Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
MORE THAN ONE day after it disappeared en route from east Java in Indonesia to Singapore, mystery surrounds the fate of AirAsia flight QZ8501 and the 162 people on board.
No debris from the Airbus A320-200 has so far been recovered, and Indonesia’s National Search and Rescue Agency chief Bambang Soelistyo said today that “the hypothesis is the plane is at the bottom of the sea”.
Following are some questions surrounding the disappearance and search.
What impact could bad weather have played on the plane’s fate?
Air traffic controllers lost contact with the twin-engine aircraft around an hour after it left Juanda International airport at Surabaya in East Java at 5:35 am Sunday (10.35pm GMT on Saturday).
Shortly before disappearing, AirAsia said the plane had asked permission from Jakarta air traffic control to deviate from its flight plan and climb above bad weather in an area noted for severe thunderstorms.
Gerry Soejatman, a consultant with the Jakarta-based Whitesky Aviation chartered flight provider, said the verdict is still out on whether bad weather conditions was the “primary factor or just a contributory factor” in the disappearance.
He told AFP:
Based on the public information we have, the pilots turned to the left of its designated route, and also requested to climb to a higher altitude.
Approval was given for the left turn but there are indications the plane climbed without approval. If that is the case, the turbulence could have been severe and the pilots made a decision to save the aircraft rather than wait for approval.
Anthony Brickhouse, a member of the International Society of Air Safety Investigators, said it “is not atypical to have a pre-programmed flight path and then something happens and the pilots try to adjust it”.
“Airliners in general tend to avoid thunderstorms as much as possible to give passengers a smoother ride,” Brickhouse, an assistant professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, told AFP.
Right now, the fact that they were trying to avoid bad weather doesn’t tell us a lot in the grand scheme of things.
Was Flight QZ8501 flying too slowly when it disappeared?
Some experts have said initial readings of radar data have shown the plane was flying much slower than it should have been when it disappeared.
In the Air France Flight AF447 crash in 2009, it is believed a build-up of ice on “pitot tube” instruments caused the pilots to receive distorted data on airspeed before the aircraft went down.
“Although any attempt to explain the reason for the disappearance of the AirAsia flight is pure speculation at this time, we can’t but notice at least one apparent similarity with another famous crash: Air France 447,” wrote aviation blogger David Cenciotti on theaviationist.com.
He added that low ground speed could have been caused by strong headwinds.
Soejatman said early readings from a leaked air traffic control image circulating online showed Flight QZ8501 was “extremely slow”.
“If the plane happened to be going below stall speed, then well, you will fall out of the sky,” he said.
Can we rule out terrorism or a hijack attempt?
Experts say it is too early to rule out any possibility – but that there is no evidence that this is the case.
“As an investigator, I am trained to keep all possibilities on the table until evidence suggest otherwise,” said Brickhouse. “Right now, I have not seen anything that could be associated with any kind of criminal act.”
Why have authorities not picked up signals?
Aircraft have an Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT), which is designed mainly for when the plane crashes on land and pilots are still trying to control it. In the event of a major crash, it may not work.
The plane also has a “black box” consisting of the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder. If immersed in water they should activate a “pinger” that can draw investigators to the location. However, the sound cannot be heard over long distances.
Soejatman said AirAsia “does not subscribe” to ACARS (Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System) — which sends short messages to ground controllers — even though the Airbus A320-200 is equipped with the system.
He said authorities must move quickly to improve technology that help locate aircraft when they go missing.
“Even with MH370 the beacon did not go off. Why aren’t we getting the beacon in large-scale incidents?” he said.
I am not saying it is a faulty system. The beacon (ELT) is the best thing we have at the moment. But we have to work on improving it.
Brickhouse said “advanced tracking technology is out there” but “financial and logistics ramifications come into play in terms of installing them”.
What are the difficulties faced by search teams?
National Search and Rescue Agency chief Bambang Soelistyo said today search teams are scouring an area where the sea is 40-50 metres (130-160 feet) deep.
He said Indonesia was coordinating with other countries to access any equipment that may be needed to scour the seabed.
Soejatman said despite the shallow water in the search area, “mud and hard rocks” could interfere with sonar pings emitted by the plane’s ELT.
Have there been other plane mysteries like this?
Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 disappeared while flying from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing on March 8 with 239 passengers and crew.
The Boeing 777-200 aircraft is believed to have crashed in the Indian Ocean far off Australia’s west coast after diverting off course for an unknown reason and flying for several more hours over the remote waters.
An intense air and sea search failed to find any wreckage from the aircraft, while an underwater search has been underway for weeks with no result.
Air France Flight 447 crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in June 2009 while on a flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris, killing 216 passengers and 12 crew. Debris was not found for days and it took years to locate the wreckage. Investigators eventually concluded that both technical and human error were to blame.
Adam Air Flight 574 with 102 people on board disappeared from radar in January 2007, also at its cruise phase during a domestic flight in Indonesia. Debris was found nine days later after an extensive search and it took months to recover the plane’s black box.
Indonesian authorities said the pilots lost control after becoming preoccupied with malfunctioning navigational equipment.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
It’s all because the pilots were trained using the metric system.
At least that’s what one idiot on fox news thinks.
Fox doesn’t do news it does fiction.
Their opinion poll graphics are the best, they always add up to more than 100%
Boganity.. Polls have a margin of error built in.. Usually up to + or – 5%.. So the total does not always equal 100.
Margin for error means the figures may be slightly understated for one outcome and over stated for another but the totals are never greater than 100%. However we’re talking about Fox News here, and these are their actual published outcomes presented in pie-charts of two recent polls where people where asked their opinions on an issue: agree 59% disagree 35% don’t know 26%, that’s a total of 120% and on voting intentions: 60% for Candidate A, 63% for Candidate B, 70% for Candidate C, that’s a total of 193%. I doubt whether the people who watch Fox would have been able to work out those totals in their heads.
It just shows again, that there are still major improvements to be made to equip planes with emergency technology, flying will never be 100% safe, and you’re statistically still more likely to be killed while travelling to and from the airport, unfortunately the statistics won’t help those poor people on board that plane.
I just hope they will quickly find out what happened and then take the appropriate steps to prevent it from happening again.
My deepest sympathies for the families and friends of those lost in the plane.
Dead right, but as AF447 showed there are major issues with pilot training – when the instruments don’t give them reliable data, the pilots had no idea what to do.
Time to make ACARS mandatory for all airlines if their planes are equipped with it
@Alan. When they say that Air Asia ‘didn’t subscribe’ to it, does it mean they wouldn’t pay for the service or that they didn’t believe it offered an advantage to the running of the airline?
Changing altitude or course without permission in Indonesian airspace is quite common as it can take repeated requests to ATC, and up to 30 minutes for them to respond. In that time frame a crew has no choice if it means over shooting their destination or worse, ending up inside a a super cell thunder storm.
Flyin tomorow do not want to hear this
Don’t mean the article obviously just thoughts of what can happen
You’ve got a better chance of winning the top prize in the lottery several weeks in a row
Don’t mean to be blasé, but that doesn’t console the families (or victims) of all-too-common air disasters.
The odds against anyone connected with this disaster reading the comments in Journal.ie are pretty solid too.
a point to consider Malaysia would not sign up to the ttp. now all these events are happening heaping great pressure on them economically and internationally.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/bush-cheney-face-torture-and-war-crimes-charges-mock-trial
they also pushed for bush and others to be charged by the united nations.
have your say