Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
ALAN SHATTER IS known to start his days well before 6am and is renowned for his relentless work ethic as a minster who straddles both the Departments of Justice and Defence.
In three years in government he has introduced 24 of the 159 Bills the coalition has brought before the Dáil, is currently bringing forward wide-ranging reforms to the legal sector, and has successfully passed two referendums – one to cut judges’ pay and another to establish a Court of Appeal.
So why, with all these reforms, does he find himself under pressure with calls for his resignation?
The simple answer is that the minister has been at the centre of the two biggest domestic stories in the last fortnight – the GSOC bugging controversy and now fresh revelations from a garda whisteblower.
The common thread is An Garda Siochána with Shatter seemingly now facing a perfect storm of crises that have literally been on the frontpages and at the top of the news bulletins for the last 11 days.
TheJournal.ie explains how it’s got to this stage and what it all means…
The GSOC saga
The Garda Ombudsman (GSOC) surveillance/bugging story is arguably as confusing now as it was when it was first revealed by the Sunday Times two weeks ago. Then, the paper reported that the GSOC’s offices had been placed under surveillance with the use of government-level technology.
Shatter sought to play down these claims and stated, off the back of a briefing from GSOC, that there was “no definitive evidence” of surveillance having taken place.
What kept the story alive was GSOC being less definitive about whether or not they has been spied on and some fairly obvious differences between what they told Shatter in a briefing and what Shatter told the Dáil.
Garda Ombudsman Commissioner Simon O’Brien trying to explain just what went on at his offices to an Oireachtas Committee last week. [Pic: Oireachtas TV]
Added to this were the opposition parties’ calls for an independent inquiry and the lingering suspicion – though denied by GSOC, gardaí and everybody else at official level – that the gardaí or rogue elements within the gardaí were involved in the surveillance.
Then it emerged that there was an innocent explanation for some – if not all – of the anomalies that had been identified in the original Verrimus security sweep of GSOC HQ. This was based on a ‘second opinion’ Shatter sought from an Irish security firm, RITS.
The differences between the RITS and Verrimus assessments, the continued controversy the story was creating in the media and political pressure led Shatter to recommend to his Cabinet colleagues that a former High Court judge review the whole matter.
With that process under way, and barring any new revelations, that story is effectively paused until we have the judge’s report in eight weeks time.
The “extremely serious allegations of garda misconduct”
But now another, more serious problem has arisen for Shatter in the last 24 hours and again concerns the gardaí and a saga that has been rumbling on for the past two years.
Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin claims to have received evidence from the garda whistleblower Maurice McCabe of gardaí having “seriously mishandled” a number of cases involving “abduction, assault and murder”.
Among the cases are that of Sylvia Roche Kelly who was found dead in a Limerick hotel in 2007 and her killer Jerry McGrath who had earlier that year attacked a woman taxi driver, Mary Lynch. Other cases included in the documents concern three separate assault causing harm charges, one false imprisonment and the alleged falsification of garda records.
Martin has given the documentation to the Taoiseach who himself said today there are “extremely serious allegations of garda misconduct” in the files. Enda Kenny said he’s going to deal with it. We’ve yet to hear from the Justice Minister.
Speaking in the Dáil earlier, Martin claimed that Shatter knew about the cases for over two years.
This claim is based on a transcript of a conversation between McCabe and garda confidential recipient Oliver Connolly who, according to the transcript published by Broadsheet.ie, told the whistleblower he passed the documents to Shatter.
Martin said in the Dáil today: “Minister Shatter knew about these shocking cases for two years and in the knowing of these cases he comes into this house and accuses the whistleblower of not co-operating in the penalty points saga – undermining the man’s credibility in the public domain, something I believe was very wrong.”
‘If Shatter thinks you’re screwing him, you’re finished’
Former garda John Wilson at a protest calling for Shatter’s resignation outside Leinster House yesterday. [Pic: Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland]
These claims over the last 24 hours are the latest developments in a long-running saga involving McCabe, a serving sergeant, and another garda whistleblower, the retired John Wilson.
McCabe has now alleged that serious criminal cases were mishandled while both he and Wilson have said for some time that there was widespread malpractice in the fixed charge notice system – essentially that penalty points were being wrongly and corruptly cancelled.
Two years ago this month, McCabe met garda confidential recipient Connolly to discuss his concerns about a number of issues, among them the recommendation by Garda Commissioner Martin Callinan to promote a senior officer who was under investigation.
Appointed by Shatter in June 2011, Connolly was charged with receiving confidential reports of corruption or malpractice within An Garda Síochána from garda members or civilian employees.
As we said above, the full transcript of this conversation has been published by Broadsheet.ie and some of the comments Connolly made to McCabe have been read in to the Dáil record. Connolly is said to have told McCabe:
“I’ll tell you something, Maurice, and this is just personal advice to you. If Shatter thinks you’re screwing him, you’re finished.”
These are remarks which the minister wasn’t able to definitely prove that Connolly had said, but which Connolly apparently wasn’t able to deny he had said, as a result the garda confidential recipient was was sacked yesterday and the office itself has been abolished.
In a statement, Shatter said: “I informed him [Connolly] that in the context of his failure to unequivocally repudiate the content of the alleged conversation or take the necessary action to restore public confidence in the office of Confidential Recipient, I believed his position was untenable and I had no alternative but to relieve him of the position.”
Serving garda sergeant Maurice McCabe arriving at Leinster House last month to give evidence to the PAC in private session - a historic first. [Pic: Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland]
'Ignored... and owed an apology'
In April 2012, two months after he met Connolly, McCabe made a formal complaint through the confidential recipient system but it went nowhere as far as he was concerned.
Feeling ignored by the confidential recipient, by the gardaí, and by the government, McCabe and Wilson brought their concerns to TDs, with Mick Wallace and Clare Daly taking up the case publicly.
McCabe has also given evidence to members of the Public Accounts Committee about cancellation of penalty points and the potential loss of revenue to the State. The PAC's examination of the matter forced Shatter to ask the now-maligned GSOC to investigate the penalty points issue last month.
On the wider penalty points issue, Shatter has accepted the findings of a report into the operation of the fixed charge notice system by Assistant Garda Commissioner John O'Mahoney which largely vindicated the operation of the system when it was published last year.
But the minister went further in his response to the report, claiming that McCabe and Wilson did not cooperate with the internal investigation.
He told the Dáil in October last year: "They didn't cooperate with the garda investigations that took place. Now I don't know why that is... "
McCabe disputes this and Micheál Martin claims it's just not the case that McCabe did not cooperate or offer to do so. He wants Shatter to apologise to the whistleblower.
The questions that need answering
Even with all this, the controversy does not end there for Shatter.
Last May, while appearing on Prime Time to discuss the penalty points saga, the minister revealed that Mick Wallace had been stopped by gardaí for using his phone while driving.
Wallace subsequently complained to SIPO and said Shatter made improper use of confidential information which had been given to him by the Garda Commissioner. Critics say this is an example of too cosy a relationship between Martin Callinan and the Minister.
Martin Callinan and Alan Shatter [Pic: Eamonn Farrell/Photocall Ireland]
But aside from that, most problematic for Shatter right now are these "extremely serious allegations" in the documents that have been with the Taoiseach since yesterday, and which it is claimed Shatter was told about two years ago.
It is clear that Shatter needs to account for what he knew and when he knew it in relation to these documents. Following on from that what did the gardaí know and what do they have to say about the whole issue?
But the two key questions for the minister are: Was he, as is claimed, made aware of the "extremely serious allegations" in the McCabe documents two years ago? And if so, what did he do about them?
And finally, don't forget the politics in all this
Politically, it should not be forgotten that Shatter was a key ally of Kenny's in the attempted Fine Gael heave of June 2010.
Shatter is a key ally for Kenny at Cabinet level. The others are James Reilly and Phil Hogan, both of whom have their own problems with the latter more than likely off to the European Commission in the summer.
But it shouldn't be forgotten that in some ways Shatter is also a key ally for Labour, particularly on various social issues the junior coalition partner has been pushing in government.
Shatter will be leading the arguments on the same-sex adoption bill and will theoretically be front and centre on the same-sex marriage referendum next year. The minister also gave one of the strongest speeches in favour of the abortion legislation last year.
But all that said, Labour won't be afraid to burn Shatter if he becomes politically toxic.
We're not at that stage yet, but if the serious outstanding issues which have emerged over the last 24 hours are not addressed and addressed adequately, be that a statement from Shatter or a full-blown inquiry, then trouble lies ahead for the novel-writing minister.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Let it go….
@HearMeNow33: Are you mad? This will be wall to wall, for a few weeks.
@Tommy Berry: True. Can’t let a chance of some shinner bashing pass them by.
@Seán Óg: says the shinnerbot
@Denis Logan: How predictable of you.
When is the Gardaí report on Charlie Flanagan potential Covid-19 breaches at Colm Horkan funeral
@tirnanog1979: no comparison and you know it
@Jane: Both funerals broke the regulations Jane and you know it.
@tirnanog1979: that would be Detective Garda Colm Horkan.
@Seán Óg: SF could have sent representatives to Mr Storeys funeral as happened with Garda Horkans funeral and I don’t think anyone could have complained. Instead SF attended the funeral en masse, traveling from all over the country to do so and gathered in a graveyard to give a graveside oration where no burial was taking place.
@Jane: Nonsense, they were as bad as each other
@Jane: Both funerals had large crowds and poor social distancing. If you admonish SF for the Storey funeral then surely you must do the same for Garda Horkan’s funeral. Your disliking of SF seems to be clouding your judgement Jane.
@Seán Óg: but only one was attending in very large numbers by political party reps from all over the country. That’s the difference.
Why is it even when SF are obviously wrong no criticism is allowed?
Why do ye want to replace a crowd that dodge questions with another crowd that dodge questions?
@Jane: Critism is allowed Jane, but the obvious point you insist on ignoring, is that critism is selective and hypocritical. As was pointed out, you cant criticise one and not the other – but in your case, you did just that.
To me, both were wrong. It would seem, that to you, there is only political captital to be made from criticising one.
@tirnanog1979: It ill behooves Shinners to comment on any Garda’s funeral —–They were responsible for quite a few in their time and indeed have been known to give rapturous acclaim to certain Garda’s murderers.
@Angela McCarthy: and you are ignoring the involvement of a political party in only one of the funerals. A political party that was involved in the making of the rules for everyone else in that jurisdiction.
@Jane: A political party? dont you mean political parties, as more than one seems to be set on debating it. but not the other.
@Angela McCarthy: not sure what you mean by that Angela. Only one party is in bother over it because only one party attended en masse. Bringing a crowd to the graveyard unnecessarily was just ridiculous.
Everyone understands that Bobby Storey was an important figure in SF and as such no one would have batted an eyelid if some of the senior politicians in SF had attended as was done with Garda Horkans funeral.
@Jane: Where did I say no criticism is allowed? People attending both funerals broke government guidelines. So don’t cherry pick your outrage Jane. Call a spade a spade.
@Seán Óg: tell you what Sean you just continue to ignore what are the obvious differences between them as I’ve pointed out above. And continue to be outraged at all and any criticism leveled at SF.
@Jane: I have criticised SF over the attendance of Bobby’s funeral. Because it was wrong to stage a funeral with those numbers in attendance. But you ignore the fact that large numbers attended the Garda’s funeral, including some politicians. Same rules for everyone Jane.
One rule for that crowd, Sur they are the “law” 8 cremations the same day and no one allowed .
@Ger Murray: who’s that crowd ?.
@Airwave81: The uniformed woman and men that lined the streets
Clear the decks, Nolan show can’t wait to ramp up the whole funeral again, rest in peace Big Bobby, a giant among men.
now could they start investigating collusion with he uvf
The usual crowd talking about people in uniforms blah, blah, blah. What I saw were people in ordinary clothes coming out to see a true republican being laid yo rest, with a quarter of a million watching online which Sinn Féin Féin set up. The PSNI have already stated that there were no problems with it. Establishmemt supporters again trying to take away from their parties failure. No bank bailout? Ha ha
Just ticking a box… Nothing will happen
have your say