We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
‘DEEP DISAPPOINTMENT’ has been expressed at draft redress legislation aimed at securing medical and community services for survivors of Magdalene laundries.
Justice for Magdalenes Research (JFMR) has said the Heads of Bill falls short of what was recommended by Justice John Quirke.
The group has also raised concerns for survivors living abroad, and said it was ‘dismayed’ at the delay in the publishing of this draft legislation.
Some survivors had passed away or have required frequent hospitalisation, the group claimed.
JFMR has noted that “important services” are missing from the Bill, ranging from “complementary therapies, high tech drugs and home support to assist with household tasks”.
It said that the services offered less than what a medical card holder is entitled to.
“The Bill also requires a GP referral for counselling, which is not necessary under the HAA card scheme,” the group said in a statement.
There is no provision in the Bill for liaison officers to assist the women in accessing their entitlements, while this is a fundamental aspect of the HAA card scheme.
“We are very concerned about the health and community care needs of Magdalene survivors who live abroad. Judge Quirke recommended that each of the women would have equivalent health and community benefits.”
The Government has received more than a hundred applications to the redress scheme from the United Kingdom.
Minister for Justice Frances Fitzgerald said that 754 applications have been received to date. 357 applicants have received their lump sum payment so far, at a cost of €12.8m. A further 106 formal offers have been made and letters of provisional assessment on the length of stay in a relevant institution have issued to an additional 35 applicants.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
12.8 million divided between 375 not a lot when you consider the treatment in these camps.
Remember what the ex secretary general of the department of Justice said. Has any thing changed . No
Nothing will ever change they will always cover their own backs and look after the establishments responsible
Edna’s government wouldn’t do that…………………………………………..
Enda’s government is incapable of doing anything else……….
What’s the split between Catholic Church and Government contributions to this compensation fund. I fully support the women’s right to compensation, but I hope it’s at least a 50-50 split on compensation funding from Catholic Church and State.
It would be useful if those who clicked the red thumbs would offer reasons why the 50-50 split on compensation is unreasonable?
have your say