Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
FACEBOOK HAS OFFICIALLY launched its Snapchat style app Slingshot in the US, more than a week after it was released prematurely on the App Store.
The app, which is available on iOS and Android, will allow users to take photos and send them to their friends, and edit them by drawing or adding text. Once it’s received and viewed, the image or video will disappear within a set timeframe.
The catch is you can’t view a photo or video until you send one back to the person who sent it, unlike other apps which allow you to view without responding.
While there are many similarities between it and Snapchat, the team behind the app are keen to stress that Slingshot offers a different experience.
Photos and videos that don’t stick around forever allow for sharing that’s more expressive, raw and spontaneous. We can connect the same way we like to live: in the moment. We’ve enjoyed using Snapchat to send each other ephemeral messages and expect there to be a variety of apps that explore this new way of sharing.With Slingshot, we saw an opportunity to create something new and different: a space where you can share everyday moments with lots of people at once.
Much like Paper, which is a reimagined version of the Facebook newsfeed, Slingshot will only be available in the US for now. Both it and Paper were designed by Facebook’s Creative Labs, a section of the company that’s dedicated to creating new apps for the company.
The company previously tried to muscle in on Snapchat’s territory by releasing Poke in December 2012. Although it was the most downloaded app at the time of its release, it failed to catch on with users and was eventually removed from the App Store in May 2014.
Facebook also tried to purchase Snapchat for $3 billion in November 2013, but was rejected.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Pay the police a pittance and they won’t try an inch.
Interesting finding given the inquiry heard no evidence from the Police. It sounds like a typical British inquiry we’ve experienced many times in Ireland. It starts with an outcome and works it’s way backwards from there to find evidence that fits that outcome.
Do you mean the units that deliberately slowed down to delay their arrival at the scene thereby giving adequate time to the murderer to carry out Allahs will
Those are hate facts.
@George Roche: Yes, apparently. And any commentary on them or on how they might possibly be related to the Tunisian attacks would really be hate opinion.
Have you read the disclaimer about bias in their results, I’d say not given your blind faith as displayed in your post citing them
And as for your claim the journal banned someone you know (most likely another of your on line identities I’m guessing) for a comment: I’d say you’ve gone the “full Trump” there, by banned you actually mean the moderator deleted a comment ? Big difference!
@Boganity: You’d be wrong on all counts.
Why is a low paid Tunisian police officer going to risk himself to protect wealthy tourists ?
Because it’s his job
@Mrs M: Poorly paid police around the world protect richer people than themselves every day amd always have done. Not everything is all about money.
It is if your a policeman in country that doesn’t provide an income to your family if you get killed on the job.
Hello.
have your say