Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

stock image via Shutterstock

UN: Ireland must take action to decriminalise abortion

The Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill comes in for particular criticism from the UN Human Rights Committee.

IRELAND’S LAWS IN the area of abortion have come in for severe criticism in the latest observations from the UN Human Rights Committee.

The international body has today released a hard-hitting, eight-page document of “concluding observations” which also criticise Ireland’s handling of the symphysiotomy controversy and lack of progress investigating the institutional abuse of women and children in mother-and-baby homes.

It follows Justice Minister Frances Fitzgerald’s appearance in Geneva to defend Ireland’s human rights record earlier this month.

Abortion

The Committee reiterates its earlier criticisms of the “highly restrictive” circumstances in which a woman can lawfully have an abortion in Ireland.

Last year’s Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill, introduced in the wake of the controversy surrounding the death of Savita Halappanavar, also comes in for particular focus.

The panel says it has particular concern over:

  • (i) The criminalisation of abortion under section 22 of the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act, including in cases of rape, incest, fatal foetal abnormality and serious risks to the health of the mother, which may lead to up to 14 years of imprisonment, except in cases that constitutes a “real and substantive risk” to the life of a pregnant women.
  • (ii) The lack of legal and procedural clarity concerning what constitutes “real and substantive risk” to the life, as opposed to the health, of the pregnant women.
  • (iii) The requirement of an excessive degree of scrutiny by medical professionals for pregnant and suicidal women leading to further mental distress
  • (iv) The discriminatory impact of the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act on women who are unable to travel abroad to seek abortions.
  • (v) The strict restrictions on the channels via which information on crisis pregnancy options may be provided to women and the imposition of criminal sanctions on healthcare providers who refer women to abortion services outside the State party under the Regulation of Information (Services outside the state for the Termination of Pregnancies) Act of 1995.
  • (vi) The severe mental suffering caused by the denial of abortion services to women seeking abortions due to rape, incest, fatal foetal abnormality or serious risks to health.

And it says the State should:

  • (a) Revise its legislation on abortion, including its Constitution, to provide for additional exceptions in cases of rape, incest, serious risks to the health of the mother, or fatal foetal abnormality.
  • (b) Swiftly adopt the Guidance Document to clarify what constitutes a “real and substantive risk” to the life of the pregnant woman; and
  • (c) Consider making more information on crisis pregnancy options available through a variety of channels, and ensure that healthcare providers who provide information on safe abortion services abroad are not subject to criminal sanctions.

The recommendations were welcomed by support group TFMR which said:

The time for change in this area is well beyond overdue. TFMR Ireland continue to be contacted weekly by distraught women who find themselves in this horrendous and heart-breaking situation.
There is absolutely no excuse to continue to compound the suffering of a woman facing the loss of a much wanted baby.
The government is acutely aware of the issue, and of its impact on women and their families, and it is their job as legislators to resolve this barrier to services which women urgently require.

Symphysiotomy

Ireland should open a “prompt, independent and thorough investigation” into cases of symphysiotomy, the panel recommended.

The Committee said it was concerned at the State’s failure to initiate a comprehensive probe into the matter.

And it said Ireland should also identify, prosecute and punish – where still possible – the perpetrators for performing a symphysiotomy without a patient’s consent.

Institutional Abuse

Flowers for Magdalenes remembrance PA Wire / Press Association Images PA Wire / Press Association Images / Press Association Images

The panel also expresses concern over “the lack of prompt, independent, thorough and effective investigations into all allegations of abuse, mistreatment or neglect of women and children in the Magdalene Laundries, children’s institutions, and mother-and-baby homes”.

It particularly highlights the failure to identify all of the the perpetrators of abuse, the low number of prosecutions and “the failure to provide full and effective remedies to victims”.

It recommends:

The State party should conduct prompt, independent and thorough investigation into all allegations of abuse in Magdalene Laundries, children’s institutions and mother and baby homes, prosecute and punish the perpetrators with penalties commensurate with the gravity of the offence, and ensure that all victims obtain an effective remedy, including appropriate compensation, restitution, rehabilitation and measures of satisfaction.

Violence against women

Domestic and sexual abuse of women remains a “serious problem” in Ireland, according to the Committee.

It says there are are a number of “administrative and financial obstacles” for marginalised women in particular to access support services, particularly “women whose immigration status is dependent on her spouse or partner”.

The recommendations:

The State party should take further legislative as well as policy measures to ensure that all women, particularly women from vulnerable and marginalized groups, have equal access to protection against perpetrators of violence.It should also establish a systematic data collection system to inform current and future policies and priorities, and provide, in its next periodic report, disaggregated statistics on complaints, prosecutions and sentences regarding violence against women.

The Committee also criticises the slow pace in modifying the use of language in the Constitution, regarding “the role of women in the home“.

And it says that despite the adoption of the Electoral (Amendment) Political Funding Act 2012, which encourages political parties to establish a quota for female candidates, “women continue to be underrepresented in both public and private sectors, particularly in decision-making positions”.

Policing and prisons

GSOC — the Garda watchdog body — also comes in for criticism in today’s list of observations.

The Committee expresses concern at the ability of the body ”to function independently and effectively, including the requirement of an approval from the Minister of Justice to examine police practices, policies and procedures, and the length of time taken to complete investigations due to lack of cooperation” by gardaí.

And it recommends

  • The State party should proceed with the timely adoption of the General Scheme of the Garda Síochána (Amendment) Bill 2014 to strengthen the independence and effectiveness of the Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission.
  • It should also ensure that the proposed establishment of the Garda Síochána Authority does not encroach upon or undermine the work of GSOC, but rather complement and support it.

Regarding the Prison Service, the panel says that while it welcomes measures taken to improve conditions of detention, it remains concerned over lack of in-cell sanitation and the lack of segregation between convicted criminals and people who are remanded in custody in advance of a trial.

According to the Committee:

The State party should step up its efforts to improve the living conditions and treatment of detainees and address overcrowding and the practice of “slopping out” as a matter of urgency in line with the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (U.N. Doc. E/5988 (1977)). It should establish a concrete timeline for the achievement of complete separation of remand and sentenced prisoners, juvenile and adult prisoners and detained immigrants and sentenced prisoners. It should also implement the new complaints model for all categories of complaints without further delay and ensure its independent functioning.

Additionally, the Committee expresses concern at “the number of persons being imprisoned for failure to pay fines”.

Travellers and the Roma community

Last year’s removal of two Roma children from their families in Dublin and Athlone comes in for particular criticism from the UN committee.

While it also points to “the lack of progress in implementing its previous recommendations to recognize Travellers as an ethnic minority”.

Its recommendations in the area:

  • The State party should take concrete steps to recognise Travellers as an ethnic minority group, and amend the Housing Act of 2002 to meet the specific accommodation requirements of Traveller families.
  • In light of the abolishment of the National Action Plan Against Racism, the State party should adopt an effective policy and action plan, developed in consultation with Traveller and Roma communities, to redress situations of inequality.

You can find the full list of observations made by the committee here.

Ireland at the UN: We have ‘no solution’ for women who can’t afford to travel for an abortion

UN told symphysiotomy patients were ‘operated upon wide awake and often screaming’

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
128 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ger Fleming
    Favourite Ger Fleming
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 12:48 PM

    It’s about time we got our act together. Freedom of choice is what is needed. This nanny state needs to go and also to get rid of the symbiotic relationship between church and state.

    458
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ryan Carroll
    Favourite Ryan Carroll
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:13 PM

    Whats aggravating is Irelands only a nanny state when it’s not in your interests…where is this nanny state when they charge you for the crime of walking into the emergency room? Where is it when they tell you at 40k a year each your parents income means you are ”too well off” to deserve a free up front college education?
    They claim to care about the kids right? Yet they make secondary and third level ever more expensive for them, and their parents, who are breaking their backs paying 53% tax, not getting home until 7pm, not able to take a deep breath until after 10pm, are crippled paying for childcare?
    Why is Lucinda et all not proposing bills for some new funding system so we can restore universal college education? Why are they not proposing Germany-France style child care? Why are they taking medical cards off special needs kids one minute then telling us they believe in universal healthcare the next??

    Where is their concern for the kids when they are spreading homophobia by insinuating same sex parents would make a child grow up weird, thus contributing to those kids being bullied?

    Pro-Life and worried about the children ar*e…they are no such thing…they are merely petrified of what they perceive to be conservative constituents..which is all the more maddening because the bible MANDATES abortion!

    181
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alan O'connor
    Favourite Alan O'connor
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:22 PM

    So basically why isn’t the state paying for your kids.

    Sweet Jesus.

    84
    See 4 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kerry Blake
    Favourite Kerry Blake
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:37 PM

    You do understand that if you pay taxes that education is one of the areas that should be covered by that Alan?

    131
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ryan Carroll
    Favourite Ryan Carroll
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:44 PM

    I don’t have any kids Alan, and I never intend to have them, but I see in my (when I’m normally working) three jobs how hard parents in this country have to slog for their kids, even people you might describe as upper middle class are in a bit of a struggle these days, paying massive taxes for nothing in return, and then I see people who contribute nothing get their entire lives funded by the state, and that makes me angry.

    As to the attitude of ‘why should I pay for you/your kids’ the answer is quite simple: because I pay for you too.
    We live in a society, and certain things are better funded collectively as a group than on an individual basis, can you imagine if we had a full fee for every aspect of healthcare? police?
    The people paying that 53% tax, who want their kids education covered are ALREADY paying for the ambulance and medics that will come save your life if you have an MI in the middle of the street, they already pay for the police and the exotic vehicles, helicopters and firearms that protect you from terrorists and gangland criminals, they paid for most of the cost for you to go to primary school and secondary school, they paid for your vaccinations so you would not get sick…

    Nobody is saying the state needs to do everything for us, I’m even ok with water bills, nor do I think the state needs to own airlines and phone companies…but healthcare and education are the most basic, fundamental public services and they are the most expensive for an individual or family to bear.

    125
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John R
    Favourite John R
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 3:03 PM

    Ryan, whatever about first and second level education, third level education is charged for in many modern States. It is inherently expensive. Much more expensive than primary or secondary education. All the evidence shows that people with a third level qualification earn more over their lifetime than those without such an education so it confers a distinct lifetime benefit on recipients. This is why many States charge for third level education. In many EU States where it is free far fewer people attend 3rd level proportionately than in Ireland. If third level is totally free then demand for it increases. The State then must invest even more in infrastructure and increased staff levels so more cost. As matters stand the 3rd level institutions complain that because of the absence of fees they are underfunded compared to such institutions abroad. If the State is to invest further sums in 3rd level education then they must take it from elsewhere (first or second level which are already underfunded) or from other services provided by the State as I take it you do not want taxes further increased. Ireland is still borrowing money to fund day to day services. So the taxes we are paying do not fund the services we are receiving and Irish tax rates are still below the EU norm. If you want these services expect taxes to rise further especially on middle and lower income levels which by EU standards are still under-taxed. This is not going to happen.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ryan Carroll
    Favourite Ryan Carroll
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 3:32 PM

    Most of the EU-15 don’t charge for it, and most of the developed countries that do have some kind of state backed loan system so their students are not worried about money up front while they study, there is just no excuse for our policy.
    Don’t be naive, I’ve heard that argument that more fees = more funding and it’s utter horse1ht, that’s ignoring how the beast works, what will happen is the state will say to UCD, Trinity, DCU ”right you have your own fee system now, so you don’t need as much state funding” and state funding will go down, it will not stay at the same rate.

    The free fees scheme is nowhere near as expensive as half the stuff we pay for, it’s about 1/5th the cost of our welfare spending and dwarfed by our health spending, it’s NOT what is dragging down our budget and it never was.
    There are plenty of things to reform, the entry system and points system make people go for courses so they’ll ”get something” rather than a course they really value and want.

    Regardless, both govt parties made a contract with the electorate to abolish them up front and find a new funding model and were elected on that promise.
    What will happen if we go back to full fees is we’ll be back to a situation where only the wealthy can afford an education, or those absolutely dog poor enough to get a grant, and that latter group will be utterly tiny.
    The middle will be excluded again…the middle that pays all the taxes …and I think that’s unacceptable.

    37
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jean Martin
    Favourite Jean Martin
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:03 PM

    these comments from the UN make Ireland sound like some backward outpost in Eastern Europe run by lunatic fundamentalists……….sounds about right!

    235
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anne Marie Devlin
    Favourite Anne Marie Devlin
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:13 PM

    @Jean. They don’t. As far as I’m aware, abortion is allowed in those places. I can understand how people can get emotional about abortion for economic reasons or for other personal reasons. But what sort of person would deny medical intervention for ffa, cancer treatment for a mother, rape and incest? It’s barbaric.

    164
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ryan Carroll
    Favourite Ryan Carroll
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:08 PM

    The question people continue to torture themselves with is ”when does life begin”, but IMO that’s the wrong question, a plant is life, the question is when does person-hood begin. Lets try to answer that question in a scientific way without restoring to books written by bronze age middle easterners who didn’t know the world was a sphere.

    Surely the line is when a fetus/baby is capable of living independently from the mother, and thus that’s when it becomes a separate person with it’s own rights.
    Why not set the termination limit before that point and for anything AFTER that in what a doctor considers a medical emergency leave it up to them and their patient, we can’t legislate for every possible permutation of medical scenarios.
    The terminations are happening anyway, from an anti abortion perspective you are not saving a single bloody baby. To reduce the no of unwanted pregnancy’s all we need do is make contraception cheaper and easier, reform our welfare laws, and provide proper sex education (something left up to each individual school atm)

    It’s time to be grown ups about this.

    125
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Favourite Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 6:01 PM

    reform our welfare laws that sounds scary

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Favourite Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 6:24 PM

    come tell what u mean ? Is it social engineering ?

    4
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Favourite Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 7:38 PM

    weed out the minorities ? less productive ? those who are challenged and folks before ye all go off on one…. I am talking about comments above to ” reform our welfare laws ” as a means of reducing un- wanted pregnancies

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mary Kavanagh
    Favourite Mary Kavanagh
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:43 PM

    About time. I was shocked when I saw the new legislation in abortion. Apart from it being possible to have another Savita tragedy because of the flaw in the new legislation, to have a fourteen year sentence for procuring an abortion is outrageous in this day and age.

    115
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian Keelty
    Favourite Brian Keelty
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 12:55 PM

    The UN must take action against the war crimes being perpetrated in Gaza as we speak…………

    89
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seán Gallagher
    Favourite Seán Gallagher
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 12:57 PM

    I agree,

    It should, but given that the UN has over 44,000 staff. I’m relatively sure they can also handle a committee meeting and a report as well.

    104
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ryan Carroll
    Favourite Ryan Carroll
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:49 PM

    People need to stop thinking of the UN as this independent actor, aside from the sections that write reports like the human rights commission there is no ”UN” to go ”do” anything, the UN is just a forum for it’s members, and it has a fundamental design flaw in that it’s a hostage to 5 of it’s member states, the UN does not have it’s own forces.
    Even when the UN has decided to enforce the charter through force, in the Gulf War and Korea, it relied on other peoples forces, a coalition.

    Maybe an independent UN with it’s own forces would be better, but we don’t have that now

    36
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tricia Golden
    Favourite Tricia Golden
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:35 PM

    First stop, give us a chance to vote on repealing the 8th Amendment!

    I’ve NEVER been given the opportunity to vote on this issue (except ensuring I never vote for a “pro-life” politician) and I would like one. My voice has NOT been heard on this point.

    So please, I ask again, can we have a referendum to repeal that Amendment!

    64
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Roche
    Favourite Paul Roche
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:37 PM

    Here we go again.
    The UN is suggesting we rewrite our Constitution.
    So why don’t we?

    56
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Silent Majority
    Favourite Silent Majority
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:53 PM

    Spot on! The issue here is not abortion, the issue is a foreign, supranational organisation trying to dictate our constitution to us. Kindly F off, it is our constitution, you can criticise all you like but without OUR consent, it does not change.

    52
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emilio
    Favourite Emilio
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:54 PM

    Because the ever-shrinking anti-choice sector of the population still is big enough to pander to (big enough that if FF/FG lose their support, they’d no longer be the two parties that alternate government).

    The point where the size of this sector no longer makes such difference will be passed in the next 5-10 years and then Ireland will legislate.

    Ireland is a beautiful country but progressive it isn’t.

    74
    See 30 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emilio
    Favourite Emilio
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:55 PM

    As usual this Silent Majority is very loud and vocal. Funny, because as polls show time and time again, they are actually a Loud Minority. Go figure.

    60
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Silent Majority
    Favourite Silent Majority
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:57 PM

    As usual, you entirely miss the point emilio. I’d explain it again, but if you haven’t gotten it at this stage it’s unlikely you ever will.

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seán Gallagher
    Favourite Seán Gallagher
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:16 PM

    Silent Majority and Paul,

    Please explain the big problem with us signing charters to be held to a certain standard and opting in to be scrutinised by these organisation and then being scrutinised?

    We decided to do this, we decided that we wanted to be held to a standard. We cannot get annoyed when we then are.

    No one forced Ireland into the UN, you want to be gone from the UN then say that. But don’t question who they are to tell us what we should do… Because we invited them to.

    56
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Silent Majority
    Favourite Silent Majority
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:29 PM

    No problem with them questioning our laws, like the recent legislation. No problem with them questioning the potential sentences (14 years is pretty extreme) but our constitution is ours and ours alone. How far exactly do you think their remit should extend Sean? Should they be allowed dictate constitutional amendments, or just call for referenda?

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emilio
    Favourite Emilio
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:34 PM

    ” our constitution is ours and ours alone”

    Well, you are actually wrong. If our constitution goes against human rights (be that by a ruling of the European Court of Human Rights, for example) then no.

    Sick and tired of little muppets like yourself to be honest. Your point is provincial and inhumane. You have no point.

    52
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Silent Majority
    Favourite Silent Majority
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:39 PM

    As opposed to your intellectual contributions,devoid of fact but never devoid of ad hominem for anyone who dares disagree eh emilio? The Irish constitution may be amended solely by national referendum – I assume it would be asking too much for you to actually support your point that foreign courts can amend our constitution…

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emilio
    Favourite Emilio
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:46 PM

    The Irish constitution may only be amended by referendum, but that doesn’t mean the UN or the ECHR cannot tell Ireland that we must amend our constitution.

    By the way, the fact that not a single woman in reproductive age did ever vote for the 8th amendment should be an indication that our constitution might be outdated.

    Ireland’s current legal and constitutional framework is being criticised.

    The best you can do to defend its validity is that only the Irish can change it? Sure if it was a good framework you’d be able to defend it on its own merits, 1 year old or 1000 year old, irish-voted or not.

    But the best you can say is that it is Irish. You have no leg to stand on.

    35
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seán Gallagher
    Favourite Seán Gallagher
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:46 PM

    Well, in a word. Yes.

    We wanted to be a member state.
    We signed the UN Charters
    We agreed to and invited scrutiny

    If we don’t want that, then we can leave. I believe their remit should/does extend to recommendations. If you read the document (which I think someone linked) you won’t find in any of the section “a must”, a “need to” or a “have to”. It only ever says should.

    So what’s the problem? Is it the fact that some of it is in the constitution?

    Because if that’s the case, you hold very dear a very recent document, written for another time and one which we ourselves have amended (not even voted on but actually changed) a total of 33 times since this version was enacted in December of 1937, that’s an average of two amendments per year!

    33
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emilio
    Favourite Emilio
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:48 PM

    An average of 1 amendment every 2 years… sorry.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Silent Majority
    Favourite Silent Majority
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:50 PM

    Emilio, that’s exactly what it means. You’re managing to disagree with yourself. Don’t know why I bother trying to argue with people like you, but without the consent of the Irish people the constitution cannot be amended, no matter what the UN, ECHR or anyone else tells us.
    And “support your point” doesn’t mean “say what you just said again”. It means support your point with facts. In a country with free education there is no excuse for people like you.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Silent Majority
    Favourite Silent Majority
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:53 PM

    Sean, it’s not so much the current constitution I hold dear as the notion of constitutional democracy. I have no problem with amendments being made so long as those amendments are the will of the people. The Irish state may well have signed up to UN charters, but the constitution is the property of the people, not the state. Everyone here is getting caught up because abortion is the issue at hand, but it’s the interference in our constitutional procedures that bothers me.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emilio
    Favourite Emilio
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:57 PM

    ??

    Anyone in the universe can tell Ireland to change its constitution. From Joe the Plumber to Titan moon blobs. Can you not understand this? What, Irish constitution is free from criticism? And of course, you are entitled to say whatever you please. But don’t pretend the UN is rewriting our constitution because they are not.

    Of course it is Ireland’s task to change it, did I say otherwise? Your level of reading comprehension is abysmal, in a country with free education there is no excuse for people like you.

    Seán is making exactly the same point:

    “If we don’t want that, then we can leave. I believe their remit should/does extend to recommendations. If you read the document (which I think someone linked) you won’t find in any of the section “a must”, a “need to” or a “have to”. It only ever says should.”

    31
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seán Gallagher
    Favourite Seán Gallagher
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:59 PM

    They have made recommendations,

    They haven’t imposed their will, altered our constitution or compelled us to do so.

    They have said that we “should”. We are of course free to ignore their recommendations, but then again why would we?! This is a panel of people who are well versed in the law, ethics and practicalities of implementing these changes. Why wouldn’t we at least want to hear what they have to say on it.

    It’s our constitution to change, but it’s our responsibility to change it wisely, in a considered manner and after hearing the facts. That is the opportunity we have been presented.

    Also, despite it being our constitution to change, we sadly only get to do so when the government decide we do, in ways they decide and on issues that they decide, this at least might push the government to realise that there are a lotta people shouting on this who should have a voice in it, namely the people of Ireland.

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emilio
    Favourite Emilio
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:59 PM

    SM, there are no procedures in discussing changes to the constitution, only how to make the changes themselves (referendum).

    Discussing changes to the constitution can take place in the bar, in the dail, in the toilet, for all you care. And the UN and ECHR are perfectly valid actors in the scene of this discussions.

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute whynotme
    Favourite whynotme
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 3:47 PM

    Getting any sentence is pretty extreme

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Favourite Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 6:21 PM

    @Emilio you are in correct…. Irish Constitution cannot be changed unless its by referendum…also you do not seem to be able to tolerate other people having different opinions to you a true Liberal you are

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shanti
    Favourite Shanti
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 6:30 PM

    The UN can’t change our constitution – they can make recommendations, which we then ignore..

    The ruling from the ECHR was telling us to set out a framework to allow women to ascertain under which precise situations they were constitutionally entitled to abortion here – they didn’t tell us to change our constitution, they told us to legislate for it. They told us to codify our own law – they didn’t force anything on us that should not have been done already (20 years previously in fact).

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jack Ripper
    Favourite Jack Ripper
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 7:06 PM

    @Silent We signed up for this. This isn’t some external body imposing itself on Ireland. Ireland is part of this body.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Roche
    Favourite Paul Roche
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 8:58 PM

    Sean,
    You missed the point. It’s about national self determination. Alienation, because we are supposed to hold ourselves to be different, not because we joined a club of nations. We are expected to rule ourselves, not be ordered how to rule ourselves.
    We don’t rewrite our constitution because we choose not to do so. Was it all that hard to understand?

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Daly
    Favourite Michael Daly
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 9:29 PM

    Let’s be clear about this. There is no right to abortion in any international human rights law. This committee is interpreting things on an ideological basis. Its recommendations have no legal standing.

    If some international court or other body should seek to demand that we change our constitution it would be open to us to consider if the issue in question was of such importance that we wished to withdraw from the relevant organisation or convention. I believe that protection of human life from conception to natural death is of paramount importance.

    Yet again I see in these comments no concern expressed for the life lost in abortion. Somebody has to represent the rights of the unborn as guaranteed by the constitution and the pro-life movement will never cease to do that.

    And let me say that the idea that pro-life people are only concerned with the birth of the child and not its life thereafter is utterly repugnant to me. I of course can’t speak for everyone but I consider my pro-lifeism as including the right to a decent standard of living for everybody and equality of opportunity for everybody. I am as appalled as anybody by the poverty, homelessness, unemployment, poor healthcare etc which I exist in this country.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Favourite Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 9:32 PM

    Nicely patronising there Paul.

    Do you think that the Necklacing going on in many African countries, where they fill a tyre with petrol, place it around peoples necks and light it, because they are gay, adulterous or of the wrong religion, is ok? If not, who should do something about it, if their own police or government won’t?

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shanti
    Favourite Shanti
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 10:48 PM

    Michael.
    If you include a decent standard of living in your prolifeism then would I be correct to assume that you would be in favour of permitting abortion where the pregnancy is a) the result of rape or incest, b) doomed with a fatal diagnosis and c) when it may cause serious health complications for the woman (as any threat to her life would be a given), yes?
    Because that is what they are asking us to consider – not unrestricted abortion access.

    To force a woman to remain pregnant against her will in any of these situations would be a form of cruel and inhumane punishment.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Hagin Meade
    Favourite John Hagin Meade
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 11:00 PM

    @Silent Majority:

    If we DO have another referendum and for some reason the people vote against the UN suggestion, what then? will we have another referendum to get it right? Remember, we did this at least twice before. If we did hold a second, or third referendum and the result was still against the UN, what would they do? I am of the opinion that others, the UN and the EU think they can do what they like with us.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Daly
    Favourite Michael Daly
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 11:33 PM

    No Shanti you wouldn’t. I was merely addressing the point where pro-lifers are criticised for being only interested up to the point where the baby is born. Personally I stand over the current constitutional position. The intentional targeting of the life of the unborn is wrong in my opinion.

    You say that the UN committee is only recommending abortion in certain circumstances. However I am convinced that some people will not rest until the right to abortion on demand is conceded. While I appreciate your own bona fides in this regard I rather feel you are underestimating the danger of liberalising the law in any respect. You have probably seen references in the media to people who want the right to abortion in their own countries to be extended to post-birth situations where the child is not acceptable for one reason or another. It is difficult to be sanguine in such circumstances.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shanti
    Favourite Shanti
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 11:46 PM

    Are you referring to that ethics paper that compared abortion to infanticide?

    Because I have seen a lot of hooha about this from the pro life side, who seem to either a) be blissfully unaware of what the purpose of an ethics journal and therefore papers submitted to same is, or b) are well aware what they are for and are misrepresenting them on purpose in yet another fallacious attempt at emotional blackmail on those less clued in or inclined to track back the sources..

    I’m open to the possibility of other reasons, but truly to say that people are calling for this to be made legal is a massive misrepresentation of what the paper was, what it’s intentions were and even what it’s contents were.

    And ironically enough, the authors received death threats from the “pro life” movement over it. Doubtless the ones not critical enough to check the paper out before jumping to conclusions.

    And I repeat – do you actually think it’s acceptable to tell a woman who has been raped that her body is no longer her own? To force the birth of the product of incest? To make a woman carry the baby she wanted to term when it has no possibility of life? Or to tell a woman, “so what if this pregnancy may complicate an existing illness / have permanent negative consequences for your health”?

    Because that’s not giving much consideration to those women’s quality of life is it?

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Daly
    Favourite Michael Daly
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 12:25 AM

    Obviously death threats are entirely at odds with a pro-life position. I don’t recollect any reference to an ethics paper and I am pretty sure I’ve seen similar references in a number of places.

    I believe that from the moment of conception a second life enters the situation which life is worthy of protection. I believe it would do irreparable harm to the dignity and value of human life if abortion were allowed in any circumstances. However I would insist that any woman who found herself in the circumstances you describe would be given every possible support during and after the pregnancy. I know that won’t satisfy you and I regret that but I can’t go against my conscience.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shanti
    Favourite Shanti
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 12:43 AM

    The whole “arguing for post birth abortion” straw man originated from that ethics paper. I’m familiar with the argument, it’s put out there quite frequently. But no country has had such a proposition put to it’s legislature – that is an over exaggeration of what actually happened. It seems in your case, lack of knowledge of the source is to blame.

    Also, your conscience can rest easy, as you are presumably male – you will never directly be in the position where these things affect you, at best they will only ever affect you indirectly. As such, one would hope you would have respect for the consciences of other human beings and the fact that they have free will and a right to decide what happens within their own bodies.

    There are many women out there for whom pregnancy poses health risks, these women will be doing their level best to avoid pregnancy but no method of contraception is infallible and to suggest they remain celibate for their entire lives is laughable.
    There are families who want nothing more than a baby but the baby is not going to survive and there are scarred women who have already been violated and had their right to decide what goes on in their body violated – these women deserve precedence over the as yet contingent non sentient life gestating within them.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dee Writeful
    Favourite Dee Writeful
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 8:51 AM

    No, the issue here IS abortion

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dee Writeful
    Favourite Dee Writeful
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 8:59 AM

    also you do not seem to be able to tolerate other people having different opinions to you a true Liberal you are

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dee Writeful
    Favourite Dee Writeful
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 9:00 AM

    I refuse to tolerate pro-life opinions because not only are they invariably based on religious zealoutry, but they would deny women full human rights, which is intolerable to me. And most decent people. Why should I be asked to tolerate that?

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ted Carroll
    Favourite Ted Carroll
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:16 PM

    I completely agree with the UN’s findings but only as their views are aligned with my own, in general I wouldn’t take a bit of notice of what they say about anything. In relation to the group themselves I think they are a complete joke of an organisation and have proved time and time again to be completely toothless in basically every facet of their existence.

    How can a group pontificate about human rights when Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, Saudi Arabia are all fully fledged members. This thing has turned into a revenue generating exercise and is no longer fit for purpose.

    54
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ger Fleming
    Favourite Ger Fleming
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:05 PM

    Kevin you use of language in your comment says it all. Ignorance and intolerance.

    48
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gus Sheridan
    Favourite Gus Sheridan
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:11 PM

    Agreed Ger

    30
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin Foley
    Favourite Kevin Foley
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:16 PM

    It is nothing on intolerance just tired of interfering foreign agencies who think they know what is best for our country.

    Our laws, our society were build by us, and rightly or wrongly they reflect how the majority of Irish people want to live. As a nation if we want to change something it is our choice no one else’s.
    If someone does not like this they can always leave, no one is forced to live here.

    40
    See 5 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Gorman
    Favourite Dave Gorman
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:09 PM

    It is nothing on intolerance just tired of interfering foreign agencies who think they know what is best for our country.

    They’re hardly interfering. We signed up to be members of the UN. What’s the point of doing so if we ignore it? Shouldn’t we just cut all ties with them then?

    49
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seán Gallagher
    Favourite Seán Gallagher
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:11 PM

    Kevin,

    That’s a ridiculous position to adopt:

    “Hey, can we join your club for the betterment of everyone, through establishing standards and basic rights for all?”
    “Yeah, sure… Welcome.”
    “Cheers lads.”
    “By the way, we reckon that you have some stuff you should look at.”
    “Feck off, you can’t tell me what to do.”

    Ireland signed UN Charters, we decided to be subject to their scrutiny. We can’t get pissy when we don’t like what they tell us.

    73
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kev
    Favourite Kev
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:12 PM

    when something is wrong, its wrong. no matter who says it.

    41
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ryan Carroll
    Favourite Ryan Carroll
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:39 PM

    Our society has changed dramatically since 1983, it’s time to revisit this, many of us were not even alive then.
    It’s not just the Gen Y or X that are different, the older generations have changed.
    I was on the DART one day earlier in the summer. Some 17/18 year old with a mens health build, on his way home from rugby training sat down next to this grandmother type out of central casting, they knew each other.
    They talked about rugby cos he was semi-caked in mud even on his face and she asked him ”do you have a girlfriend yet Sean?” (a pause..looks at her) ”no”, ”any nice girls on the horizon then?”, ”All the time Mrs Redmond but they stay on that horizon cos I like guys”. He paused, was clearly thinking damn did I have to volunteer that. ”oh…(she looks him up and down stopping at chest level) you’d never think it Sean…that’s very metropolitan of you all together…any nice boys then?”
    ”I prefer to stick with the same few, less headcases, less pervy owllads”
    ”The pervy owllads aren’t new Sean, it’s just in our day they hurled that word at your side of the fence to throw the attention off themselves”

    We’ve changed…a lot, even 7-8 years ago that guy would have been firmly in the closet or faking it with birds.

    48
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Nell foran
    Favourite Nell foran
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 3:51 PM

    If the Irish people are so against abortion for these cases why are you afraid of a referendum then Kevin. You know time has moved on and so have the Irish people. No law or indeed section of the constitution is written in stone never subject to change by the will of the people. The vAst majority want legislation for abortion and removal of the 8th amendment.

    35
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sheik Yahbouti
    Favourite Sheik Yahbouti
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 3:16 PM

    Have read the article and the findings, with which I concur. Have avoided reading the comments, for reasons which are obvious. Can we please now arrange for the repeal of the dreaded amendment and move towards modern and rational legislation on this area? I cannot bear the thought of another campaign in which the lunatic (and well funded) fringe bombard the populace morning. noon and night with their extremely offensive remarks and articles. At my age, I have lived through several of these controversies and have even received the famous letters written in green ink in response to a letter I wrote to a newspaper, suggesting that contraception might be a matter for married couples to decide for themselves. Jesu, I actually wish I had preserved a few of those letters for posterity, as I am certain that people nowadays would find them hilarious. RTE and all the other media relish/fear what they see as “divisive” campaigns, although it is meat and drink to them. There has to be a remedy for these matters without inflicting endless tv programes involving Ms. Simmons, Mr. Mullen, Mr. Matthews. Mr. Binchy, Lucinda and all, which leave the average person alternating between boredom and fury. Can we please get out act together once and for all, and keep our noses out of other peoples’ personal business?

    43
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin Foley
    Favourite Kevin Foley
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:00 PM

    Ireland must do nothing. They are our laws they are clear and in my opinion fair.
    The government is addressing the care home question.
    Abortion.. enough said already the people of Ireland have spoken on numerous occasions, and their will is law.
    To the you in the nicest way please f##! Off

    42
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Nicky O'Donnell
    Favourite Nicky O'Donnell
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:03 PM

    Sorry, but an entire generation of young Irish voters that are predominantly pro-choice have had absolutely no opportunity to vote on this issue. The time for knuckle dragging religious conservatism has passed.

    191
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rowan Massey
    Favourite Rowan Massey
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:04 PM

    Human rights are subject to the will of the people though – which was exactly the point that was made. Also, some of our laws are not that fair in my opinion.

    79
    See 19 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rowan Massey
    Favourite Rowan Massey
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:05 PM

    apologies – aren’t subject to

    33
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin Foley
    Favourite Kevin Foley
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:09 PM

    No the population is more than just your “young voters” democracy is about the majority not the minority. The people voted a number of times and each time it was the same….. What do you want a nice treaty type vote ..keep asking until you get the answer you like? .. please

    27
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gus Sheridan
    Favourite Gus Sheridan
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:10 PM

    No more fudging the issue Inda, get on with and bring us into line with the present day for a change,

    64
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin Foley
    Favourite Kevin Foley
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:11 PM

    Was supposed to say to the UN .. auto correct :(

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ignoreland
    Favourite Ignoreland
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:11 PM

    Stop the press, Lads! Kevin says we shouldn’t do anything and he’s produced a detailed report in the comments section of thejournal.ie that destroys the detailed report produced by the UN Human Rights Committee.

    89
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Horan
    Favourite John Horan
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:11 PM

    Speak for yourself Kevin. I was too young to vote the last time it was put to the Irish public, in 2002, and even then it was just a question on whether we wanted to remove the risk of suicide.

    105
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ross Casey
    Favourite Ross Casey
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:13 PM

    @Kevin – “Ireland must do nothing” – are you serious? This is not an independent dictatorship. Ireland has a responsibility to all of its citizens.
    You sound like those countries content to harbour and shelter those who had commuted crimes against humanity by saying that we can do what we want.

    82
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alan Rooney
    Favourite Alan Rooney
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:18 PM

    I don’t remember a referendum taking place on the issue, never mind numerous! How else have the people of Ireland spoken?

    75
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Proinsias Ó Foghlú
    Favourite Proinsias Ó Foghlú
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:33 PM

    Kevin Ireland spoke once in 1983 on abortion!

    Since that time we have made the following changes:

    1992: passed right to travel and information provision and rejected the 12th amendment which would have put further restrictions on abortion.

    2002 rejected the removal of suicide as grounds for an abortion.

    Nobody under 49 years old has given their approval for the continuing ban on abortion and many polls have concluded that large majorities favour it in certain cirumstances!

    89
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emilio
    Favourite Emilio
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:47 PM

    If the 1983,1992 and 2002 referenda were to be voted again today, there would be no need for the 1992 or 2002. Abortion would have been decriminalised already.

    That’s why the young vote is pointed out, because it would change everything.

    52
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emilio
    Favourite Emilio
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:48 PM

    And, as Proinsias Ó Foghlú has pointed out, young means under 49 years old. Not under 25!

    49
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Horan
    Favourite John Horan
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:00 PM

    Honestly I think we should introduce citizen initiative like they have in Switzerland, where the people could force the government to hold a referendum on an issue by getting a certain number of people to sign a petition in favour of it. The constitution of the Irish free state had a system of citizen initiative, but it was never implemented in law and when people tried to use it to force the government to implement it, they removed the parts of the constitution regarding it (this was during a period where they were allowed to change the constitution without a referendum). When that constitution was replace with our current one, it didn’t include any initiative. This was also one of the things that the constitutional convention recommended introducing.

    So rather than the government keeping on introducing referendums till they get an outcome they are happy with, it would be the people who introduce the referendums, which seem appropriate to me.

    53
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stephen Earle
    Favourite Stephen Earle
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:20 PM

    If a woman wants an abortion it has nothing to do with you or the state. Its her body, her womb, her choice

    75
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David McDermott
    Favourite David McDermott
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:31 PM

    Sorry Kevin I think your information is off. The Irish electorate voted 31 years ago to the 8th amendment. That’s mean that any currently living Irish female of child bearing age has never had a say in the abortion debate as the Irish electorate has never been asked in a referendum to liberalize abortion laws. Something which would clearly pass by opinion polls, overwhelmingly in the case of fatal fetal abnormalities and rape and incest cases. Every referendum since 1983 regarding abortion which tried to make the abortion laws stricter has been defeated. The Irish electorate clearly favors more access to abortion.

    58
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ryan Carroll
    Favourite Ryan Carroll
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:45 PM

    @John that’s a great idea.

    We’ve never had an ‘ordinary’ referendum (non constitutional one) even though were allowed by our constitution, we’ve never used the Presidential power to refer bills to the people…

    The only caveat I’d have is that the referendums can’t contain appropriations, the Californians bankrupted themselves by voting for a load of expensive capital projects then voting down all the tax increasing needed to pay for them.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ian Welch
    Favourite Ian Welch
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:54 PM

    @ Kevin Foley

    There are people in their 30′s in this country who have never had an opportunity to vote on abortion. This is an anti-democracy scandal considering people under 30 are the group most affected by the abortion issue.

    The hope is that the elderly, church-fearing, uninformed, zealot demographic will soon die out and be replaced by a younger, modern, more tolerant demographic, who are capable of forming an opinion without asking their local priest what the official church stance is. It is therefore dispiriting when you see young people like yourself espousing the same knuckle-dragging, prehistoric, fascist nonsense as your grandparents no doubt espoused.

    Progressive Ireland me arse!

    36
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John R
    Favourite John R
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 3:17 PM

    Kevin, the choices of previous generations should not necessarily bind future generations. I remember the 1980s well and the bitter “culture wars” over divorce, abortion, contraception and homosexuality. It was a vile backward State and every time I recall it I still shudder with rage. I voted against the completely unnecessary abortion referendum and current voters deserve a similar opportunity. The relevant article should be completely removed from the Constitution and we should legislate for abortion. I believe such a proposal would overwhelmingly pass.

    31
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Favourite Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 5:57 PM

    You are correct in that it cals on the government to change our constitution… Thats in the peoples remit to change our constitution not in the government’s power. As chairman of this body is SIR somebody possibly he does not understand how a republic works.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Favourite Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 6:07 PM

    Its quite amusing to see correction of a typo been thumbed down….. its just shows the levels of bias in general on online discussion …. and the ” red thumbers ” would call themselves liberals…. I suspsect they are liberal providing you agree with them but have totally totalitarian attitudes if you hold a different view

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:36 PM

    The UN has no authority to impose abortion on this free nation. We are well able to set our own laws and moral codes.
    The UN has become the whipping boys of every liberal NGO in the world. Their failure to be productive in real battles, leaves them too much time in the realm of social theorising.
    They have lost the run of themselves, and are now an embarrassment to modernism. We have more war, famine, human trafficking, gendercide, and child abuse, than ever before; and these idiots are playing games with a free generous people who are committed to protecting both mother and child. Shame on them and on their liberal cronies.
    Their “dressing down” of Ireland was a shame on them; and whereas I don’t believe in the use of profanities, I believe Francis would hove been well justified in telling them where to go. Unfortunately Francis, probably agreed with them.

    34
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emilio
    Favourite Emilio
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:42 PM

    This free nation? Is that what makes you proud? Then why aren’t women free to make their choice about reproduction? The same evil reasons why we still can’t have abortion in Ireland are to blame for past blunders, like lack of contraception, or lack of sex education.

    This nation isn’t free.

    90
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Gorman
    Favourite Dave Gorman
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:45 PM

    The UN has no authority to impose abortion on this free nation. We are well able to set our own laws and moral codes.

    So put it to a referendum Paddy.

    64
    See 19 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:17 PM

    @ Emilio
    Ah Emilio, blindness of this nature is very sad. Why are we always elevating adult rights/choices over that of the child. Yes I’m very proud of our position up to Endas about turn last year. If he thinks elephants have long memories, wait until the next general election.
    We are indeed free to choose the culture of death, or the culture of life. I would hope our natural pride will not let us bow to such an inauspicious organisation, gives one the feeling of foreign masters again.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Gorman
    Favourite Dave Gorman
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:28 PM

    “We are indeed free to choose the culture of death, or the culture of life. I would hope our natural pride will not let us bow to such an inauspicious organisation, gives one the feeling of foreign masters again.”

    Rome or the UN?

    49
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emilio
    Favourite Emilio
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:37 PM

    Paddy, I am not the one who lives by a silly book that is all about death and what awaits you after you die.

    I do not elevate adult rights/choices over that of a child. I elevate women rights over that of a bunch of cells in her womb. Very different. But you have been indoctrinated in a very specific brand of delusion and you cannot see past this point. I wonder who is the blind one here.

    56
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dungeon Master
    Favourite Dungeon Master
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:39 PM

    NEWSFLASH Paddy,no one gives a sh*t what anti-choice people think except anti-choice people. Isn’t The Vatican a foreign power imposing it’s dogma and policies on Ireland?

    60
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dungeon Master
    Favourite Dungeon Master
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:45 PM

    Also Paddy the great pro-lifer who has no Catholic Comment on real live children getting slaughtered in Gaza,geopolitics must not be on the Indoctrination Course

    44
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Liam
    Favourite Liam
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 3:07 PM

    @ Paddy – “We have more war, famine, human trafficking, gendercide, and child abuse, than ever before;” Well Paddy that is certainly not true. Over recent time violence has dropped dramatically and we are now likely living in the most peaceful time in our existence, as pointed out by cognitive scientist Steven Pinker:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ramBFRt1Uzk

    And his book on the issue of the decline in violence is well worth a read:

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Better-Angels-Our-Nature-Violence-ebook/dp/B005HHSYMW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1406209890&sr=8-1&keywords=the+better+angels+of+our+nature

    Also you say that “free generous people who are committed to protecting both mother and child. Shame on them and on their liberal cronies.” Yet even a brief look at recent history of this state shows otherwise. Women in this country were, for a very long time, treated like farm animals in terms of their bodies and their say in such matters. Now as religion is declining (thankfully so) the rights of women as well as minorities are finally being implemented. It is said that in thirty years time there could be as little as only 450 Catholic priests left in Ireland, if that is the case, the people of Ireland will benefit from it immensely.

    Also thousands of children (perhaps more) were systematically raped by the people who were charged with protecting them, so no, you are yet again wrong on this. Women and children were not protected in this country and to say otherwise shows a severe lack of respect for the countless people who suffered at the hands of religious fanatics.

    The sad state of affairs in this country is that a man’s sexual health is between him & his doctor. A woman’s sexual health is between her government & the religious right. THIS IS WRONG and it must change.

    46
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 3:53 PM

    @ Emilio
    Next time you meet an expectant mum, wish her well with her “clump of cells”. It’s just an expression you use to make yourself feel comfortable with your self deceit.
    @ Dungeon Master
    As you know, the Vatican is only a moral voice, not an imposing power in any shape or form. I tend not to comment on Gaza, as I see wrong on both sides, one sure way of annoying everyone.
    @ Liam
    There are about 130 wars in the world at the moment, add to this the war on the unborn with 3,700 being killed daily.
    There is widespread institutional abuse today, never mind our past. Look at the numbers of persons in care of the HSE who die yearly. Our government now wants to redefine marriage as purely a transitional emotional commitment, and in the process state regulate that children have no rights to knowledge of their biological parents.
    Peaceful! Dream on. Redefining what is war, murder, or abuse; may relieve our consciences but doesn’t change facts.

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Gorman
    Favourite Dave Gorman
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 4:16 PM

    “As you know, the Vatican is only a moral voice, not an imposing power in any shape or form.”

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

    33
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shanti
    Favourite Shanti
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 6:24 PM

    Er Paddy, the state is actually making a larger effort to ensure that kids know where they came from.. Why is it that you rely on these emotionally manipulative and downright dishonest arguments?
    We will have a referendum on marriage equality – when it passes it will be because the Irish people voted for it.

    In order for 40.3.3 to be repealed it must go to referendum, so if it is repealed again – it will be because the Irish people voted to do so.

    So why does allowing people in this supposedly free nation vote on these matters bother you so much?

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 7:15 PM

    @ Shanti
    With gay marriage comes surrogacy. With surrogacy comes children separated permanently from one or both biological parents. Not only are the government supporting the redefinition of marriage, but they are working up legislation to facilitate surrogacy. Their legislation is aimed at “fixing” the child debate around gay marriage. Most antidemocratic of them, telling the people they can choose, and then promoting this legislation before the referendum.
    There will of course be very few surrogates in Ireland, and the cheaper option in the womb farms of India will be the preferred option.
    These children, the bought children, will not be entitled to their genealogy if our state facilitates such surrogacy. In thirty years what crocodile tears will be spilled for the injustice we are about to inflict on this next generation of children. What will we do when we can’t blame the church for the bad decisions we make as a nation.
    So the emotion touted with gay couples sighing for marriage is ok, but I’m using unfair emotion to point out we are creating a new generation of fatherless of motherless humans! (State approved)
    The philanthropist sponsored NGOs who are pro abortion, encamp about the UN, staffed with radical feminists and liberals, to imply abortion is a new human right; and the UN has the audacity to imply we should join the western culture of culling children. We should kick them off of our island, and sterilise the ground they stood on.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 7:16 PM

    @ Shanti
    The liberal push to get rid of 40.3.3 may well get to a vote with the marketing effort by the liberals to convince us how stupid we are. But the Irish have shown respect for life before, and one can only hope they will do so again. I have very little hope in our politicians resisting the lobbying, but the intelligence of the Irish voter may win out and protect all of our people, including the child in the womb.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ciarán Masterson
    Favourite Ciarán Masterson
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 7:27 PM

    @Paddy Scully

    “There is widespread institutional abuse today, never mind our past. Look at the numbers of persons in care of the HSE who die yearly. Our government now wants to redefine marriage as purely a transitional emotional commitment, and in the process state regulate that children have no rights to knowledge of their biological parents.”

    The deaths of people in HSE care have been caused by the taking of illegal drugs, overdose of legal drugs, suicide, car accidents, natural causes and killing by persons not affiliated with the HSE. Therefore, the HSE didn’t cause those deaths.

    Furthermore, with regard to knowledge of biological parents, women who were compelled to give their children up for adoption have a constitutional right to privacy. It is an event that they may find too traumatic to revisit. Therefore, giving adopted the children the absolute right to know their biological mothers wouldn’t be good for the biological mothers or the adopted children. In cases where adopted children want to contact their biological parents and vice versa, contact should be conducted via a third party.

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shanti
    Favourite Shanti
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 7:32 PM

    Lol..
    Ok, for one – not all gay couples want kids. Same way not all hetero couples do.

    Two, adoption and surrogacy already exist – even without gay couples! Do you heap the same amount of scorn upon hetero couples who use surrogacy?
    To my understanding the idea behind the new law was to ensure that a) exploitation of birthing mothers was eradicated and b) the child will always be able to access information on their biological parents.. But hey – trust you to completely misrepresent the truth in order to manipulate agreement with your ideals.

    And 40.3.3 needs to go. Maybe you agree with the torture meted out on pregnant rape / incest victims or couples faced with an FFA diagnosis, but most decent people realise that’s just taking the foetus obsession a little too far. I concede – there isn’t a huge support for unrestricted abortion access, but in order to allow for abortion in any situation outside of life and death 40.3.3 must go. It seems those “pro life” aren’t concerned with the myriad health complications experienced by women in pregnancy, some of which can be permanent – you seem to be of the opinion that you should be able to condemn a woman to disability purely because of your preoccupation with the contents of her womb.

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shanti
    Favourite Shanti
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 7:47 PM

    Oh and ps Paddy – the reason they are sorting out the areas of adoption and surrogacy is because;
    A) they’re separate to marriage, and shouldn’t be used as a red herring by anyone in the marriage equality debate.
    B) these are things that require legislative changes regardless of whether the marriage referendum is passed or not.

    You wouldn’t want to discriminate against the already existing children of gay couples would you? I mean, single gay people can adopt – why not gay couples too? What happens when that single gay parent enters a civil partnership? Their partner can’t adopt their kids – if that was a straight single parent who got married their new partner could adopt their kids, why not a gay couple? Is it purely because they are gay?

    I won’t even start on the many complications that make the bar on gay adoption hazardous for the children.. But if you think necessitating children being made a ward of the state in an emergency rather than just allow the person they consider to be their parent be their legal guardian I really struggle to see your logic.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Favourite Ailbhe O'Nolan
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 9:09 PM

    Hey Paddy, genuine questions:
    Is it frightening knowing the outdated, hurtful and harmful views you hold are in decline in wider society, and that soon they will be a thing of the past?

    Will you then become a grumpy old git, saying things like, ‘back in my day, we could legally discriminate, not to mention, force women to become no more than incubators when pregnant’?

    17
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 12:57 AM

    @ Ciarán Masterson
    You are right in many respects. Some fault however still lies with our institutions and us, even today. They are often so overwhelmed by their workload, that they can never substitute for the care and attention a child would get from its biological parents when things are right. So in that way, not deliberately but often by natural limitations, the HSE contributed to the death of these children. As the HSE only represents us, then we all have culpability. The liberal critics were not as forgiving of the nuns however, when many died in there care, often from virulent diseases, pre antibiotics.
    The compulsion women felt to give up their children at that time, was the result of a throwback to Victorianism that had a big impact on the Irish psyche. The one thing that is clear from all the media examples is the appetite people have to know their biology. It is one thing for this to occur unplanned, but for the state to deliberately create parenting situations which create a demand for children who will be, by state decree, fatherless or motherless is a completely different scenario. This is a new state approved/designed form of depravity. And them to call it marriage! In this new arrangement, there is no register the child can come to, to see if they have a parent looking for them; just a sperm bank and/or an off the shelf egg from Eastern Europe.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 12:58 AM

    @ Shanti
    Lol all you want, its good for the heart.
    International human rights tie marriage and the right to have children together, so with gay marriage (as opposed to partnership) comes the expectation or even right to have/purchase children. There is plenty evidence of the rush to the surrogacy farms in each country/state when gay marriage was introduced. Yes I do disapprove of IVF and surrogacy as a general rule. There is growing evidence of increased risk of health problems among surrogates. You are also aware of the many embryos that are created and lost for each successful IVF child.
    40.3.3, does not have to go. Our constitution still overrules all other requests or obligations, real or imaginary. This is the decision of the Irish people. Thank God we have a constitution, that half protects us from politicians on a mission.
    I never discriminated against the children of gay couples, their parents did that when they manufactured/bought them. It wasn’t my choice, or the States choice heather too fore, that they be fatherless or motherless.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paddy Scully
    Favourite Paddy Scully
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 12:59 AM

    @ Ailbhe O’Nolan
    I have no reason to be frightened myself Ailbhe. What the state sows it will reap. I’d prefer to be outdated and correct any day, to being modern and incorrect.
    When you say “Will you then become a grumpy old git”, that carries with it the assumption I am not already. But no, I smile, joke and laugh; much more than your average bear. I have much to be happy and joyful about. Should I apologise?

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shanti
    Favourite Shanti
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 8:25 AM

    There you go again Paddy.. Lying through your teeth..
    The women in the magdalen laundries didn’t “feel a compulsion” to give up their children – they were FORCED. By people spouting the same beliefs as you.
    Mounting evidence of health issues from surrogacy? Massive rushes to this method with the introduction of marriage equality elsewhere – what have I and many others told you about making these statements Paddy? You haven’t backed any of them up, and going on past experience you won’t either – you’re just throwing out whatever you can to try and bolster your argument which is based on no more than lies.
    40.3.3 needs to go. Us women – we are not just vessels.

    And interesting you’re against IVF, says quite a lot about you.. Would you preclude those who cannot conceive from marriage too? After all, you’d happily preclude them from IVF..

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rowan Massey
    Favourite Rowan Massey
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 12:51 PM

    Do you have the link to the entire report at all?

    27
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sophie
    Favourite Sophie
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:23 PM
    27
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute cosmological
    Favourite cosmological
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 12:56 PM

    It’s always kicking and screaming.

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ChocSaltyBallz
    Favourite ChocSaltyBallz
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:06 PM

    Do they realise this is a catholic country or at least run by them !

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ger Fleming
    Favourite Ger Fleming
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:23 PM

    Catholic in name maybe. Our recent history re homelessness , poverty, health and welfare and many other social issues would make the founder of Christianity shudder. Didnt he allegedly say ” love your neighbour as you love yourself”. In my opinion that translates in respect other people’s choices and beliefs.

    58
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ryan Carroll
    Favourite Ryan Carroll
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 3:01 PM

    This is what the Bible says about abortion:

    ”and when he hath made her drink the water, then it shall come to pass that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water shall causith the curse to enter into her and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thighs shall rot, and the woman shall be a curse among her people, and if the woman be not defiled, but be clean, she shall be free, and conceive seed”

    -Numbers 5:21-2, 27-28

    translation:

    ”if your wife cheating on you, make a potion to trigger an abortion, if it’s the other dudes kid, she will miscarry, and will then be the scandal of the town because it’s clear she’s a cheater, if it’s yours, she won’t”

    Yes the biblical God is very worried about the unborn…cos ye see it’s sacred life..unless it’s the baby of some cheater and some random dude…then it’s…not sacred I guess and f-k that fetus?

    So then we turn to the next bit…

    ”numbers the children of levi after the house of their fathers, by their family’s, every one from a month upward shalt thou number them, and Moses numbered them according to the word of the LORD!”….this is the bible saying not only does a fetus not count…but a newborn does not yet count!!
    Now of course the real reason for that is the bible was written in the broze age where newborns often died within days or weeks….and it’s not reason to allow a fourth trimester abortion…so how do we know that a fourth trimester abortion would be disgusting murder? Because our morality did NOT come from the bible, it came from socialization and civilization processes tempered by biology, which together created an independent moral compass…so enough with the religious arguments for this.

    39
    See 9 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rob Cahill
    Favourite Rob Cahill
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 3:51 PM

    It’s not a Catholic Country. It’s a country that was abused by the RCC for a long time. This is a republic and a democracy. If you was a theocracy go to North Korea or wait a few years and try the USA.

    31
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seán Ó Briain
    Favourite Seán Ó Briain
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 5:32 PM

    Ireland is not a “Catholic Country”. It is a secular republic, thank you very much.

    29
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ger Fleming
    Favourite Ger Fleming
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 5:33 PM

    Well said and good research. Agree.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Neal Ireland Hello
    Favourite Neal Ireland Hello
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 5:54 PM

    It’s not a catholic country. It’s a country where grown adults who have long since lost all interest in religion still have church weddings, christenings and funerals because they’re afraid to upset their mummies.

    24
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Favourite Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 5:59 PM

    What does a secular republic mean though ? Is it just non religous or is it a true republic of equals where all citizens are cherished equally ?

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tricia Golden
    Favourite Tricia Golden
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 6:38 PM

    When you say “citizens are cherished equally” who are you referring to? I’m a citizen of this country. Are you suggesting that were I to fall pregnant the foetus or baby (whatever you want to call it) becomes a full citizen, with all the accompanying rights, at conception? Which automatically seriously infringes my rights as a citizen.

    If I had a very rare blood type should I be forced to give blood because I can, quite literally, cause a person to die if they don’t get a blood transfusion? What if the reason they were dying was because I accidentally ran them over. I didn’t MEAN to but I did. Should I be FORCED, against my wishes to give that person a blood transfusion? Or does that seriously infringe my right to bodily autonomy?

    Should we take organs from dead bodies to save other peoples lives? Against their or their families wishes? Of course not.

    But apparently the second I fall pregnant I HAVE to continue “giving life” to that pregnancy. I “shouldn’t” be allowed to decide whether I WANT to continue. I have to give up my bodily autonomy.

    No. My rights as a citizen trump the rights of any foetus.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Favourite Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 7:30 PM

    Tricia i am suggesting nothing… I am asking what does a secular republic mean ? It appears to mean been anti any religion.. I am wondering does it mean ” cherishing all persons” equally as a republic should

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shanti
    Favourite Shanti
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 7:38 PM

    I don’t think we are a secular republic.. If we were we wouldn’t have a church monopoly on our education system..
    Even going on the census figures the RCC church is massively over represented..

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shanti
    Favourite Shanti
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 7:38 PM

    Plus, our elected officials wouldn’t be required to say oaths on a bible..

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Neal Ireland Hello
    Favourite Neal Ireland Hello
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 1:49 PM

    How about we make our own laws in accordance with our own culture and the UN fecks off and sorts out the Middle East or something?

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seán Gallagher
    Favourite Seán Gallagher
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 2:22 PM

    Ok Neal,

    If that’s the way it’s to be, then let’s have a referendum on abortion.

    50
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Neal Ireland Hello
    Favourite Neal Ireland Hello
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 3:24 PM

    I’ll see what I can do.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mini Miss
    Favourite Mini Miss
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 7:02 AM

    On the issue of abortion, I personally feel it should be solely up to the pregnant woman involved. If you are against abortion, don’t have one. If you feel you need one then have one. Our bodies, our minds, no one else need interfere.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dee Writeful
    Favourite Dee Writeful
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 9:04 AM

    I kept my eyes out for Youth Defence at the vigil for murdered palestinians there on Wednesday but didn’t see them. Strange, because aren’t there usually around 750,000,000,000 of them at rallies to do with life and death?

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Elaine Ryan
    Favourite Elaine Ryan
    Report
    Jul 25th 2014, 8:47 AM

    Tell me if I’m wrong if you want. But I do believe that if a women wants to have an abortion it is her right, it’s her body, she has to live with the decision she has made for the rest of her life. Maybe it will be the right one or maybe she will live to regret it. But if for what ever reason a women feels abortion is the only option then she has that right. But if abortion was to be allowed, then one abortion is all any women should be allowed, if they get themselves pregnant time and time again and keep thinking I’ll have an abortion, get rid of the problem, that’s where I don’t agree. I have never being in the suituation where I’d feel helpless that an abortion was my only option, finding out your pregnant is scary enough, then to have to make a decision to abort the baby, no one can understand that unless you have gone through it.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Favourite Caoimhin O Hailpin
    Report
    Jul 24th 2014, 6:09 PM

    Sheik do you believe people who disagree with you have a right to their opinions ?

    3
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds