Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
MILITANT ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP Sea Shepherd today said it is seeking a Supreme Court injunction to halt a controversial shark culling policy in Western Australia.
The group, best known for battling Japanese whalers in the Antarctic, has teamed up with Sharon Burden, the mother of a shark attack victim, to apply for a judicial review of the decision, claiming it involves the unlawful killing of a protected species.
“Sea Shepherd Australia believes that the tender process was unlawful, that the WA state government has been acting unlawfully, that the taking and killing of protected animals was illegal,” it said in a statement.
“The law contemplates some sort of process being in place to protect these protected animals and that process has been scotched.”
The controversial policy to catch and kill sharks off popular west coast beaches was given the green light in January after six fatal attacks in the past two years.
It is aimed at reducing the risks to water users and allows baited drum lines with hooks designed to capture large sharks to be set one kilometre offshore at busy Western Australian beaches for a trial period until 30 April.
Any shark longer than three metres snagged by the lines and deemed to be a threat – including great white, bull and tiger sharks – is being destroyed.
Sixty-six sharks were caught in the first three weeks, according to the West Australian newspaper, which today said there were fears among fisheries officers that sharks impaled on hooks were attracting bigger sharks to coastal areas.
The cull move has angered conservationists with rallies held at sites around the country over the past few weeks. Opponents claim the trial flies in the face of international obligations to protect the great white shark.
“We are seeking an injunction to remove the drum lines immediately on the basis that a judicial review needs to be conducted as to the way the shark mitigation programme was rolled out,” Sea Shepherd said.
Sharks are common in Australian waters and experts say attacks are increasing in line with population growth and the popularity of water sports.
- © AFP 2014.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Expect plenty more revelations.
ABP is a common name popping up a lot
Looking forward to the rest of the DNeigh results as they come in…
Just hearing some horses that died in Aintree were sold as beef shocking
I’m doing a sub-four -minute mile. Shergar DNA
Monaghan just up the road from me. Usually were Very good NEIGHbours until now.
I hope all these products with horse meat in them aren’t just being thrown away. There is nothing wrong with horse meat the only problem with the whole thing is that they didn’t tell us that the products contain horse meat. There are plenty of starving people that would gladly take horse meat burgers.
Stupid question…doesn’t horse cost more than cows?
Apparently not
I doubt it’s the 100% healthy ones that are ending up in the slaughterhouse.
We’re not eating racing stallions.
the price per kilo of beef paid to the farmer is 4.00- 4.50 per kilo carcass weight …….. I was talking to a farmer the other day and he told me that they just get paid for the carcass…they do not get paid for the organs or the hide (leather) ….
the price of horsemeat is .90 per kilo………..
The farmer was telling me that in Ireland that because of the new regulations being brought in with regard to horse ownership that certain people who own a lot of horses have been selling them to knackers (the correct term i.e. buyers of worn-out or unwanted horses ).
He maintained that you can buy anything from five to ten horses for the price of a cow and that in some cases people who can no longer afford to keep horses are giving them away !
have your say