Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
STAFF IN SOCIAL welfare offices in Dublin have been told to refuse any Greyhound worker who applies for jobseeker’s payments and is currently involved in the ongoing industrial dispute with the waste management company.
Workers represented by Siptu claim they are being locked out of their work at the company’s plant in Clondalkin over a dispute about wage cuts.
Greyhound claims staff have refused to work after they rejected a Labour Court recommendation that pay should be reduced.
TheJournal.ie has learned that earlier this month the Department of Social Protection informed staff working in local welfare offices to refuse applications for jobseeker’s payments by Greyhound workers involved in the dispute.
In a circular issued on 10 July by the Regional Support Unit staff were informed of a case where an employee involved in the dispute with Greyhound applied for jobseeker’s benefit in the Blanchardstown social welfare office.
The case was used as test case with a deciding officer determining on 9 July that the employee was out of employment for “reason of a stoppage of work which was due to a trade dispute”.
As a result this person was disqualified from receiving jobseeker’s payments until the still-unresolved dispute comes to an end. The circular says that the same should apply to any other workers in dispute with Greyhound who apply for jobseeker’s payments.
Siptu’s Owen Reidy, who represents Greyhound workers, said that the circular was “crazy” and said the union would be encouraging workers to challenge the decision.
“We would have advised people to sign on, we were giving out that advice,” he said, adding that the union had told Social Protection officials that the dispute was a lockout and not a strike.
The circular also tells staff who receive an application from a Greyhound worker to contact the waste management company to confirm whether the employee is involved in the trade dispute.
“If you have an application for a jobseeker’s payment from other employees at Greyhound, it is necessary to contact the employer to confirm whether the employee was involved in the trade dispute,” the circular states.
However the Department of Social Protection denied that the circular stated this.
In its response to queries, the Department also noted that the circular also told officials to inform dole applicants of their rights to appeal the decision.
It added: “The test case decision referred to in the Circular was made by an independent appointed statutory Deciding Officer. Should a revised decision be made at any time in the future, a further Circular will issue to officials advising them of same.”
However, Sinn Féin has called on the Tánaiste Joan Burton, who is the Social Protection Minister, to withdraw the circular.
Its party spokesperson on social protection Aengus Ó Snodaigh: “These workers were locked out by their bosses in Greyhound and now a Department under the control of the Tánaiste and Leader of the Labour Party is directing that they be left destitute.”
The workers have been locked out at the waste disposal company since 17 June after management attempted to force workers to accept wage cuts of up to 35 per cent and have employed relief staff to carry out waste collections during the dispute.
Greyhound claim that the staff were not ‘locked out’ but refused to work after they rejected a Labour Court recommendation that pay should be reduced to bring it in line with industry standards.
Greyhound has since employed agency staff and claims there has been an increase in waste collection productivity.
The company did not respond to calls this week.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Best not to say how old you are. The government will probably find a way to demand more tax
@Marc Power: Agreed, They want us plebs to work until 70 while they swan off at 50 with numerous pensions and directorships.
@Marc Power: In fairness Marc they do need to know how many extra trolleys to order for our hospitals…………..
@David Huston:
Once again, since about 2011 a government minister cannot receive more than one pension related to the highest position they attained and not until they get to normal retirement age.
Directorships are a matter for a company and not paid for the taxpayer.
Maybe you didn’t know but it seems a lot of commenters throw out statements like yours, a flat out lie, in the hope it cons a few “plebs”
@P.J. Nolan: Enda Kenny’s pension pot would have cost a private sector worker €5.2 million. Excessive by any standards.
@Sean:
Agreed, his pension is related to his salary and that salary was too high.
might reach the 100-and get the cheque from the government.
@TheBluffmaster2: it would probably bounce frame it instead
@Jonathan Power: I’d frame it, Might be worth something in a thousand years all going well……
@Jonathan Power: well I don’t think Michael D will be giving it to me anyway.
While Nanny State says No Smoking! No Drinking! No Gambling! No Drugs! Just DIE as we can’t afford you to live beyond you’re TAXABLE Years.
@B.J.Elmes: No Gambling? No Drinking? What State do you live in?
healthy life years??? tbh there’s nothing healthy about society these days,,, you’ll have 120 year olds addicted to social media etc when the average human age reaches that, IF it does!!!
have your say