Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
SEMI-STATE ELECTRICITY SUPPLIER ESB has reported a significant drop in profits because of falling wholesale power prices.
But the company, which produces about 43% of all electricity across the island of Ireland, has still delivered a dividend of over €300 million to its government owners.
In its 2014 annual report, ESB said its operating profits had fallen nearly 20% on the previous year’s figures to €552 million for the 12 months.
It follows Centrica, the UK-based parent company for Ireland’s biggest residential supplier, Bord Gáis Energy, reporting an even larger fall in profits last year.
ESB mainly blamed the drop on lower gas prices – which had cut wholesale electricity costs across the board – storm repair costs and reduced availability at its coal-fuelled Moneypoint plant due to repair work.
Meanwhile the semi-state’s retail arm, Electric Ireland, cut prices 2% for residential customers during a year in which energy commodity prices fell dramatically.
It had 37% of the total supply market, or some 1.5 million customers last year.
‘Good progress’ on wind
ESB said it spent about €700 million in energy infrastructure across the island last year as it boosted the share of its power coming from wind turbines.
According to its report, it said it had made “good progress” in building a new wind farm at Woodhouse in Co Waterford.
The farm was expected to come online in the first half of this year, taking the company’s total wind generation to over 400 MW.
Some 92% of ESB’s power generation still came from gas, coal and peat last year, while the remainder came from wind and hydro plants.
The government has agreed a target with the EU that 40% of the country’s electricity needs would come from renewable sources by 2020, although it is in danger of falling short on some goals and being liable for up to €400 million in annual penalties.
First published 10.30am
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
The article is very light on detail and heavy on buzzwords. The reality is business and trade is the only way the world’s poor can become less poor – poverty doesn’t need an explanation only wealth does. Trocaire and the like arent going to reduce poverty only capitalism will. Regulations and rules that are fit for a first world country would act as barriers to development for poor countries. Would China have been able to develop so quickly and lift so many people pit of poverty if they had EU standard regulations on labour etc. No of course not
Why for a change doesn’t she propose a total seizure of the “offshore” assets of these unfortunate country’s elites and their return to them under a proper Sovereign Weath fund structure, for social and economic development. Give the so called owners home currency 25 year bonds in exchange.
As for the climate change issue, that will only be dealt with when the burning of vast quantities of coal for power baseloading, is near totally replaced by new generation nuclear and combined Red Hydrogen production, like now being developed in Japan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uTZWaJU6ho
@Nicholas Grubb: You are misinformed shout Nuclear and red hydrogen. Nuclear plants require a minimum of 15 years to build and bring on line. Even then, we have no viable option for disposing of nuclear waste. The use of red hydrogen requires a whole need infrastructure for this hazardous and explosive fuel.
Trocaire should stick to what they know and do best. They are not qualified to comment on scientific matters like climate change.
have your say