Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
FIVE YEARS SINCE a 7.0 magnitude earthquake struck Haiti’s capital Port-au-Prince, the country’s reconstruction has seen much progress, but so much more remains to be done.
On January 12, 2010 a devastating earthquake killed over 220,000 people, injured more than 300,000, and 1.5 million lost their homes. It also destroyed vital infrastructure, including government and commercial buildings, hospitals, schools and roads.
Haiti is the poorest country in the western hemisphere. Before the earthquake, the situation was difficult, but we had started to see growth. The earthquake set us back more than 20 years.
Painstakingly rebuilding a shattered country
Many schools, hospitals, government buildings, roads and other infrastructure have been rebuilt. A new education strategy has resulted in more children going to school, though Haiti still has one of the world’s lowest enrolment rates.
The country’s burgeoning private sector has seen increased investment. Irish-owned telecomm company Digicel, is one of the international companies that have invested in the private sector, and are also supporting development projects. Haitians who used to live overseas are returning and are investing in the country, which is a good sign.
Tourism has evolved a lot in Haiti. Visitor numbers have increased from less than 1,000 a year pre-earthquake, to over 2,000 in the last five years and it is growing.
More hotels have been built in the past few years and many I would encourage people to come and visit Haiti. It is a beautiful island and a boost in tourism would fuel our development. Investment in sectors like tourism, business, renewable energy, natural resources and agribusiness will also create more jobs and tax revenue for Haiti.
The majority of Haitians are still trapped in desperate poverty
Although much has been achieved, the international community must not become complacent about the pace of progress or the outstanding needs.
The fact is many Haitians continue to live in a desperate situation. The majority are trapped in poverty, with little access to basic services. More than 85,000 are still displaced, living in temporary camps. The country needs investment to build around 30,000 new houses a year for the next decade in order to deal with the housing problem.
Local Christian Aid partners have built more than 550 earthquake-resistant houses to date, mainly in the rural areas, in line with the Haitian government’s reconstruction strategy. Our work is not simply about providing decent houses. Our partners have helped over 32,000 people earn a living by proving seeds, tools, and livestock for farmers, as well as loans and business training to traders. As a result they are able to earn a living in the countryside, do not feel compelled to move back to the capital, Port-au-Prince.
There are still many barriers to long-term development, including past and present political instability, environmental degradation, vulnerability to natural disasters and weak governance. At a time when many institutional donors and NGOs have reduced their funding for Haiti’s development, the country urgently needs more investment in health, education, agriculture, environment, infrastructure, security and tourism.
Haitian involvement vital to success of rebuilding – and avoiding the ‘mining resource curse’
The devastation from the earthquake prompted a generous global response in aid and donations by governments and private citizens. This aid continues to play a significant part in the reconstruction and development of Haiti.
However, a lack of trust in the ability of the Haitian people and institutions to rebuild their country is limiting the effectiveness of development. The international institutions need to work towards building local capacity so Haitians are more involved in determining the priorities and objectives, and in implementing reconstruction and development projects.
Over the last five years a few mining companies have undertaken exploration in the hills north of Haiti where it has been claimed exists an estimated $20 billion worth in gold, copper and silver. There are increasing concerns that, while the mining sector has potential wealth for Haiti, the risk of the costs to local communities, of opening this sector to investment, may outweigh the benefits.
For instance, the mining sector is still operating under an obsolete 1976 mining law. In addition, the lack of transparency and clear procedures in the awarding the exploration rights and contracts has turned people’s concerns to anger. If the right procedures and relevant laws are not in place to regulate this sector, Haiti could suffer the resource curse as has happened in other mineral rich developing countries around the world.
Haitians have made remarkable strides since January 2010. While I am optimistic about our future, this fifth anniversary comes at a time of political unrest. Recent weeks have seen public demonstrations over the failure of the administration to hold long-anticipated elections.
The situation is tense. I hope our leaders will resolve the political crisis and find the best solution for the Haitian people. Otherwise, this situation could undo all the good work that has been achieved over the last five years.
It has been a challenging five years. While Haiti will continue to need foreign assistance for another 15-20 years, we want to work towards a point where the country is not reliant on overseas aid. This is possible.
Prospery Raymond is the Christian Aid Country Manager for Haiti and the Dominican Republic.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
We have known about this patent cliff for years, yet we have supported generic products who do not engage in R&D. The downside of that is that large Pharma companies are not investing in NPD because of falling revenues and we have no new drugs to take over. We have done nothing to encourage R&D and we are going to pay a heavy price unfortunately.
The pharma companies are not sleep walking into this and have been living with this kind of thing as part of their normal business risks for years.
The good ones will be bringing replacement product on stream and selling the patent rump to generic manufacturers as they free up capacity for new product.
It is a well trodden path
“with the country’s pharmaceutical industry currently generating 50 per cent of the total amount of the nation’s exports”
Merchandise exports, not total exports. Ireland is ahead of the curve internationally in switching to services exports (software, consultancy, financial services, etc) and they now constitute 50% of all exports, so pharma is – after some simple multiplication – about a quarter of total exports.
This is a relatively serious issue, not because it is unexpected or even because of the effect it will have on our export statistics, but because of the effect it will have on (a) corporate tax revenues, and (b) FDI decisions by pharma firms in relation to existing and new plants.
Don’t forget that there is also a generic pharmaceutical industry in Ireland that provide people with affordable medicines. Some of those people could not afford the medicines when it is not generic!
When I was in college I did my work placement with Eli Lilly and it was an amazing place to work. They really look after their staff; the (very subsidised) canteen was award winning and as good as any restaurant. They threw a big party for everyone’s kids at Christmas and gave them Easter eggs as well. They really do everything they can to provide a safe working environment; with schemes such as flexi time (where possible) and of course employees are well paid.
These are exactly the kind of employers we should be supporting/keeping in this country.
@Patrick The Cipramil/Lexapro, Losec/Nexium, Clarityn/NeoClarityn trick has been closed by European regulators.
Overall, this is not a huge issue as Pfizer bought Wyeth recently, as the latter have a better “pipeline” of new drugs coming to the market. Pfizer would have negotiated the price for Lipitor which allowed them to cover the costs of developing it. If they had spent the money on developing new products rather than on marketting, they might not be in the position they are now.
Anyway, can we see real figures of what is contributed to people and the economy, rather than the not very informative figures of what value was exported?
So do you not just alter the drug ingredients slightly, give it a new brand name, work the marketing magic and take out a patent on the new brand and you’re away again ?? Example is Cipramil which is now called Lexapro because the patent ran out. So the manufacturer used a different binding agent in the drug, put it in a new box and off they went again with a “new” product and a new patent. I’m sure there might be a few sweeteners offered to doctors as well to prescribe the new named drug ! So for these reasons I don’t see the expiration of some patents being much of an issue really. It’s cheap labour in Asia that’s more of a worry where major manufacturers move their entire operations over to India or somewhere at a fraction of the cost.
No this is now not allowed. It used to be but unless it’s a completely new formulation the FDA and EMEA will not grant licenses.
When we talk about Pharma exports being a quarter of our total exports…
…how much of that is real exporting and how much of that is part of the double Irish tax dodge?
More of a question than a comment but can patents not be extended?
A normal patent gives you 20 years. You can apply for an extra 5 years in special circumstances i.e. drug companies. Assume that all this has been well researched by whoever owns the rights to Lipitor
You can. The makers of Prozac extended their patent by inventing a new disorder based on PMS. They then made the pills pink, whacked the price up 300% and called it “serafem”. They also marketed it to dogs as “reconcile”.
Check out the documentary “Big Pharma, Big Bucks”, it explains it all :)
Here is another question, how much does the hse spend on these companies products each year?
a good few of the companies are/will merge with other larger companies so it is a concern that the patents are coming on stream but the industry is adaptable !
have your say