We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
ONE OF THE co-authors behind Facebook’s experiment to alter the content of some users’ news feeds to study emotional contagion has apologised for the anxiety caused by the experiment
Facebook data scientist Adam Kramer, posted an explanation behind the research and said that “having written and designed this experiment myself, I can tell you that our goal was never to upset anyone.”
Kramer said that the goal of the study was to see how much of an emotional impact people posting positive content has on others, mainly whether they experience negative feeling or believe they’re left out.
The reason we did this research is because we care about the emotional impact of Facebook and the people that use our product. We felt that it was important to investigate the common worry that seeing friends post positive content leads to people feeling negative or left out. At the same time, we were concerned that exposure to friends’ negativity might lead people to avoid visiting Facebook. We didn’t clearly state our motivations in the paper.
The study, which was carried out over one week in 2012 and affected 0.04%, or 700,000 of users, found that, contrary to expectation, when users see a certain kind of emotion, it encourages it rather than suppresses it.
The study was conducted by researchers affiliated with Facebook, Cornell University and the University of California at San Francisco and appeared in the 17 June edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Researchers have condemned the study saying that it breached ethical guidelines since it didn’t allow users to decide if they wanted to take part in the study.
Kramer said that he could understand why some people would have concerns about the paper and that both himself and his co-authors were “very sorry for the way the paper described the research and any anxiety it caused.
“In hindsight, the research benefits of the paper may not have justified all of this anxiety,” he said.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Congratulations to all involved, it is a wonderful opportunity.
Hmm, that’s what they said about unpaid internships.
@Phillip O’Brien: ya right great on you supporting a cult
@rowan hill: I have the right to my religion, yes.
You might need to check exactly what a “cult” is before using it in ad hominem attacks.
@Phillip O’Brien: Opportunity for what? To kowtow to a corrupt organisation and it’s mealy mouthed leader?
The irony of women doing laundry/ironing for this is beyond comprehension.
@Phillip O’Brien: you need to look up what ad hominem actually means.
@Dave O Keeffe: Apparently giving out about massively wealthy international organisations now qualifies as an “ad hominem” – what a world we live in.
@Dave O Keeffe: No I don’t, there was a statement made against me.
@Phillip O’Brien: cult (noun) – 1. a system of religious veneration and devotion directed toward a particular figure or object. Eh, yeah….
@Phillip O’Brien: no, the comment referred to you as a supporter of the church but referred to the church as a cult.
@Phillip O’Brien:
Yes you do have a right to your religion Phillip. It’s just a pity your chosen religion (The Catholic Church) is the most unchristian organisation on the planet.
@roderick: Need I say more – your comment is proof of what I’m saying.
@Dave O Keeffe: I’d suggest you read the thread again.
@James Joseph Superior Power: That’s certainly not been my experience.
@Phillip O’Brien: But it is the experience of so many who went through rape and abuse or imprisonment in a laundry where their babies were sold or those who didn’t make it in Tuam. You are entitled to your religion but let’s not sugar coat those other experiences
@Phillip O’Brien: Hi Phillip. I took the liberty of getting you a definition.
cult
kʌlt/
noun
a system of religious veneration and devotion directed towards a particular figure or object.
@David Quigley: Thank you. Your definition proves exactly that Roman Catholicism is not a cult.
Many people here are implying that RC is a cult which worships/adores/venerates Pope Francis which is clearly false and an uneducated view.
Unpaid laundry work has a familiar ring to it
Mascot is a sheep….. says it all !
@Hello DAVE!: the flock with the frock.
@Hello DAVE!: it’s all about blindly following….no questions asked, a sheep is the perfect moscot.
That’s why they refer to followers as the flock.
How do the 500,000 reconcile themselves with this? And wait till the Vatican shames and sorrows for the rest off the US, Ireland, the UK, Austrailia and then all the third world countries where these dark sick secrets are still hidden.
Can any of the faithful answer and remember, it’s not a once off….have a look at the 500000 of you in the Phoenix park. The crowd is huge. Please note it’s a safe bet that at least that number of children have suffered from the RCC the last 1000 years.
Please let me know.
@Paul Furey: at least that, worldwide in the last 200 years its likely in the millions that have been abused,
@Barry Somers: the earliest record of a paedophile priest dates from 400AD in the churches own writings. 1600 years of this.
This is like a referendum with thejournal carefully balancing the articles.
@Daveinson: Baa!
@Daveinson: would you rather they wrote articles defending child abuse? Millions abused worldwide, all covered up by the Vatican, what could you possibly put on the other side to balance that out?
@Dave O Keeffe: An opinion piece from an Archbishop saying “yeah but it wasn’t ALL the priests!!!” should do nicely for balance on this terribly nuanced issue…
@ihcalaM: it wouldn’t get past the Vatican because it would have to admit culpability.
@Dave O Keeffe: True. I forgot they were still in the ‘we’re really sorry about all that stuff and by the way we’re still shielding serial abusers’ phase.
@Dave O Keeffe: Is the Pope a Catholic??
@Peter Casey:
He might be Catholic but he is no Christian
Baptised a Catholic, but will not be part of a criminal organization. A religion that has always been a business. Granted the same could be said for all organised religions…. but the fallacy of the Catholic Church is beyond belief.
@Donal Desmond: Are You sure about that Sir? The Mother Church stopped Baptising human beings since well 1944 in english and 1777 in Latin. III. The Spirit of the Age http://ourladyisgod.com/
@Peadar117: I hope you stick around after the visit. You are great craic. Seriously, the sky fairy conspiracies are great.
Sheep outfit. Says it all, really. Waterford Whispers territory.
@Martin Meyler: I’m presuming you’re being sarcastic? You do actually get it?
@Phillip O’Brien: well, duh…
The church’s capacity for irony has never been great.
And if you check the link, the clear aim is to lure in the kiddies. Which, you’d imagine at this stage, they might have copped on as to how that might be perceived.
They should all don sheep outfits.
How are we still so stupid as to still believe in this nonsense?
@Tony Doran: Slowly, but surely, we are overcoming it.
Ironing mammies?? Have we moved on at all? I’ve a feeling we’re not in 1979 anymore
Good to see the Church back in the laundry business.
Some of those Priestly vestments will need a good scrubbing..
Sheep thing is creepy…
Baa baa black sheep have you any wool, yes sir, yes sir, three bags full, one for the master, one for the slave and one for the little boy who lives down the lane…..Hmmmmmm.
The use of the Defence Forces to fill the gaps where insufficient volunteers were available is disgraceful.
The Defense Forces are not volunteers and have been ordered to fill the gaps where the church couldn’t provide. It’s a disgrace.
have your say