Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Joel Tegerdine/Press Association Images

Phil Hogan 'should hold plebiscite anyway' --- Lord Mayor

Oisín Quinn says the fact that 98 councillors supported the move, while only 19 voted against is as close as you get to unanimity “outside of Iraq and North Korea”.

JUST BECAUSE ONE of the four Dublin authorities voted against holding a county-wide vote on a directly-elected mayor, there’s no reason a plebiscite couldn’t be held anyway.

That’s the contention of Oisín Quinn, the Labour councillor and current lord mayor of Dublin, who has been one of the main proponents of proposals to bring in a mayor with executive powers.

The Local Government Reform Act 2014 set out that a majority of members in each of the four councils needed to cast their vote in favour of a plan to hold a county-wide plebiscite for it to go ahead.

Fingal County Council scuppered that plan with its vote last Monday, with a clear majority against. The votes in the other three councils — Dublin City, Dublin South and Dun Laoghaire Rathdown were overwhelmingly in favour.

If there had been a four-council ‘lock’, the Government would have been required to hold the plebiscite.

However, the result of that wider vote wouldn’t mean the automatic introduction of a directly-elected mayor at the next local elections. It would merely have required the Environment Minister to write a report on the issue within two years.

Here’s the relevant section of the Act:

act

[Here's the full act. Relevant section is on page 145]

“I don’t think we lost very much by not having that report,” Quinn said.

There’s nothing to stop the Government from holding a plebiscite as a form of public consultation.

Phil Hogan’s statement, released in the wake of the Fingal vote, said:

I gave the opportunity to the elected members to develop a proposal for a plebiscite.They have not achieved a consensus, and further assessment of options must await the new councils to be elected in May.

However Quinn contends that as 98 councillors across the four authorities voted for the plebiscite to go ahead, it shows there’s a clear public appetite to have ballot in the issue.

“Of the 117 councillors who voted, the final tally was 98 for to 19 against.

Outside of Iraq and North Korea that’s about as close as you’d get to unanimity.”

Quinn concedes that if the poll were to be held, there would still be nothing compelling central Government to pursue proposals for a directly-elected mayor of the capital.

But he contends a majority vote would “send a strong message” on whether its something people want, and he says public debate in advance of the vote would help focus attention on the issue and “broaden the scope of who is involved”.

Fingal Council voted down the motion by a margin of 16 for and 6 against on Monday, with many members citing a “lack of detail” in current proposals for a reformed mayoral office.

Others argued that the seven-week lead-in for a 23 May vote wasn’t enough time to hold a proper debate on the issue, while some contended that outlying areas of the county would be left behind if the ‘executive mayor’ plan went ahead.

However, the councillors voted overwhelmingly in favour of a motion to allow people to vote in a stand-alone plebiscite at a later date — after “sufficient time and debate” had taken place on “clear proposals” for a directly-elected mayor.

Revealed: Here are the powers a directly-elected Dublin mayor could have >

Column: Voting down a plebiscite for a directly-elected Dublin mayor would be bad for democracy

Read: Dublin City councillors in favour of having vote for directly-elected mayor

Also: Two more councils back mayor proposal, but Fingal’s ‘nay’ scuppers plan

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
21 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Straighttalker
    Favourite Straighttalker
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 9:12 AM

    Hogan another nasty bullying individual of this sham of a government

    76
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Declan Pollard
    Favourite Declan Pollard
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 9:04 AM

    The people of Dublin are denied a chance to vote in a referendum to have a Lord Mayor for Dublin, curtesy of councillors, who voted it down because the mayor would have executive powers. Imagine that! So much for Enda’s democratic revolution! Talking about denying a basic, democratic fundamental right! The people should be given the right to vote for a mayor, whether they want one or not. Makes me mad!

    63
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ciarraioch
    Favourite Ciarraioch
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 8:36 AM

    Wouldn’t a more logical solution be to allow Fingal Council, to remove itself entirely from the structure of Councils in Dublin as a whole and Elect its own CEO/Mayor ?
    This will enable them to protect the future development of that region.
    The remaining parts of the City , can then Elect its own CEO/Mayor ?

    55
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian Keelty
    Favourite Brian Keelty
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 10:49 AM

    There’s no place for logic in this debate or politics in general. … so stop

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Glen
    Favourite Glen
    Report
    Apr 6th 2014, 12:16 AM

    Oh god, that would mean the government would actually have to use part 8 of the local government act 2001! issues like this is what it was made for after all, but they’re just so fond of that outdated 1991 local government act.. What to do what to do when you’re no clue what your doing!

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Don Juan
    Favourite Don Juan
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 9:07 AM

    Do we really want more politicians?!

    Ireland’s Mayor Quimby types shouldn’t get the chance.

    40
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Fehily
    Favourite Michael Fehily
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 9:58 AM

    This isn’t about Ireland. This is about Dublin only. And yes Dublin does need a Mayor to run the city without having to apply to an FG Dublin hater before even building a bus stop.

    41
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Campbell
    Favourite John Campbell
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 9:22 AM

    Just another layer of bureaucracy. This mayor would have to have an administrative staff and of course the usual perqs. The first item on her/his agenda would be how to raise funds i.e. more tax. Meanwhile the government department dealing with local issues will continue as if nothing was changed. Best example of this is the HSE and the Department of Health.

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alan Lawlor
    Favourite Alan Lawlor
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 10:40 AM

    Let’s hope the people of Fingal vote out these 16 councillors for denying all of Dublin a democratic voice on this proposal.

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tara Murphy
    Favourite Tara Murphy
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 1:34 PM

    As a resident of Fingal I emailed the counsellors to vent my anger at their decision,2 got back to me of which 1 was very rude & not impressed.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gus Sheridan
    Favourite Gus Sheridan
    Report
    May 31st 2014, 8:56 AM

    Name and shame Tara…

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Fehily
    Favourite Michael Fehily
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 9:44 AM

    Hogan and his anti Dublin FG “Fellow Travellers” instructed their FG Councillors to vote against it . Just like Jung 11 in N Korea. They will not allow Dublin develop because it doesn’t suit their agenda. Their support is in rural Ireland and consequently they have no interest in a Dublin . Never did. The latest poll result shows their rural support dropping which means that they will now become even more anti Dublin than ever to try and get their rural votes back .

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fergus O'Neill
    Favourite Fergus O'Neill
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 9:33 AM

    Hmmm, so the lord mayor reckons that the office of lord mayor should have more power, and is happy to ignore legislation to achieve that…..

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin Bell
    Favourite Kevin Bell
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 9:41 AM

    No. The office of Lord Mayor is completely separate from the proposed, new office of directly elected Mayor of Dublin.

    28
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Roche
    Favourite Paul Roche
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 10:07 AM

    A smart person might realise that we have elected councillors who can sort this out. Before asking the people if they should have a single executive mayor for either the city or what once was the county of Dublin, the councillors should prepare for the way in which they would cooperate with such a scheme.
    Abolishing the separate councils for a start?

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gerry Grimes
    Favourite Gerry Grimes
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 10:52 AM

    I don’t doubt that the councillors were looking after their own skin – as they’re genetically programmed to do – but they did us a favour – why in the name of all that’s holy would we want another layer of political ineptitude on top of the morass we already have here?
    What’s more why vote in the council elections to put in more amateurs to run our counties – these people are trained to do nothing other than get themselves elected and swap their votes with other boroughs to get favours done.
    Don’t encourage them – don’t vote

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alan Lawlor
    Favourite Alan Lawlor
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 11:37 AM

    What makes that bunch of amateurs in Fingal co co more qualified than the people of Dublin to decide on whether we should have a directly elected Mayor?
    They have denied us that opportunity.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute steve white
    Favourite steve white
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 5:41 PM

    did you read the proposal?

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute E F Fanning
    Favourite E F Fanning
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 2:13 PM

    You can’t beat the labour sellouts. Say one thing, do another. That Quinn & Costello now get coverage for their ramblings is laughable after many of their councillors voted down the referendum. Looking forward to seeing this shower wiped out in May. Blueshirts Light. Shameful behaviour since #ge11

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute steve white
    Favourite steve white
    Report
    Apr 5th 2014, 5:41 PM

    have all the people giving out about this vote actually read the proposal they were voting on

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Peter Emerson
    Favourite Peter Emerson
    Report
    Apr 6th 2014, 11:19 AM

    For Phil Hogan to talk about consensus AND majority voting is (oxy)moronic.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      News in 60 seconds