisms under the , Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005.
Originally published at 15.30pm
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Oh great. Now we’ll be hearing from all the armchair experts with blindingly simple solutions that the programmers didn’t think of because they were too busy eating their liga and colouring in with their crayons. I can’t wait.
@8bitplebian: I don’t eat liga when I’m coding lol
@Scorpionvenomm: Sorry, Farley’s.
They should turn it off and on again
“British Airways HAVE apologised to ITS customers…”
@Harry Whitehead: British Airways is the name of the company, singular. The airways themselves haven’t actually apologised.
If you are going to be pedantic, at least be right.
@Michael Doyle: If British Airways is to be treated as a singular noun, the correct verbal agreement would be HAS, not HAVE. Try reading it again.
@Harry Whitehead: Exactly. That’s why your original correction was incorrect.
My heads hurt.
@Neal Ireland Hello.: Err…mine wasn’t a correction. I was directly quoting the article. I used capitals to highlight the mistake. Either ‘has + its’ or ‘have + their’.
@Harry Whitehead: Lol, show how much the Irish care about the stranded passengers
@Harry Whitehead: maybe the article has been fixed since you read it first. Further down I do see “British Airways say” , which is conflicting.
@Michael Doyle: Yeah you’re right, it’s been fixed.
@Harry Whitehead: That explains it. Now we can get back to worrying about the group of passengers that are/is stranded.
@Michael Doyle: *WORRY WORRY WORRY WORRY WORRY WORRY WORRY…*
@Michael Doyle: Sorry, couldn’t resist.
I’m glad we got to the bottom of this, gentlemen.
There’s some good deals in pc world, maybe they should get down there
Resilience and redundancy plans anyone??
Probably cloud-based….
Look up its an empty sky.
go back to old system with ticketing, technology is weak, all it takes is one system to go down and the hole lot falls down, flights delayed, or cancelled no good to people travelling or missing connecting flights! then they dump you outside the airport to fend for yourself!
@Stephen Finn:
There is a whole lot wrong with that suggestion.
@Nick Allen: and yet you aren’t arsed pointing out exactly what is wrong with it.
I think you will find they were hacked, but not admitting to the fact. It seems impossible that they would have no redundancy or contingency plan if a data centre was struck by lightning.
Hugo Drax involvement I’ll warrant .
The cancellations also hit flights to Heathrow and Gatwick, I’m in Miami and two flights from here today were cancelled. The staff on the desks said nine flights from New York were also cancelled, they were still suffering a lot of computer glitches while trying to transfer us to alternative flights with different airlines. I was in a queue for about 90 minutes and it then took about another 20 minutes for the desk agent to convince his computer to book me onto a new flight.
I somehow read the hashtag as ‘competence outage’.
Word on the street is the Indians screwed up!!!!!!
have your say