We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
NEW CARS COULD be required to have vehicle-to-vehicle communication systems fitted in as US regulators draft a proposal supporting it.
By using this system, drivers will be alerted if the car senses it’s going to crash into an object or another car. It’s hoped that introducing this system will significantly reduce the rate of accidents and collisions on roads.
Cars will be able to communicate with each other by using short-range radio signals and would be able to exchange vehicle information such as speed, location and the direction they’re travelling.
No date was given for when automakers would need to introduce it or what the cost might be, but US officials aim to have a proposal developed before early 2017. Once the regulations are in place, automakers would be required to put in GPS sensors and software into vehicles.
The US transportation secretary Anthony Foxx said data from a Transportation Department study, which started in 2012, showed that the technology could help prevent 80 per cent of potential accidents from happening.
Both automakers and researcher have been working on developing technology to reduce collisions. While advancements have been made, other systems like developing a network which allows multiple cars to communicate with each other will need to be introduced.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Good idea in theory but it is America we are talking about. Every movement will now be tracked. Welcome to 1984
Not that I’ve anything to hide, but I really wouldn’t like the idea of being tracked – which is obviously the main though unmentioned aim of this idea.
Yeah, this is not a means to reduce accidents, it’s just another way for the American government to track every one of its citizens. Add this information to the data already collected by the NSA and you have a massive, massive privacy issue.
Minority report comes one step closer
Excellent idea. A black box driving recorder in every car should be considered, for download by Gardai in the event of an accident. This technology is well established and would definitely reduce road deaths.
“…..in the event of an accident”.
I think that’s the part that frightens people. Who’ll monitor this? Who has access, and just how stringent are the warrants/judicial oversight?
“Not very stringent” is what I’d imagine.
And, therefore, no. I’d rather it wasn’t introduced.
Let America be America, and hope and pray we don’t follow.
Pity we never ape anything thats good from the USA.Just all its crap.
Two questions are raised here;
1. Will the system actually be safer, we have to take into account how complex will the system be, and how manageable the user interface will be. Most air accident happen when pilots who are highly trained fail to interpret their what the machine is telling them/ get confused. Will this system pose a risk to people who are nervous drivers or aren’t tech savvy.
2. Can the American public actually trust this program to be implemented without an ulterior motive. Given the revelations about the NSA in the past year, I can see this being used as a data gathering/ surveillance exercise
One of them must have watched knight Rider in the 80′s and it only took 30 years for the thought to filter through to the conscious.
muses if you have nothing to hide it shoulld not be a problem. and even if it could save just one liefe its worth it
Bruce Schneier (security/crypto dude) – “Too many wrongly characterize the debate as “security versus privacy.” The real choice is liberty versus control.”
How many lives is our (me and you and everybody else’s) privacy worth? Just one? Ten?
Does the fact I’m even trying to quantify it not highlight something is wrong?
Hmm said by sheep everywhere in potential and actual dictatorships.
So Master M…No problem with the Gaurds,revenue,social welfare, child protection agencies and Ruhama showing up at your door at 3AM.They can go thru your fies,private and personal papers,your fridge, bottom sock drawer.question your family without you present or without any legal counsel or warrent with no specified crime in mind and then maybe charge you with somthing or noy and disapper off again…No problem with that???Well if you do why??You have done nothing so what have you to hide??Ponder on that while you are being carted off to the gulag orEU reeducation center someplace
All you need are strong magnetic bumpers. When they get closer they repel each other.
Simples.
Always wanted to have a ships radar in my car. “300 meters ahead and approaching at 60 miles an hour captain” could get annoying on the m50
have your say