Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IRELAND NEEDS TO do more to prosecute and punish corruption more quickly.
That’s the opinion of the European Union who also say that they have concerns about the funding of Irish political parties
The EU Commission today published its first ever report on corruption across the EU and also found that Irish people feel that corruption is more widespread in their country than the average European.
In it’s country-by-country analysis, the report states that “the Irish government has undertaken substantial reforms in its anti-corruption policies”, but highlighted some areas of concern:
However, more work could be done to improve the capacity to prosecute and punish corruption cases in a timely manner. Further work could also be required to address the few remaining concerns around the funding of political parties, election and referendum campaigns and corruption risks related to conflicts of interest at local level, as well as in the area of urban planning.
A survey undertaken as part of the report also found that 81 per cent of Irish people feel that corruption is widespread in their home country. This compares to an EU average of 75 per cent.
Instances of corruption may be less common however, with three per cent of Irish people saying they have been asked or expected to pay a bribe in the past year. This is slightly lower than the EU average of four per cent.
In the chapter relating to Ireland, the report also voiced a number of other specific concerns, saying that the General Scheme of the Lobbying Regulation Bill focused to a greater degree on the responsibilities of lobbyists and to a lesser extent on the public officials.
The chapter also noted the importance of the media in “exposing and following corruption allegations” and made reference to concerns about “the growing consolidation of media ownership”.
EU wide
Overall, European Anti-Corruption Report estimates that corruption costs the EU economy €120 billion each year, saying that integrity in politics also remains an issue for many EU states.
Speaking after its publication, EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmström said that the report “gives a frank assessment of how each member state tackles corruption”.
“The report therefore calls for improvements in a number of different areas,” she added. “In some member states, vulnerability to corruption in public procurement processes is the main problem. In others, political party financing is not transparent enough.”
The report places a specific emphasis on public procurement saying that about one-fifth of the EU’s GDP is spent every year by public entities buying goods, works and services and is an area that is vulnerable to corruption.
Tackling corruption
According to Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams, the EU report “highlights the fact that the government needs to do a lot more tackle corruption in public life”.
He suggested:
The Government needs to take note of the findings in this EU report and act to reassure the public that political corruption, so long a feature of this state will be tackled once and for all.
He also re-emphasised Sinn Féin’s call for a banking inquiry, and said that the party is “concerned that it could be neutered by an overly strict definition of bias that would bar TDs and Senators from taking part.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Is it just me or is the headline a tad ambiguous? I read the headline to mean reasons as to why victims should drop cases rather than reasons as to why the DPP wasn’t proceeding with a prosecution.
Exactly !
The DPP has had her budget cut, while her office has had to deal with more files. Telling complainants (or the emotional loaded term victims) that their evidence wouldn’t be accepted as credible, or that the prosecution would not be in the public interest, is fairly low on the priority list.
Divert some of the funding devoted to defending the criminal ..such as repeated free legal aid and problem solved. Easy !
Now your talking Michael. My 9yr old went through he’ll & back, case wasn’t passed. No reason & no victims support for him. Maybe get rid of flat screen tv’s & state of d art gyms from prisons & put money into DPP or funding for victims support.
That’s crap, they write to tell you case wasn’t passed so surly a couple of more sentences with the reasons as to why would not be costly
have your say