Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Updated at 7.30am
FORMER TD AND Minister Ivor Callely will not have to return to prison following the State’s decision to allow him enhanced remission on the prison sentence he received for fraudulently claiming Oireachtas expenses on forged mobile phone invoices.
Callely’s solicitors yesterday confirmed that his application to the Minister for Justice for enhanced remission had been successful. As a result of the Minister’s decision he will not now have to return to Wheatfield Prison for six days to serve out the remainder of his five months sentence.
The High Court in July quashed a refusal by the Minister to grant him remission of sentence. His application was then remitted to the Prison Services for re-consideration.
Pádraig O’Donovan & Company Solicitors, who represent Mr Callely, confirmed to the media today that the former politician had received a letter from the Operations Directorate of the Irish Prison Service informing him of the Minister’s change of mind.
The decision, which was notified to Mr Callely on 20 August, follows the ruling of Mr Justice Anthony Barr quashing the initial decision of the Minister. Judge Barr found the Minister had failed to take all relevant matters into account, which she is obliged to do, when arriving at her decision.
It was learned yesterday that the State is not appealing the High Court’s decision.
Barrister Kieran Kelly had initially brought the application towards the end of last year on behalf of Mr Callely challenging the Ministerial decision not to grant him enhanced remission and seeking his temporary release from prison.
Pending the challenge, Callely was released on bail after four months in prison.
He claimed he was entitled to one third remission of his sentence, as opposed to the normal one quarter, because he had demonstrated good behaviour by participating in structured prison activities, and that he was unlikely to re-offend.
Mr Kelly had argued that the Minister’s decisions were unfair and that Mr Callely was not being treated the same as other prisoners who had committed more serious crimes.
Callely claimed he had been told by staff at Wheatfield Prison that he should have been released early and was only being kept there because of his high profile and the fact he was “a hot potato”. He claimed he was punished twice.
In his judgment Mr Justice Barr said an error of material significance was made when the decision maker had failed to properly assess the available evidence as to the manner and the extent to which Mr Callely had engaged with the authorised structured activities made available to him.
These factors included reports from an assistant prison governor that there was very little chance of Callely reoffending, that he was a first time offender and that he had engaged fully with all the services and structured activities available to him in Wheatfield Prison.
Callely’s conduct in the prison was described to the court by the authorities as “impeccable”. The judge said other factors that ought to have been considered included the manner and extent the prisoner had taken to address his offending behaviour.
Callely’s application for enhanced remission was recommended by the assistant governor, and two retired members of the An Garda Siochana, the Judge also noted.
Mr Callely was unsuccessful in his challenge against the Minister’s refusal to grant him temporary release. The Judge found the Minister had, in a reasonable manner, exercised her discretion when refusing to grant Callely temporary release such as she was entitled to do.
In a subsequent ruling Mr Justice Barr also ruled Mr Callely was entitled to have legal costs paid for by the State.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
I blame the lads in sector 7-G.
Probably Lenny.
Aahh it’s a secret!
Sshhhhhut up!
Sticky tape? ….
I know duck tape can fix most things, but leaky radiation filled pipes is a new achievement! I hope they used some wd-40 too.
This could be a more long term problem than Chernobyl
TEPCO have said it will take anywhere between 40 and 100 years to properly contain the leaks and yet plans going ahead in island next door to us to build more nuclear plants and a kind of softening up process going on here that we should follow suit this madness must stop.
It’s one of the older model reactors, yet it took an earthquake AND a tsunami to damage it enough to leak.
Technology has become much safer since it was originally built – so long as they build the new plant using new tech, I’m not worried.
@Stephen Would you be ok if they built one next door to you
Bill the only reason I wouldn’t like it beside me is because of the eye sore, I would feel perfectly sage.
Fukushima took more of a hammering than than anyone anticipated, a magnitude 9 earthquake and a massive tsunami, 1000s died across tho country.
Fukushima was part of the disaster but wasn’t the disaster itself.
Tepco has consistently underestimated the scale of this problem, they’ve lied to the public and they seem unwilling to accept help from anyone. The IAEA should demand access to Fukushima and compile their own report. The Japanese authorities have lost all credibility on this and things are getting worse.
Fukushima is every bit as bad as chernobyl. Both were melt-down. Only chernobyl had the explosion to go with it.
Melt down?
Yep melt-down. Reactor core cooling system fails. Nuclear fuel rods overheat, and “melt-down” and become an un-contained unmanaged unmanageable mush of molten uranium emitting vast uncontrolled quantities of radiation and heat, contaminating everything it comes close to, including the groundwater system which freely roams around the local, and not so local environment thus distributing the contamination over a wide area.
No nukes, No nukes,
Will all that radioactivity create a mutant lizard like Godzilla and may reek havoc in New York in a few years time??
Yeah, and the Pope is a Catholic.
‘Save The Whales’
Leaking into or out of?
have your say