We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
A CANADIAN COURT has ordered Google to remove links relating to a specific company from all of its sites around the world.
The case involved an industrial manufacturer called Equustek Solutions, which claimed that a rival company, Datalink, ripped off its network device technology before selling it through more than 300 websites. As part of its lawsuit, the company wants Google to remove all search results that link to these sites, according to GigaOM.
While Google voluntarily removed the links from Google.ca, the main site Canadians would search on, the Supreme Court of British Columbia has granted a temporary injunction which forces Google to remove search results from all of its sites around the world.
While Google argued that Canadian law cannot be imposed around the world, the court referred to the country’s Law and Equity Act, which allows a court to grant broader powers when it feels it’s necessary.
The latter objection may sound like an issue more properly addressed at the territorial competence stage of the analysis. However, the question of whether the Court has territorial competence to hear the application because of its connection to the persons or facts involved is distinct from the question of whether, in the words of s. 39 of the Law and Equity Act, it is “just or convenient” that the order sought should be made to enjoin or mandate the particular conduct.
The company is also preparing to comply with ‘the right to be forgotten’ ruling that was made in the European Court of Justice back in May. The company recently uploaded a form which allows European citizens to request links to be removed from European search results.
Google has until 27 June to comply with the Canadian court’s ruling.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
“Right be forgotten” sounds like a euphemism for “right not be seen”.
Imagine if Google asked to be forgotten. We wouldn’t be able to Google Google to Google things.
Has the government asked them to remove “Anglo” “Bertie” “Cowen”
So this case hasn’t anything to do with the EU ruling from Spain, which only applies in the EU (and only to individuals and not to companies or politicians or state bodies), but is instead a decision from the Canadian supreme court.
Kindof a misleading headline, isn’t it? It makes it sound like the Canadian supreme court cited the EU verdict as precedent, when in fact it only mentioned it when considering if google Ads and google Search were linked.
You might as well have said this followed the Max Mosely decision, since that got a mention in the Canadian judgement too…
When you think about it, it’s an incredible own goal…
Considering this article alludes to the companies & issues in question, and the journal is searchable on google, presumably this info is living on borrowed time. You should have finished the piece with “this article will self destruct in 5 seconds” to really drive home the drama of this decision!
Sounds like Streisand effect is brewing…
have your say