Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IN LESS THAN an hour, Apple will be announcing the final details surrounding its long-awaited product, the Apple Watch.
Tim Cook will be talking about the smartwatch (and other things as well like an iOS update) at 5pm Irish time and we will likely know about its price and its availability.
Here’s what we already know about it, and what questions need to be answered about it this evening.
It’s going to be (very) expensive
The price tag of from $349 (likely €349 here as Apple doesn’t adjust its prices for other products too much) that Cook revealed back in September would likely be for the cheapest model, the Apple Watch Sport, which uses rubber straps.
Rumours that the price of the luxury version, Apple Watch Edition, will go up as far as $8,000 have been mentioned as it will include scratch-resistant 18ct gold, but even if the price is this high, they will be produced in limited quantities.
Gestures will be consistent but versatile
The most important difference between Apple Watch and other product is Force Touch. Basically an alternative button press, the watch will be able to distinguish between a tap and your finger pressing on the screen (force touch).
Also, gestures across all apps will be consistent. Vertical swipes will scroll, horizontal swipes switches between pages and the digital crown will scroll through pages.
Also, there will be no keyboard. Instead, all of your interactions with it will be through preselected answers, voice replies, or drawing a response through digital touch.
It will be available in two sizes
To cater for all users, the watch will come in 28mm and 42mm sizes. There are no changes made to the specs, but it means that the device won’t look like massive on your wrist provided you choose the right size.
It’s going to prioritise fitness and health
Alongside the traditional heart-rate monitor, gyroscope and accelerometer, the device has a Tapic Engine which produces haptic feedback (read: it touches you or vibrates).
That’s mainly for notifications, but it can also be used for messaging heartbeats to someone, or it could tie into fitness routines more.
Imagine being tapped to remind you to get up from your desk to move about or going for a run and having taps to tell you when to speed up or slow down. That will likely tie into activity, but there may be more uses for this feature coming up tonight.
Exactly how long does a single charge last?
During the September event, Cook mentioned how the watch will be charged but didn’t go into how long the charge will last. Now fast forward six months later and the rumours are this will last five hours of heavy use or a day with mixed use. The best guess is a day’s use which is mostly on par with other similar devices, but this ties into another question.
Are there any features that have been removed?
Apple promised a number of features that would be included with the watch, but since battery life is always a concern, it’s possible that certain features would have been removed to help improve battery life. What features exactly isn’t clear but it would be expected that they are health-related since that had the most included
How many apps will be available from launch?
If the iPhone’s success has taught us anything, it’s that the strength of an OS really depends on the quality of apps it has at its disposal. Apple really needs this more than anything else as the type of experiences it can offer will either separate it from its competitors or lump them into the same category.
The dream scenario would be apps that offer more than just notifications and take full advantage of the interface (drawing alone has a number of applications while maps will use vibrations to help direct you), but expect this to be touched upon during the announcement.
What’s its primary purpose (and who is its audience)?
This isn’t really something that any smartwatch has answered competently yet and it’s unclear whether Apple will properly answer it tonight.
The initial answer is it will track your activity and complement your lifestyle, but that isn’t exactly a great reason to splash so much cash on it. You could get a fitness tracker for much cheaper and even then, their use is debatable.
If it’s just an easier way to access your iPhone notifications, any other watch can do that. There are numerous other competitors in the market so what makes it different than the rest?
The entire purpose of wearable tech should be you are able to forget about it until you actually need it and unless Apple has a new purpose up its sleeve, it could be a hard sell.
Apple’s event will be live streamed here, but if you don’t have an iOS or OSX device, you can keep up with the updates via @thejournaltech.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Will it tell the time ?
Probably have to download the apple watch app from the apple store for € 6.99.
Err. Dollar pretty much going to surpass the euro within the next 6 months. Phone will cost 400€. Cheap…
I can guess what kind of knobs will be lining up for days to get one of these..Apple knobs
Sent from my iPhone
Lol. They do actually look nice. If you get the right strap colour you could be onto a winner!
I really don’t get this. The idea of having to charge one’s watch every night is going to limit it’s appeal and it’s usefulness.
If you’re spending €300+ on a watch you at least want to be able to wear it for the whole day/week/month without charging it! It also appears that, again in order to preserve battery life, it won’t always display the time. So again you’re paying 300+ for a bit of metal and a rubber strap with a black screen.
Alan…I am sorry to inform you that you will not be getting the advertising contract for Apple watch.
We have decided instead to give the contract to a person who will ignore the embarrassing points you’ve mentioned.
Thanks anyway. :P
I have a watch and a phone, that’s me out .
I had a go of the Galaxy gear one time. The person in the shop told me to move my arm up the way I usually would with a watch if I wanted to see the time on the screen. (It was motion activated). So I did just that, a couple of times and the screen stayed blank. After a couple of goes, the person in the shop told me to “move” my arm, this time more swiftly. It showed up but about 2 seconds after completing the move.
What’s the point in spending 200-300 quid on it when it doesn’t even tell the time properly.
I think the smart watch is a perfect example of how the tech industry have run out of ideas or how they have gotten lazy, or both.
Anyone who spends €300 on that watch needs their head examined….. The next generation might be worth buy or even the generation after that.
Why bother
This wearable tech is just a fad. I cannot see it catching on, it’s not even an independent device, it needs to be linked to an iPhone to work. What we have here is a laser disc for the 21st century. Also it looks shite. #nothinggoingforit
For that price it would want to be gold plated…
Guess what?? I have a phone that displays the time of it! Bingo.
Can’t wait! Sick of bringing my heavy phone with me on runs or walks at the weekend but love the app features for training.
You heavy phone, lol jesus I hope that’s a joke
More awkward than anything if you’re a runner. Watch would be much handier.
have your say