Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Note: A version of this article was originally published on 28 February. It’s being reposted this morning, in light of this afternoon’s planned ‘Right2Water’ rally.
BELIEVE IT OR not – it’s just over a year-and-a-half since the TheJournal.ie was publishing articles with headlines like ‘Why don’t the Irish protest more?‘.
Since then, of course, we’ve seen a significant protest movement build-up against the imposition of water charges.
The turn-out for the first mass Right2Water protest in Dublin City Centre surprised many. In the months since then, we’ve had a series of well-attended demos on the same subject.
And despite predictions that numbers would fall back after the Government’s climb-down on water charges in November of last year – turn-out for the last Right2Water rally, back in March, showed there were still significant numbers willing to turn-out to protest.
Another major demo is planned for this afternoon, on Dublin’s O’Connell Street. Again, organisers have said they’re expecting tens of thousands of people to turn out.
So how did we get here? What have been the defining events?
We take a look back at some of the key moments in the campaign against water charges since the start of last year – examining what kicked-off the movement, and how it developed…
The water issue had been (if you’ll pardon the expression) bubbling-under ever since the Government came to office.
However, the waste-water really hit the fan at the start of 2014 after CEO of the utility John Tierney said on RTÉ radio that €50 million of its set-up costs had been spent on consultants.
It emerged at an Oireachtas committee meeting the following week that, in fact, just under €86 million was slated to be spent on consultants, contractors and legal advice as part of an overall budget of up to €180 million to establish Irish Water.
Fianna Fáil’s Barry Cowen said Environment Minister Phil Hogan had either “deliberately lied” or accidentally given “a gross underestimation” to the Dáil about Irish Water costs.
Months of uncertainty over charges followed – with Labour attempting to put clear distance between themselves and Fine Gael on the issue in the run-up to May’s local and European elections.
The Government was accused of treating the public “with absolute contempt” as the Taoiseach told the Dáíl that nothing had been “signed off on” after yet another Cabinet meeting on the issue.
Eventually, on 6 May, Phil Hogan announced in a press conference that the average household would pay €240 per year – and said that those who didn’t pay would be faced with reduced water pressure.
People with disabilities, carers and the elderly would receive an allowance of €100 a year, he said – but details had yet to be finalised.
Against that political backdrop, stories from anti-metering protests – in Dublin and Cork, in particular – began to appear in the news media more frequently.
Gardaí attended an action at an estate in Togher in April after locals refused to allow contractors to install meters in the pavement – and we began to see scenes like this develop for the first time…
From the same week, in the capital – protests organised by ‘Dublin Says No’ and other groups were staged, targeting meter installations in Raheny, Kilbarrack, Edenmore, and surrounding areas.
Tánaiste Eamon Gilmore said he couldn’t understand why people were protesting the metering process “because in fact the water meters are being installed to enable households to reduce what they will have to pay”.
On the political front – the local elections came and went, with Labour being dealt a drubbing.
Meanwhile, Trim resident Tony Rochford – who staged a hunger strike outside the Dáíl the previous year – became the first person to be arrested for blocking meter installation.
Rochford had parked his blue Isuzu jeep across a road in the Steeple Manor estate. Protesters on the street had earlier been warned they would be arrested if they didn’t allow workers access.
There was an upsurge in the number of protests against meter installations throughout last summer – both in Dublin and elsewhere.
Hundreds of social media groups began to spring up – with activists organising local meetings, and arranging to block off access to streets, as workers arrived.
At an event in Raheny, one man was arrested after protesters confronted the Taoiseach at the opening of a specialist hospital.
In what would be the first of several angry demonstrations protesting the presence of a senior politician, around 20 people shouted ‘traitor’ as scuffles broke-out around Enda Kenny’s car.
Irish Water, it seemed, couldn’t go a week in 2014 without some sort of controversy cropping up.
The fact that the semi-state planned to asking for PPS numbers had many householders worried last summer.
It was essential, in order to ensure people receive the allowances they are entitled to, the utility’s head of communications insisted.
Independent Catherine Murphy raised the issue in the Dáil as TDs returned after their break, telling the Taoiseach people had “huge concerns about handing over PPS numbers to what is in effect a private company”.
Around the same time, Irish Water had to apologise after sending more than 6,000 letters with incorrect names to customers.
As public opposition to charges in general (and, after their disastrous year, Irish Water in particular) grew throughout the summer – left-wing groups began to get organised, forming the umbrella group ‘Right2Water’.
Their first national ‘day of action‘ in October confounded the expectations of many.
Organisers had initially estimated that around 10,000 people would show up, but figures late on the day put the turnout at at least eight times that.
The same day, former Socialist MEP Paul Murphy – who had run a focused anti-water charges campaign – claimed victory in the Dublin South West by-election, taking Brian Hayes’ old seat.
The Budget was just days away, but it was clear that – unless the Government did something drastic – water was going to dominate the agenda for months to come.
Local protests continued throughout October, with the Government’s budget announcement that most people would be entitled to €100 tax relief on their bills appearing to have little or no effect on the national mood.
Amidst the continuing drip-drip of revelations and controversies, nothing encapsulated the communications difficulties at the beleaguered semi-state more than the confusion over whether tenants or landlords would be liable for the charges.
The company said that tenants would have to pay, but in the event of them not registering with Irish Water the landlord would be contacted (more legislation is planned on the issue this year).
Meanwhile, veteran Fianna Fáil TD Willie O’Dea said he would be refusing to hand over his PPS number to Irish Water, saying they had given “no reasonable explanation” why he should.
Around 100,000 people turned out for the second mass ‘day of action’ against water charges on 1 November.
Speaking that evening, Enda Kenny defended the charges – saying they had been put in place “as an alternative to increasing income tax”.
The issue continued to dominate the political agenda, and within days Tánaiste Joan Burton was telling reporters that she imagined a family of four would likely face an Irish Water bill of less than €200.
A spokesperson for the Labour leader later said that she was expressing her own view and that work on the exact figures remained “ongoing”.
As she attended an event at a college of further education in the south-west Dublin suburb of Jobstown, the Tánaiste’s car was surrounded for hours by a group of angry protesters, who banged on her vehicle and chanted ‘peaceful protest’.
TD Paul Murphy took part in the demonstration – and a tense stand-off developed over the Saturday afternoon, as more and more gardaí were sent to the scene, including the Public Order Unit.
Burton was eventually escorted away – and two people were arrested that evening.
The incident sparked a long debate over the tenor of the continuing demonstrations. Events attended by the Taoiseach were also met with protests, and Alan Kelly said his constituency office had dealt with a bomb threat.
After numerous leaks, the Government finally confirmed its revised charging structure to the Dáil on 19 November.
The charges were reduced considerably, with two flat rates introduced – to be in place until the end of 2018.
The Dáil voted to back it the following day.
Soon, however, Government TDs were back to shooting themselves in the feet. Fine Gael’s Noel Coonan came in for major criticism after he warned that Ireland faces “an ISIS situation” if the more extreme elements of water charge protests are not “nipped in the bud”.
More and more international media outlets began running stories on the protest movement in the wake of a third Right2Water protest, outside Government Buildings, on December 10th.
Channel 4 News reported the Garda estimate of 30,000 protesters, quoted Gerry Adams and Paul Murphy, and emphasised that the charges were seen as “double taxation” by opponents.
Attendance was down on the previous mass actions – although turn-out was still impressive for a weekday afternoon.
The protest was marred by some sporadic violence – a garda sustained facial injuries outside the Dáil, and officers clashed with demonstrators on O’Connell Bridge as they attempted to reopen the thoroughfare to traffic, following a break-away protest.
After a quiet few weeks at the start of the year, the meter protests were back in the headlines at the end of January after footage emerged in which a water protester could be heard calling President Michael D Higgins a ‘midget parasite’.
It later emerged that the protester in question was one of the main campaigners behind the ‘Dublin Says No’ group, Derek Byrne.
Byrne later apologised for using the word ‘midget’.
Despite speculation that the controversy might put some people off attending a rally organised by DSN and other grassroots groups the following Saturday – the Dublin action (which wasn’t organised by Right2Water) still attracted a large turn-out.
Other rallies around the country were also well attended - showing there were still huge numbers of people willing to turn out to voice their opposition to water charges.
The arrests of more than 20 people - including Murphy – by gardaí investigating the false imprisonment of Joan Burton, meant the issue of water protests stayed in the headlines again, for days.
Locals activists claimed the gardaí were “terrorising” the community and questioned why groups of up to ten officers were turning up to make the early-morning arrests.
Responding to accusations of political policing, Enda Kenny insisted investigations were purely a matter for gardaí.
And – regarding his own security arrangements – he said that he didn’t feel extra protection was needed, despite gardaí being “more than anxious” to provide it.
It was reported two weeks ago that charges were about to brought in relation to the south-west Dublin protest – but so far, none have materialised.
Alongside the Jobstown arrests, the jailing of four water protesters – including DSN’s Byrne – for breaking a court injuction, provided a new focal point for some anti-charges campaigners.
It followed the latest in a string of court hearings on the matter.
The protesters had been told to stay at least 20 metres away from GMC Sierra workers tasked with installing the meters – but evidence showed they had broken the terms of that order.
The protesters were sentenced to between 28 and 56 days in prison – however they were all freed early, after a surprise ruling from President of the High Court Nicholas Kearns, who found there were a number of errors in the warrant of committal, ordering their detention.
Weekly rallies took place, each Saturday afternoon, while the protesters were in prison.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
The FFG way working hard for the 1%
@Kevin O Brien: It will be interesting to see to see what SF/IRA will bring to the table if they are in government after the next elections. A border poll would be a safe bet to divert attention from their mismanagement of the economy.
@Vincent Alexander: They should shelf all talk and activity on united Ireland until after the get control of the current FF/FG managed crises. They need to focus on undoing the damage before it’s too late.
@Vincent Alexander: what a Muppet…having a go at a party not yet in power instead of having a go at the current clowns in government…you Sir are next level ignorant!
@David Corrigan: Speaking to SF people on the ground, they are worried about the whole immigration issue & comments by senior SF people on the issue & also what would happen if they fail on the main issues like Fine Gael & Fianna Fail. The silent majority are bubbling with anger at the moment, things will need to change fast. FFG concentrated on side issues & neglected the real issues.
@damien leen: SF’s track record in the North or any council where they hold the balance of power is enough to predict what they will be like in government. Instead of looking to fly the Palestinian flag over Dublin council buildings they will look to fly it over Leinster House.
I work in a retail shop near Moore street. Roma gypsies shop frequently in this shop. The only way I see them pay is via vouchers, which they gouge from charities like this by gaming the system with their 5+ kids each pretending to be poor. The vinnos pay out in these vouchers. Our welfare game and charities are being played by these chancers and we’re losing. They’re entitled to the full suite of welfare benefits because they’re EU citizens (usually Romanian or Hungarian, yes I know Roma is separate from Romanian before anybody tries to say I think otherwise)
@Sean Murphy: And Romanians would bring you to task if you called them Roma.
@Sean Murphy: To be honest the ‘normal’ Romanians and other Eastern Europeans are high on the list of people complaining about the bad reputation they are giving them. They think the Irish are mad for putting up with them !!
Thanks FFFG
I remember reading a comment about St Vincent de Paul on the journal in the last couple of months. A man who worked with them commented that when he went and did house visits, some of the houses that he went to had the best televisions on the walls, every child having a tablet and the best lashes and lips on show.
Your level of income is not the problem if that’s the case it’s your budgeting skills you’re not prioritizing what’s important.
@Fiona Wyse: Are you Joan Burton?
She didn’t like ‘poor’ people owning mobile phones because they they uploaded videos of people protesting against water charges.
@Fiona Wyse: Link please.
@Frank Cauldhame: Eh no lol.
@Juri Hertel: it was a journal article on here about SDVP a couple of months ago, somebody working for them posted the comment.
Anything on what’s happening down in roscrea right now ??
@Andrew Martin: Any comment on the above article or does every article have to be turned into a discussion on IPAs?
@Michael Geaney: You might have noticed, comments are closed on the above article.
@Michael Geaney: are you new here!! The journal slap our hands if we want to comment on issues that affect us all so we comment where we can!
So wait, let me get this straight, our right wing government abdicating all responsibility for the poor, and instead funnelling tax money to private, unregulated charities, who have zero meaningful oversight, hasn’t solved poverty?
Wild.
This vast desperation should come as no surprise.
We have 75k homeless (source: Guardian) and sold 2/3rds of our social housing to private owners. We have 14x more homes on Airbnb than available for rent. We have some of the highest rents and highest food prices in the EU.
And guess what, the far right will show up here in droves and say the only solution is less government. Less taxes for the rich. And less regulation on property owners.
Ireland: cop on. Stop being so gullible.
@Chris O’Brien: are you saying St Vincent De Paul is unregulated if that’s what you’re saying I highly advise you do your homework. I’m with SVP I can tell you in my area we file accounts. Our funding comes from good people who donate to the charity and we distribute funds mostly shopping vouchers to people in need. Some charities may be unregulated but you’ll find most are regulated and audited
@Nemethon: how often does someone representing government visit you to make sure the accounts you file are accurate? What government agency audits you, supervises how you distribute your donations to make sure what you claim is accurate, etc.?
What you’ve said in no way refutes what I said, btw.
What laws govern your behaviour specifically, and how familiar are you with them personally? Who oversees you from government to ensure you behave within the explicit laws that govern you? Etc.
In fact you operate under VERY light touch regulation, compared to what you’d operate under if you were in a government agency.
So for example SVP is regulated by the Charities Regulation Act. It’s main requirement is an annual submission of financial records.
On the other hand government agencies are under much more – public – oversight
https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/committees/financial-scrutiny/
And SVP receives close to 1.5M a year in taxpayer money.
With essentially no regulation.
@Nemethon:
Also worth noting that SVP pays its head 110k a year and has 155M in reserves.
That’s someone earning far more than an average government employee warns, sitting on 2x the amount it donated to the homeless, etc.
And while an audit might show that all those numbers are accurate, what it doesn’t do is given voters an control. Even political control. You can’t vote out the head of SVP despite his salary being paid by taxpayers. You ain’t see him scrutinised in the Dail either.
Etc.
@Chris O’Brien: Our 2 billionaires received much more:
independent.ie/business/world/irelands-two-richest-billionaires-worth-more-than-bottom-half-of-earners/a505294402.html
@Chris O’Brien: Two love the Nazi’s “Less taxes for the rich” for sure:
independent.ie/business/world/irelands-two-richest-billionaires-worth-more-than-bottom-half-of-earners/a505294402.html
Probably half of them are the people the government let in
Ever wonder how a woman could feed a family of 8 people three meals a day back in the 70s when microwave ovens and ready meals didn’t exist and a shopping trolley was full of junk food.
@Jack Moss: That was half a century ago….
@Jack Moss: potatoes , porridge and boxty
@Jack Moss: Usually because the woman herself did not sit down to dine with her family, she ate the leftovers if there were any and lived on cups of tea.
@Jack Moss: wasn’t full of junk food .
@Jack Moss: Clearly not all of them could, there was net emigration from Ireland until the 1990s.
@Frank Cauldhame: It’s gas,when it doesn’t suit people narrative to make comparisons to 50 years ago they rubbish things but then they will say ‘In the 60/70’s we built loads of council houses,why can’t we do that again’
@uUleRhCu: Like those who crow about a war that ended decades ago when they try and criticise the opposition parties. People need to move on.
@David Corrigan: Again,people love to whitewash the past and say ‘move on’…when it suits them but then go on about 100 years of fffg.And we all know that that lot have not gone away.That also is only one small part of people’s problems with that lot….It’s more the damage they would do to the economy(and international relations)if they got in.Finally,for someone who doesn’t support that crowd,you do an awful lot of heavy lifting for them.
Billionaires have telephone numbers too.And addresses.
independent.ie/business/world/irelands-two-richest-billionaires-worth-more-than-bottom-half-of-earners/a505294402.html
“Back to school costs, third level costs, household goods, furniture, clothing, support with health related costs, issues with mortgages and rent or funeral expenses”
Average Journal commenter: the poor are so lazy.
@Chris O’Brien: dont forget those who insist were a wealthy country while blaming those on welfare for all our woes
I think it would be fairer and more liberal to live in North Korea.
When the economy next crashes (probably in 2035 AD) will the neoliberal Irish change their minds about the need for a Communist revolution?
I am willing to wait and find out.
The reason for this lies solely with government policy’s,Blaming the less well off it’s just what the government wants one to do. The sitting government has caused this divide between Have and Have nots. They are forcing more and more poor people into this country, they have forced up house prices by allowing vulture funds buy up large amounts of properties. The buck lies at the top and government are happy all day if we all blame each other…… this left / right dribble from the sitting government is just smoke and mirrors.
have your say