Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
ROBIN WILLIAMS’ WIDOW and his three children have agreed to out-of-court negotiations in a battle over parts of the late actor’s estate — including movie awards such as his 1998 Oscar for “Good Will Hunting.”
A judge in San Francisco delayed until June a hearing on a suit filed in December by Susan Schneider, with whom the comedian and movie star had been married for five years when he died by suicide in August of last year at the age of 63.
Children
Schneider’s attorney, James Wagstaffe, told AFP that over the next two weeks he would meet with Williams’ three children from two previous marriages — Zelda, Zachary and Cody Williams – to try to reach an agreement.
If this fails a mediator will intervene, he said.
The deadline is June, when the battle could reach court and become public.
The dispute centres on objects related to the actor’s career, his childhood and objects from his office, except the furniture that was in the house he shared with his now widow.
The movie awards that Williams won, such as his Oscar, would be worth a lot of money to his children, the attorney said.
Schneider said in her lawsuit that the executors of the fund that the actor created to manage his estate insisted, days after his death, on having access to his home to share out and take possession of some objects.
The widow says all she wants is the suit Williams wore in the ceremony in which he married her and their wedding gifts.
Zelda Williams rejected reports on social media on Monday that she and her siblings had already removed objects from the home of their late father.
- © AFP 2015.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Inside job
@Misanthrope: definition someone with more knowledge than they should have had..
Nice that he wore a hi-vis. Good to see that health and safety is being taken seriously.
Who withdraws €55,000 in cash for any legitimate reason nowadays? Seriously??!!
@Ciarán McPhillips:
Are you trying to say the business was using the 55000 euro for illegitimate reasons
@Casper: what business? There is no mention of any business in the article above.
@Ciarán McPhillips:
Just because it’s not mentioned doesn’t mean it’s not a business
@Casper: well unfortunately I just read the facts outlined in the article. It must be much more interesting reading the news when you don’t allow the facts to get in the way. Maybe extra terrestrials appeared and abducted them and stole the money. I mean using your logic- just because it doesn’t say it…..
@Casper: Excellent retort there.
@Ciarán McPhillips:
Happy Xmas Ciaran
@Ciarán McPhillips: Agree, I smell a large hairy rat, who carries that amount of cash for either personal or business use nowadays ?
It just does not add up or make sense, why did bells not ring in the Bank either ?
@Casper: Well, if you happen to have that kind of cash on you boarding an aircraft, god help you.
@Ciarán McPhillips: hahahahahahaha just so good. I was saying boooourns.
@Ciarán McPhillips: The robbery happened outside Rialto credit union.
Who other than Cash in Transit Security withdraws €55,000 in cash from a Bank? 20-30 years ago understandable as possibly payroll. But today very very rare. One would have to ask questions as to what it was for.
@Mick Jordan:
Isn’t that the work of the Garda, like I am pretty sure this is all the stuff they will be looking into
@Mick Jordan: Paying a large sum of cash is not at all unusual. Many business sale deals are two thirds through the books, one third cash. Used to be fairly common. Same for selling commercial property. About 30% under the counter is common.
The questions would need to be asked of the person receiving it on such a transaction, rather than the person paying it over, assuming the person paying it over got it legitimately. If they took it from a bank, it’s very likely declared and legitimate income. Revenue know about deposits.
@Casper: my question is why did the Garda wait from the 7th to 21st before asking for witnesses
might be what I’ve heard called the ‘manage’ in cork. A couple of people collect money from colleagues all year, bank it, then give it back at Christmas time.
@Aidan Molyneux: that’s my question too. I’ve been in the area many times,but was I there exactly 2 weeks ago at lunch? Why the delay in looking for witnesses?
The more I read this the more peculiar it becomes
No description other an average height
No mention of any age profile
No mantion of any sort of accent
He approached on foot
Left on a bicycle
Having (presumably) followed them by car?
Tia less fishy in Leo Burdocks
@Ciarán McPhillips:
Keep reading you might come up with more
Why did the guards wait two weeks to make an appeal for dash camera video? How could anyone remember two weeks ago
@David Dickson:
Well if they look at the dash camera on that day the camera will jog their memories
@Casper: cams override constantly no storage
@David Dickson: Plus dash cams overwrite themselves.
I don’t think you can walk into a bank and just withdraw large amounts of cash on demand anymore, as far as I know it has to be ordered in advance.
If I was hedging my bets I’d be looking at an inside job.
Not very difficult to tip someone off to a large withdrawal, sure you even know the person’s name and address in advance.
An oddity amongst oddities
It was Santa ,
It’s the season for a bit of silliness and this inside job is pure silliness
@Casper: taking €55,000 out of a bank in cash is pretty silly too, I would say.
@Dave Murray:
Not if they have 55 members of family that they wanted to give a Xmas pressie of €1000 each
An amazing coincidence. Santa was early.
Sounds like a inside job.
Pedal Cycle; why use one word when you can use two
It sounds like a bloke year’s ago in a bank in Talbot st.someone lodged it .?
Probably an “inside family” job!
have your say