Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
A US GUN manufacturer is looking to disarm Liam Neeson’s career because of comments he made about there being “too many f***ing guns out there.”
Gun manufacturer Para says it regrets providing guns for use in Neeson’s recent film Taken 3, and said it will not be arming future films starring the Antrim actor.
In the Taken franchise, Neeson plays an ex-CIA operative who regularly shoots his enemies, but in an interview with Gulf News he said he doesn’t think such movies are the reason for gun violence.
“There’s too many f***ing guns out there,” he said.
Especially in America. I think the population is like, 320 million? There’s over 300 million guns. Privately owned, in America. I think it’s a f***ing disgrace. Every week now we’re picking up a newspaper and seeing, ‘Yet another few kids have been killed in schools’.
Para wasn’t happy with the comments from the Taken star, saying his views reflect “a cultural and factual ignorance that undermines support of the Second Amendment and American liberties”.
Not only has Para pledged never to supply weapons for a Liam Neeson film in the future, but they’re also encouraging their “friends and partners” in Hollywood to join in the boycott.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Para better hide because he will find you and you know the rest
He’s got certain skills alright
Liam should take it as a compliment. He is right
5 year old boy shots his 9 month old brother in the head, killing the child.Yeah Para is right, Neeson hasn’t a clue. (Sarcasm ).
Context, Norman. Context.
Too many fu***king Irish ignoramuses commenting on a subject they are clueless about.
Don’t talk about yourself like that Simon.
Simon . what part did he not have a clue about ??
Neeson was born in Ballymena Co. Antrim in 1952, he grew up during the so called troubles and saw first hand what firearms can do in the hands of the “culturally and factually educated”, if these fools want to debate this point with him, its their mistake.
You have a point, but I wouldn’t call The Troubles “so-called”. It was called the Troubles for a reason.
Too many stars in your self censorship
“Factual ignorance”?
An example would help, lads
No one has ever died because America has too many guns and if you disagree you’re a communist.
Stupid, inaccurate statement and I’m not a communist
Its neither stupid nor inaccurate. Funnily enough in countries where there are strict gun laws and where guns aren’t readily available people don’t just walk into schools and open fire on each other. When guns are as freely available as they are in the US anyone can gain access to them including Teenagers, kids and people with mental illness. In certain states it is easier to get a gun than it is to vote. It’s a pretty warped sense of logic when you can legally purchase a firearm at the age of 18 but are breaking the law by buying a beer at the same age.
I will find you. And para better beware.
Are you kidding? Tell that to the parents of the kids killed at Sandy Hook school. Your comment is very stupid.
The stats for America vs the world are here. http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/jul/22/gun-homicides-ownership-world-list
Now tell me that no one in America has died from having too many guns. I think you were living under a rock all this time
I’d imagine the Troubles up North would have been made infinitely worse had every person been legally armed to the teeth. Clearly it’s Para who are culturally ignorant.
‘Murica
I think Liam Neeson’s career will do just fine.
Ha! Factual ignorance, good one!
Para just shot the freedom of speech
… That would be the American solution to the problem aright. He just hi-lighted a huge obvious social problem that seems to be brushed under the carpet every time something happens.
Your forgetting about the $$$$$$
Ye he highlighted the problem all while he glorifies violence and gun culture, and makes a pretty penny off the back off it. He’s a hypocrite.
You do realise it’s a film and not real . Right ! Lol
@Cian Doherty – if we extend your logic, if an actor plays the role of a psycho in a film, but is actually a peace loving individual in real life and doesn’t in fact condone psycho shit, he is by your definition a hypocrite?
Plot for next movie: an unarmed Liam Neeson is attacked while on holiday in Connemara by 1000 terrorists all armed to the teeth with Para-brand weapons! Needless to say he kills them all with his bare hands, but there’s a lot of collateral damage – mostly farmers and sheep. Enraged, Liam rings the Para CEO and tells him he’s coming for him. You can guess the rest…
I’d go see that! Lol!
Anybody who effects or profit margin is an ignorant person.
I love America. Its one of the single most unequal societies in the West and has huge social problems that no one knows how to fix. But they can live with class warfare as long as you don’t talk about their gun rights. But then again we are all lefty loons over here…their words not mine.
In the recent coverage about Martin Luther King, I read an article that shows that while many Americans love and respect him, most media coverage cherry pick from his speeches and never show his speeches and writings from the last two or years of his life. In those couple of years his focus on injustice widened, and he began to talk about social injustice and social inequality across all races, not just blacks. It was basically what many would describe as a socialist message, but this part of his legacy continues to be ignored. There are areas in America, that if they were in Africa, Concern would be there.
See you have the wealthier dictating that they want to pay less tax to a society that is really good to them. The result is a society where only the richest can receive the best healthcare, education and other services.
Must look up that about Martin Luther King sounds very interesting indeed!
Here’s the link Spiderman. It’s an interesting article.
http://fair.org/slider/the-martin-luther-king-you-dont-see-on-tv/
“a cultural and factual ignorance”, the hypocrisy of such statement coming from one of the most close minded, ignorant right wing societies in the world.
Pretty sure that’s one of the best hash tags you’ve ever done guys.
‘Particular set of buzzkills’
Love it!
Of course para would say that it’s their livelihood being dissed!! Maybe if they were more stringent on who they gave guns to the comment wouldn’t need to be made! There are far too many guns out there … !
The number of guns isn’t the problem. The problem is that in many US states acquiring a gun licence requires no training in how to safely store, transport and use firearms. It’s perfectly fine to have a large number of guns (a la Canada or Switzerland) so long as regular training and medical or psychological checks are in place.
I can see “taken 4″ on the way!
Taken 4….Liam Neeson gets a Takeaway… One battered sausage can overcome.
Whatever about the ‘Second Amendment and American Liberties’; what about the First Amendment which is ‘Freedom of Speech’. Surely this is just as important. Are people not allowed to voice their opinion on a subject which is proven factual. What are the gun companies afraid of? Less sales of their products because some actor highlights an important issue? If anything, is the use of their guns in these films, not an advertisement for their product? Not condoning it, just making a point. Seems like to me it is fine from the gun companies point of view to advertise it through a film, just as long as you don’t come out saying ‘guns are a real problem in society’. The second amendment was written a long time ago and needs to be ‘amended’ to the present day. Stop hiding behind an archaic law and shouting ‘It’s our right to bear arms’. Its to easy to say that.
Just as Liam Neeson is free to voice his disapproval of the Second Amendment, PARA are free to voice their disapproval of his public statements and refuse his custom in the future.
As for advertisement, firms like PARA don’t manufacture their own distinctive firearms so the advertisement value is minimal. They actually get more free advertisement by announcing they’re never dealing with Neeson than they would hope to see by dealing with him.
“Comments made by its Irish-born star…” I.e. he’s not American therefore his opinion doesn’t matter!
America! F**K YEAH!!!!
Yours patriotically,
A Bald Eagle
Maybe Liam could write the baddies a strongly worded letter next time a member of his family is abducted.
Hey Kirk, it was a movie ok, now back to sleep, ssh ssssh!
It does tend to glorify violence and guns does it not?
Not really. Not one person I know has felt the urge to chase people around a city shooting guns after watching any Liam Neeson movie. Knowing the difference between a movie and real life is as important as knowing the difference between an eighteenth century definition of “bearing arms” with carrying a personal arsenal around in your pocket to threaten others.
So are you saying no one has ever been influenced by a movie?
Oh no, one of over ten thousand gun companies will no longer supply props for Liams movies. I guess he will be stuck with having to use guns from Beretta, Colt, Sig Saur, H&K, Glock, and all the other companies which people have actually heard of and not some small unknown of company that no one really cares about anyway.
Para Ordinance (full title)is btw a Canadian company not American.Thing is once a small cpmpany sets a trend over in Hollyweird in arms in the films.The big boys follow.
Cant wait for The Grey 2.Neeson sits down and has a good chat with the wolf pack to discuss their inner child issues.
Film producers tend to try and avoid the big names wherever possible because their firearms are highly recognisable and, thus, more expensive. Companies like PARA manufacture guns (in this case, the Browning 1911) which are past their patent protection date so any gun manufacturer can make versions of them with the right tools.
The fact is the US is too swamped with guns now to reel them in. Citizens need guns to protect themselves from armed criminals and the worst case scenario of an overbearing government turning the militarised police force against its own people.
In an ideal world there would be no guns but if I was an American I would not be handing over my firearms any time soon.
“It’s my gun….. and I’m going home”
Para sucks
We should all send a petition to Obama. I mean why can’t US be like Ireland with no guns on the streets, no shootings, punishment shootings (now there’s one they are short on in the US) armed robberies, car hijackings and ‘mistaken identity’ killings and of course the ever popular gangland killings?
Yeah Tom .With the strictest gun laws in the EU for legal gun ownership with the lowest numbers of gun ownership ad well.We should be a poster boy for the anti gun brigade…But we have a rising illegal gun crime problem where it is easier to get an illegal gun in Dublin than a legal one .
But that shouldnt happen!!!!Maybe more strict gun laws will stop the criminals this time!
Good move by Para.Wayyy too many anti gun fiction factory actors and actresses who have no problem using and glorifying the nasty things to make millions for themselves and live with armed protectiom in their mansions in Beverly Hills.But then have the audacity to go blame an inanimate object for the violence they acted out on screen becomes reality. Well done Liam ..Go collect your anti gun hyprocrite Hollywood actor membership on the way out..
there is a world of difference between the fantasy of carrying an onscreen guns in a fictional story and people who actually have and use guns. TV is fantasy! I watched Trainspotting, still haven’t become a drug addict.
he’s right you know
So much butthurt.
There’d no more gun crime in the US if everyone held a loaded gun pointed at everyone else.
Until the first trigger is pulled and all hell breaks loose.
That’s a bit below para…
Never heard of Para until now. Publicity Stunt.
In 1982, Kennesaw, Georgia passed a law requiring heads of households to keep at least one firearm in the house. The residential burglary rate subsequently dropped 89% in Kennesaw, compared to just 10.4% drop in Georgia as a whole.18
Today, the violent crime rate in Kennesaw is still 85% lower than Georgia’s or the national average
The Second Amendment says they have the right to bear arms, fair enough..maybe a bolt action rifle or a Shotgun but these guys making fully automatic machine guns that are so easy to fire that a child could use them is just taking the piss.. what person needs this type of firearm in their home? At least a bolt action rifle or shotgun can be used for hunting purposes but these type of rapid fire, high powered weapons should only be made available to people who really need to use them i.e army soldiers
Anthony, the Second Amendment was to insure that the American citizen could form a militia to fight the English or future dictator. So an “Assault” rifle is not unreasonable to fight in modern warfare like smart bombs or attack drones. Do I think people need fully auto rifles? No I don’t. In the US you need a Federal license to have that and it’s impossible to get.
It was not about hunting, in 1776 if you didn’t hunt you didn’t eat.
Go to Para USA Facebook page.
“I stand with Liam Neeson.”
I don’t get it I read about shootings everyday in Ireland. I thought hand guns are illegal in Ireland.
What planet are you living on? We don’t have a gun crime rate like America, Guns here are illegal and the police force on both sides have been cracking down on firearms. it’s nearly impossible to get a gun here
Every time I click my fingers, Liam Neesons film character offs another baddie.
Coming Summer 2016! Liam feels un appreciated after fans boycott his movie. Liam Neeson stars in TAKEN 4….GRANTED
Paranoia!
Always nice to follow the Yanks ranting about their amendments. Let them be and ignore them. Neeson is American and has every right to challenge the issue, this is such typical American behaviour that will see them looking over their shoulder more and more.
have your say