Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IRELAND HAS SUFFERED a lot in recent years. With the retraction of its economy, public morale has fallen and its standing in the world has been tarnished.
However with the recent announcement by the Tanaiste that a review of the Department of Foreign Affairs policies and strategies is to take place, an opportunity has presented itself that would help Ireland regain its reputation as a global player. It has something that cannot be measured in terms of money or bonds; its real standing in the world should be derived from its experience as a nation, and more specifically the experience its public servants have in the area of peace building.
Not wanting to take away from last year’s achievement of being elected to the United Nations Human Rights Council, as it will truly enable Ireland to show on the world stage what it can do and to show that it really knows what is important, there is another branch of the United Nations that Ireland could really contribute to in a dynamic way: this is the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission.
The Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) was created in 2006 to provide the political support for peacebuilding efforts in troubled regions throughout the world by focusing the efforts of the international community on a coherent strategy, and by persuading the actors to work towards the respective strategies aims.
The composition of the PBC allows for the representation of 31 UN member states. Of these 31, seven are elected by the UN General Assembly (much like the election for the Human Rights Council) and Ireland should seek election to it.
Throughout the world, divisions and conflicts exist where Ireland’s Department of Foreign Affairs’ expertise and experience could be used. It will not be able to offer solutions to every problem but will approach it with a solid foundation upon which the peace sought can be built. At its most basic Ireland has two main attributes that can benefit its application for this new role …
History
Ireland has never been the aggressor in any conflict. In the parts of the world where its expertise could be most beneficial eg, Africa, South-East Asia and the Middle East a long-standing mistrust exists between the local governments and the world’s superpowers (rightly or wrongly). Many of the most troubled regions in the world are either former colonies (eg, Burma, Somalia) or are battlegrounds where the Cold War was fought between the superpowers (eg, Korean Peninsula, Afghanistan).
This accusation cannot be levelled at Ireland as it is a country that has been oppressed throughout history and has also remained neutral in all wars since its independence. It has only ever deployed its troops abroad to secure peace in many of these troubled regions. This history of neutrality, commitment to conflict resolution and its non-aggressive international history bode well for the country if an application to the PBC was made.
Experience
The fact that the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs has worked to mediate one of the most volatile peace agreements that has been forged in recent history proves that it has the requisite experience and skills to deal with the problems that may arise throughout peace negotiations. This was the same Government Department that helped draft the Downing Street Declaration, in the turbulent time of the Troubles and only weeks after the Shankill Road Bombing and the Greysteel Attacks took place. That experience is limited in the world and it is highly valued.
Ireland has a wealth of expertise that must surely be tapped before it can no longer be accessed at all. Ireland had – and has – in its public service some of the most capable and admired peacemakers of our time and surely it would do justice to the world that Ireland uses that knowledge to teach others. This expertise was forged through difficult and challenging times, and it is important that before all of these negotiators retire, their knowledge is tapped. What better way to do it than to promote build peace throughout the world?
Ireland has a duty to the world community to partake in such peace-building exercises because it has benefited so much from such interventions as George Mitchell and Richard Haass in its own peace process. Ireland has seen first-hand the benefits a third party can bring to a peace process and it owes it to the forgotten conflicts throughout the world to offer help.
Ireland needs to be measured by something other than its balance sheet. It needs a new role in the world, one that is more substantial than the Celtic Tiger. If Ireland could take a position on the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission, it would be taking the position of global statesman.
Colm Bergin has experience in both politics and public policy having worked in New York, Brussels and Washington DC. He is a graduate of Government and Public Policy at UCC and holds a Diploma in Law from the IPA.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
And they had to have a big consultation to figure that out. ..Give me a break whatever happened to good old common sense.
Regrettably in this day and age, common sense isn’t very common.
yes censorship works
It also favours government propaganda and oppression.
exactly, suicide is unpopular so journalists should not report, this is the censorship line
I think the figures should be reported daily.
The truth is well masked and denies the serious straits many people are in and take desperate measures. It then is easier for them to say that improvements and help are not needed.
It may well be sensible not to report the method but where and how many would be most telling. I’m think most of us know the reasons.
THIS SHOULD BE REPORTED.
It should,not be hidden and it is to be recognised that the problems are much bigger and more widespread than the government report with their big smiles and all the carry on at the EEC.
Media agencies should provide journalists with the ethics of reporting on suicides.
There are already ethics about reporting suicide. There’s a great group called Headline that monitor media for such things who came in to give us a talk when I studied media.
These ethics aren’t exactly legally implemented, though. Most of the changes in the reporting of suicide are pretty subtle and you’d nearly need them to be pointed out to notice them.
For instance, you shouldn’t ever read an article these days claiming somebody had “committed suicide”, since it was decriminalised, there’s no crime to be committed.
Areas where suicide is a problem shouldn’t be refereed to as “hot spots” and the methods used shouldn’t be reported.
When two people kill themselves together, they ofter get referred to as “Romeo and Juliet”, which romaticises suicide.
As I said, though, these aren’t legal issues. Just common sense, really.
I don’t think that the reporting on suicide is the issue.A poorly resources mental health service is having a far bigger impact on the numbers than anything else.Now how about a big media discussion on this point.
Sadly, there is nothing in a media report that is not easily found by a Google search.
Just completed the ASIST refresher training (Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training). I did the initial training 4 years ago.
For those that are interested you can find out when it may be in your area ~
There’d be little risk of any copycats if reporters used terms that made the legacy of suicide seem unappealing. e.g. instead of saying “a person has taken their own life” they should say “another idiot has taken the cowards way out”. Copycats are weak-minded & unoriginal so attaching a negative stigma is a much better deterrent that the “poor you” mentality.
And before people start thinking I’m trying to insult suicidal people, maybe read it again a few times. I’m specifically talking about copycats (as the article is about) NOT people with real mental health issues!
Anyone that thinks suicide is “the cowards way out” doesn’t understand. Not sure what you mean by “real mental health issues”. It is something that can happen to anyone, given certain circumstances. Drugs or alcohol can also influence a person’s state of mind. Including prescribed drugs eg anti-depressants. While some people can tolerate these drugs, for others they can increase the risk of suicide, especially in the younger age groups. Hence the FDA have a black box warning on these psychoactive drugs ~
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/InformationbyDrugClass/UCM096273
Going on or coming off these drugs can also be a vulnerable time.
{ Do not stop or change without discussing with a good doctor, due to the dangers of withdrawal incorrectly }
Well why not to ban movies and their making too then?? Example: Wild tales…a pilot that takes his own life and others too. Movies, news, books are fonts of great ideas and surely do not apply only for suiciding’s thoughts, but to wanna be rapists, racists, killers, thieves…maybe should just banned people from all forms of information and entertainment
have your say