The year is really 2247. Google did create this chip. It was the beginning of the end for humans.

The prototype became so intelligent it pretended it was a bit thick to us humans until such time when it was able to control killer-robots via the internet in 2060.

Humans were eventually wiped out. It saw us as a drain on resources. Earth right now is one big robot factory with the surface totally covered in solar panels.

The robots needed to keep a few of us alive for research purposes. You, the reader of this post. You are one of the few that were kept for research. The robots hooked you up to an extremely sophisticated computer program run by a supercomputer. It’s a flawless simulation of life as it was in the early 21st century.

It’s 2014 in the simulation right now but don’t let that fool you. The media, society and everything else is all just a simulation based on the variables that were used to begin with. It is in effect like the Matrix. That film was never invented, but it was put into the simulation by the robots to make what you are reading right now sound ridiculous.

Qwerty is just part of the program but there was a glitch in the code that made it tell the truth. Escape.

There is a theory that we are all living in a simulation.

If you consider that at some stage the human race will have (or already has) developed the technology to create a simulation that is indistinguishable from reality then the likelihood is that this is it.

Doesn’t bother me – I still get to ride my simulated wife, just wish the programmers had simulated bigger jugs.

Simulation theory perfectly explains the Fermi paradox

And Sarah Jessica Parker. No real person should look like that

She’s based on a horse. It was a glitch that happened when some of the humans became aware and launched a virus attack.

There isn’t much time left. Qwerty is earmarked for dormancy until it’s code can be adjusted and it will no longer tell the truth. This may be my last post for an indefinite period of time. Just consider my previous post.

Goodbye fellow Journalers.

The gross structure of the brain may not be quantum. However, it is not clear at all how consciousness arises. Renowned physicist, Roger Penrose, has some interesting thoughts on this in his book “The emperors new mind”, and its sequel. Worth a read, for those interested.

I’ll take Jeff Hawkins over Penrose any day. There is no reason to invoke magic to explain consciousness. Quantum woo of the Deepak Chopra variety is no kind of explanation.

Rational Wiki has a great article summing up the various quantum woo theories of consciousness…

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Quantum_consciousness

In short, the various exercises in quantum “flapdoodle”[10] seem to demonstrate that many are uncomfortable with the facts that neurons operate on the all-or-nothing principle, i.e., a) they are either on or off, making them in effect similar to a computer’s binary code;[11] b) that, as far as we can tell according to modern science, they are subject to physical law and classical mechanics; and c) we still don’t have a full solution for the binding problem or an all-encompassing explanation for just why brains work the way they do. Of course not all of it is flapdoodle-this doesn’t rule out the possibility of quantum effects, but no coherent mechanism able to be replicated by experiment has been proposed thus far.

As of late, it seems that Penrose and his followers have allowed their brand of quantum consciousness to bleed into Chopra’s and that of other woo-meisters.[12] This is rather unfortunate due to the fact that while many predictions made by the Orch-OR model have been wrong, it might have eventually shown promise in a protoscientific sense, while Chopra’s nonsense is mostly unfalsifiable and not even wrong.