Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

AP/Press Association Images

Near Misses: 'The US were lucky to get out of the Cold War without a nuclear detonation'

“The problem with luck is that eventually it runs out.”

WHEN A NUCLEAR bomb landed in the Gregg yard in South Carolina in 1958, it left a big crater, killed a few chickens, caused the family minor injuries and wrecked their Chevrolet.

Luckily, the device that had fallen out of a B-47 bomber after Captain Bruce Kulka accidentally grabbed a lever opening the bomb bay — almost falling out himself — was not fully armed with a fissile core.

But other US aircraft routinely flew carrying fully-primed nuclear weapons, and the incident, as highlighted in this week’s international conference on nuclear weapons in Vienna, was far from isolated.

“We were lucky to get out of the Cold War without a nuclear detonation,” US author Eric Schlosser, who recounts this episode and many others in his recent book Command and Control, told the gathering.

“The problem with luck is that eventually it runs out,” said Schlosser, who spent six years researching his book, sifting through thousands of pages of documents obtained through the Freedom of Information act and interviewing a range of senior figures.

One switch away

In another case in 1961, a B-52 bomber broke up in the air and went into a spin. The resulting centrifugal forces pulled a lanyard that released a fully operational hydrogen bomb — a super-powerful nuclear bomb — over North Carolina.

“There was one switch in that weapon that prevented the full-scale detonation of a hydrogen bomb hundreds of times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb” dropped by the US on Japan on 1945, Schlosser said.

And in 1968, a B-52 bomber carrying four hydrogen bombs crashed near the Thule air base in Greenland.

The conventional explosives surrounding the nuclear core exploded, but a full nuclear explosion was averted, although radioactive plutonium was dispersed in the area and part of one of the bombs was never recovered.

In 1980 Zbigniew Brzezinski, former US national security adviser, was woken up at 2.30am to be told of 220 — then corrected to 2,200 — incoming Russian nuclear missiles.

Brzezinski was about to phone president Jimmy Carter, and US bomber crews had already started their engines, when the all-clear came through. The false alarm was triggered by a faulty microchip costing less than 50 cents.

U.S. President Jimmy Carter Zbigniew Brzezinski holds out a piece of paper for President Jimmy Carter as he and Vice President Walter F. Mondale cross the South Lawn of the White House on 2 November 1980. AP / Press Association Images AP / Press Association Images / Press Association Images

Thing of the past?

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union 25 years ago, nuclear arsenals have been slashed, and technological advances and security improvements have reduced the chances of an accident.

The US says its missiles are pointed to land in the middle of the ocean. Its combat aircraft no longer routinely have nuclear bombs on board.

But there are believed to remain 16,300 nuclear weapons worldwide in the hands of nine countries, 1,800 of them ready to be launched at short notice, and experts say that major causes for concern persist.

The nuclear warheads themselves may be more modern, but the equipment that carries them — missiles, aircraft and submarines — are antiquated, and incidents still happen.

In France, for example, there have been security breaches at the Isle Longue nuclear submarine base, and in 2009 two British and a French nuclear sub reportedly collided, said Jean-Marie Collin, head of a group representing 20 French MPs calling for disarmament.

Britain’s Daily Express reported this week that there have been 44 fires on board Royal Navy submarines in the past four years.

But most worryingly, said Bruce Blair, a former US control officer for nuclear missiles now at Princeton University, the time needed to deploy a nuclear weapons is being cut, putting them on dangerous “hair-trigger readiness”.

“Russia has shortened the launch time by automating the firing process. High command posts in the Moscow area need only seconds to directly fire missiles out of silos as far away as Siberia,” Blair said.

Cyber danger

This in turn increases the risk from another area barely known about in the Cold War — cyberattacks, said Camille M. Francois, an expert in the field at Harvard Law School’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society.

With their high level of automation, “nuclear assets are by their nature extremely vulnerable to cyberattack,” Francois said.

And in addition, she told AFP, policymakers still have something of a 1980s mentality, focusing on the idea of a lone hacker — like in the 1983 movie WarGames — and believing that cyber attacks can only come via the Internet.

It’s not kids anymore, it is states investing very heavily in cyber warfare. This is the new battlefield, the fifth domain of war.

Former US State Department official Mark Fitzpatrick, now at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, told AFP that the fact that there has never been a nuclear explosion by accident, mistake or miscalculation “suggests that the weapons custodians take their task seriously”.

“On the other hand, I think the world has been very lucky not to have experienced such an occurrence … The urgency of the issue can be exaggerated, but I would not discount the risks or the devastating consequences of failure.”

“Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons ever made,” Schlosser told AFP. “This technology has never been under our control since the very beginning.”

- © AFP, 2014

If North Korea did hack Sony, it’s a watershed moment in cyber-warfare

Opinion: Is it time for Ireland to embrace nuclear energy?

Author
View 23 comments
Close
23 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Secret Irishman
    Favourite Secret Irishman
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 4:48 PM

    Only the Americans could bloody accidentally nuke themselves. Friendly fire and all that, they love it.

    64
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Silver Planet
    Favourite Silver Planet
    Report
    Dec 15th 2014, 2:41 AM

    I wouldn’t be any more surprised if Pakistan, India, Russia or a few others managed it

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Silver Planet
    Favourite Silver Planet
    Report
    Dec 15th 2014, 2:42 AM

    By the way – the Americans didn’t do it

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Briain O'Dochartaigh
    Favourite Briain O'Dochartaigh
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 4:46 PM

    Great movie very relavent to article ” countdown to zero” well worth a watch

    49
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eamonn Byrne
    Favourite Eamonn Byrne
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 8:59 PM

    Thanks for the recommendation I’ll check it out

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Horgay H
    Favourite Horgay H
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 4:51 PM

    “The US says it’s missiles are pointed to land in the middle of the ocean.” WTF? Who believes for an iota that such missiles are aimed at nothing.

    The Russian Mach 4 nuclear missiles would wreak havoc on any state and their Mach 5 systems coming online in 2017 will be unstoppable by any missile defence system. The US is playing a dangerous game supporting a fascist government in Ukraine with its ‘fu*k the EU’ comments and kindly providing $5 billion to democracy in Ukraine, expecting nothing in return, in a country where people get by on $160 a month.

    If we do have a nuclear war, that is it for all of us. The weapons today are so powerful that it would only take a handful of detonations to wipe out/severely reduce humanity.

    41
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Declan Noonan
    Favourite Declan Noonan
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 8:44 PM

    Horgay, I sense your admiration for Russia’s nuclear capability while you condemn the American capability. You are a idiot.

    32
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mark Bannon
    Favourite Mark Bannon
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 7:09 PM

    “Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons ever made” That’s only because nobody’s trained sharks with laser beams on the heads!

    31
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Repeating history
    Favourite Repeating history
    Report
    Jan 1st 2015, 8:37 PM

    Although some have been trained to carry hammers on their head

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute TonyFlynn
    Favourite TonyFlynn
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 6:54 PM

    The call for nuclear disarmament is all part of an alien plot. I have it from a good source (who may or may not have been a member of a sibling band from Dundalk) that nuclear weapons are the only reason we haven’t been harvested for our gooey goodness already.

    *puts on tinfoil hat*

    28
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chris Kirk
    Favourite Chris Kirk
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 5:16 PM

    Shit happens Horgay, when Russia wants ro play fast and loose with their nuclear missiles then you can be sure that others in the West will aim to please.

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cultural Bolshevism
    Favourite Cultural Bolshevism
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 5:28 PM

    You may thank Vasili Arkhipov that you’re here today Mr.Kirk , those pesky Russians huh ! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2208342/Soviet-submariner-single-handedly-averted-WWIII-height-Cuban-Missile-Crisis.html

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Isaac Smyth
    Favourite Isaac Smyth
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 6:29 PM

    Chris do you lay awake at night dreaming of dead Russian children with a smile on your face? The Americans are they only country to ever Use nukes on another country – Twice.

    29
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Simon Jester
    Favourite Simon Jester
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 10:21 PM

    No one heard of operation Able Archer??
    Nov 1983 Russia almost started ww3 because of their own paranoia.
    Able Archer was a NATO exercise that was conducted just by radio traffic in Germany,Russia and East Germany started beliving that various code words and the coincidential disapperance of certain key NATO generals and personel was signs of an imminent military strike by the West on the Warsaw pact forces.They got so paranoid that East German forces were mobilised onto a war footing and the East Germans brought the tactical nukes out of storage and armed their MIGs and had them on the flight lines ready to go on a 4 minute notice to hit targets in West Germany. The Russians and the East belived when the radio traffic ceased on the conclusion of Able Archer that this is when NATO would strike…It duly did end and there was no movement or strike by the West….Except utter panic and WTFisms to the Kremlin when it was seen that the ICBM doors were openedin Siberia and the backfire bombers were suddenly flying en masse off the Kola peninsula!!!
    This is one of the main reasons Ronnie Reagan made a unexpected tour of West Germany and Berlin in Dec 1983 almost a week later,to show the East that we werent planning anything nasty.

    How about Ex Col Stanislav Petrov of the Soviet Rocket forces??If it hadn’t been for Col Petrovs coolness and willingness to question a doomsday order,caused by a POS soviet era computor in Sept 1983 we would be proably be scratching our commentary out on a cave wall somewhere.

    All in all the Soviets had just as many blunders and fk ups as the USA,and proably many more as they didn’t exacly allow publicity of their screw ups,right up to the time the Kursk blew up and sank in 2000.
    It might behove the Journal.ie to publish a few of them as well in impartiality and fairness???Somehow I doubt they will as we must keep up the Irish yank bashing side no matter what.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Simon Jester
    Favourite Simon Jester
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 10:00 PM

    No one heard of operation Able Archer??Nov 1983 Russia almost started ww3 because of their own paranoia.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute stephen lane
    Favourite stephen lane
    Report
    Dec 15th 2014, 12:03 AM

    I quite like the apocraphyl story that the first nuclear bomb was used during the Battle of Kursk 1943. The German bomb was smuggled in a captured Russian Truck to a staging point packed with soldiers, tanks, artillery & supplies. The bomb only partially exploded but still wreaked havoc. The Russians sent a message to Germany afterwards warning that they would use Gas & Bio warfare on German cities if there was a repeat. Apocryphal but intriguing.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Simon Jester
    Favourite Simon Jester
    Report
    Dec 15th 2014, 1:53 PM

    Bit late with that conspircy theory…The first “Nazi nuke” was supposedly used in Crimea in the attack on the Sevastopl fortresses.Seeing that these fortresses were built with ten to twelve foot concrete walls and that it took the Germans a few days with ultra heavy mortars like “Thor” and the largest railway gun ever built called “schwerer Gustav”[Heavy Gustav] to reduce these to utter ruins,there has always been a claim that the shells fired at them were nukes. Doubt Adolf and Co would have cared if the Sovs had used NBC warfare in retaliation,after all by that time most German cities were ruined anyway and in the “total war” declaration Hitler wanted absolutely nothing left of value in Germany if they were conqured.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gary
    Favourite Gary
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 8:08 PM

    “The resulting centrifugal forces”? There is no such thing as a centrifugal force.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Avina Laaf
    Favourite Avina Laaf
    Report
    Dec 14th 2014, 10:07 PM

    Yes there is.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Darren Bates
    Favourite Darren Bates
    Report
    Dec 15th 2014, 11:29 AM

    Gary’s actually right. There’s a centripetal force; I’m pretty sure that’s what people mean when they say centrifugal.

    1
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Avina Laaf
    Favourite Avina Laaf
    Report
    Dec 15th 2014, 12:17 PM

    Centripetal force and centrifugal force are related, but different.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Avina Laaf
    Favourite Avina Laaf
    Report
    Dec 15th 2014, 12:30 PM

    Although Gary is correct in that centrifugal force is not a real force in the true sense of the word, but comes from the inertia of a moving body.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds