Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
REPUBLICAN COMMENTATORS AND politicians have been lining up to pour scorn on Barack Obama, in the wake of the US President’s emotional announcement on gun control.
Speaking at the White House earlier, Obama became emotional as he remembered the 20 schoolchildren gunned down in Newtown, Connecticut three years ago.
“Every time I think about those kids, it gets me mad,” the President said, as he welled up.
The limited measures are aimed at tackling rampant gun violence in the US by making it harder to buy and sell weapons.
Republican White House hopefuls like Marco Rubio and Ben Carson have been taking to the airwaves to criticise the announcement – while some of the harshest criticism came from Fox News hosts Andrea Tantaros and Meghan McCain.
His comment about gun violence in Chicago in particular drew the ire of Tantaros, who co-hosts the Outnumbered programme on the conservative news channel.
“He’s almost at the end of his term, and you haven’t seen him go to Chicago and speak out about this issue, and he is uniquely poised to do so really.
Everything he’s doing won’t solve the problem. So I would check that podium for, like, a raw onion, or some No More Tears. I mean… It’s not really believable… ‘And the award goes to…’
Co-host Meghan McCain – a daughter of Senator and former GOP White House candidate John McCain – said Obama’s Chicago remark “didn’t seem horribly authentic”.
“Maybe it is, I don’t know him at all.
But, I agree with you there’s so much more to be done. Again – if you care so much, go to your home town of Chicago instead of talking about God-fearing Americans who just want to protect themselves when Isis is coming into their home town and shooting up 14 people.
(For the record, Obama visited Chicago at the end of October. Gun violence was the main topic of his speech to a conference of law enforcement officials).
Speaker of the House of Representatives Paul Ryan said Obama’s announcement amounted to a “form of intimidation that undermines liberty”.
Plenty of people have also been taking to Twitter to criticise the President’s ‘fake’ and ‘crocodile’ tears.
Humourist John Hodgman evidently agrees:
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Meghan McCain sounds like a chip off the old block. Get it?
I know its a pretty long shot but…is it something to do with McCain’s chips?
Well done fellow child of the 90s!
Out of the frying pan, into the oven..
A filler for his final year in office. Anyone with a brain knows it will be thrown out on the hill. Americans won’t amend their constitution for this. Rabel rabel rabel, distracting the world from what’s really going on with crocodile tears.
@Glenn
It’s an executive order. Therefore, the Republicans on the Hill cannot throw it out.
Kent Brockman and channel 6 news has more credibility than Fox news.
Don’t forget rte … pro government propaganda and hiding the big stories about certain individuals and dodgy water deals ie siteserv …. rte is as bad as any of those right wing pro government stations it’s just bit.more subtle ie no hard questions for bellenda or anyone in government, play down size of national matches etc etc we.all.know the bias.of this so called public broadcaster
It boggles the mind you can easily buy a gun before you are of legal age to drink! Hope this has a positive outcome.
Go fight and maybe die in a war as well.
Id say the Republicans want to mass shoot all Obamas now
People should remember that Fox is a far right news station reporting in a completely biased way, just the way the journal posts completely in favour of left ideologies.
Exactly!
Id have been amazed if fox Didn’t invent the onion story, true to type, that’s what they do for a living. But the big question is What’s gonna happen if trump makes it to the Oval Office? Nuke code and all the rest. Be afraid people be very afraid
Ted Cruz I’m afraid to say would be worse.
If Hillary Clinton dropped dead or decided not to run for some unforeseen ‘ maybe health issue’ then it’s really going to get interesting
“Feel the Bern!”
@Sean or as other might call it truth, or facts.
Fox News is like a satirical news station ran by people who don’t understand satire. It’s almost flawless.
@sean you’ve obviously never read blue hughs articles! ?
Ah, Sean, this site doesn’t do half enough for left ideologies.
They’re pretty good for civil liberties, but.
Typical Murdoch press….
You’re damned if you do….. I despise Fox news. American politics is the biggest joke that never gets a laugh.
I watched that awful badly informed but well connected woman giving an ” opinion ” recently . My cat could have done better
And all of them on that channel look like they’ve been eating raw onions
How fecked up is US society unable to realise that more Americans are killed by other Americans a year that all the gun toting ISIS warriors? Pathetic to be honest.
Fox “News” is just a sick and cynical joke which lacks any journalistic and broadcasting integrity.
Gun culture is a major problem in the US and the Presidential executive actions are modest by comparison to the severity of the problem.
The sincerity was obvious and Obama’s palms were on show at least 4 times. No onions.
89 people per day on average are killed each day in the US by guns. Us gun related deaths are higher than in any other country in the world which is not subject to armed hostilities.
We missed your input on the mass sexual assault in Cologne article.
I have a day job. I don’t have time to access the Journal during the day.
Do they honestly think that the Potus asked someone to get him some onion for the speech tonight
It doesn’t matter if they do. They SAID it, put it out there, and the millions of ignorant underinformed Republicans only hear what they want to hear. It’s enough to say it. Goebbel-type tactics. Despicable and childish, but effective, unfortunately.
Exactly, truth or not it would be widely publicised, any detraction minimal
Faux News caters exclusively to the “information bias” needs of the type of lazy,right-wing reactionaries that are all too common in the US.
Clipping coupons under a burka is not a job Fiona.
@Beachmaster…yep not a word out of the Journal on the mass sexual assaults and robberies reported in Cologne, where one of the victims was a plain clothes police officer.
Germany shocked by Cologne New Year gang assaults on women – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35231046
Rowe are you being sarcastic or did you miss the article earlier ?
My mistake here is my sarcastic font /
No bother Rowe
Ironically enough, it was ex fox news presenter Glenn Beck that was caught rapid having stuff rubbed under his eyes so he could do the crocodile tears thing……
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBmMsTkc9ms
Classic projection right there.
Faux News – for reactionary idiots everywhere.
Faux realz!
Fox news panal of self obsessed bimbos accuse POTUS of faking sincerity.
Irony squared…
Bunch of Malibu Staceys. Fox creates employment for former jocks and cheerleaders. No ‘book lerners’ need apply.
Because theres no way anyone could be genuinely upset about dozens of murdered children right? Further evidence ( like we needed it) that Fox news is staffed and run by psychopaths.
A guy who’s overseen the murder of over 300,000 now all of a sudden in tears over gun laws. R u f kn joking me.
Please tell me you’re not that dumb
Can you post a link to those figures aidan. Very interesting.
Any chance of that link Aidan, or do you want to abuse my mammy and daddy’s garage instead ?
You live there so I’d say it’s the dog that gets the abuse.
All figures are readily available through various sites like the DOD etc
If you’re too stupid to look it up that’s not my fault
Hahahaha. You’re an angry young man. Go out and get your hole and cheer up.
It was so contrived totally put on for the cameras. He’s so full of it.
Yeah, I bet if it was Trump you’d be all like “He’s so genuine. xxxxx”
Trump would project such weakness to the world. The tears are fine, just behind closed doors.
Trump wouldn’t project such weakness to the world. The tears are fine, just behind closed doors.
Make up your mind
Republicans and their supporters,the IQ of pond life.
The only ones showing weakness are the Republicans that are backing Bundy and his terrorists in Oregon who have stated they will murder law enforcement officers if they attempt to curtail their illegal activities.
All 15 of them want to take down the federal government. Says it all really
No I Would think trump is controlled opposition and Obama is the fake messiah that only simple minds adore!
Wouldn’t call it weakness, more like humanity.
Fox News Bimbo says what now…?
Looking at the Human Development Index for 2012 , some interesting comparative figure emerge in relation to gun related homicides on a rate per 1 million people.
Australia 1.4
New Zealand 1.6
IRELAND 4.8
Canada 5.1
Belgium 6.8
Switzerland 7.7
USA (all States) 29.7
Switzerland is regarded as having a high rate of gun related homicide for such a placid and stable society, with a relatively high of social inclusion and cohesion, but we can see that the rate of gun related homicide per 1 million persons in the US is almost 4 times that of Switzerland.
A factor, not the sole factor, but an important factor in homicides in the USA is extremely easy access to legal and illegally held guns.
Obama is right to take these limited Executive actions, even if they are inadequate.
Ubiquitous gun ownership and possession in the US reinforce gun culture and vice versa. Inhibition against using guns is reduced. Then political thought starts to see freedom to own and to display guns as sensible and even admirable.
@Fiona the Convenient One………conveniently left out Brazil that has much stricter gun controls than the US. Brazil’s rate per milliom vs. US is 181 per million vs. US at 33 per million.
http://www.latitudenews.com/story/what-the-u-s-obama-can-learn-from-brazils-epidemic-of-gun-violence-newtown/
And Conveniently left out RUSSIA with much less guns and many more homicides.
—”The most recent homicide statistics for Russia show that there were 21,603 killings in 2009.
According to the FBI, the United States had 13,636 homicides in 2009 with a population that is more than twice as large. More than 80 percent of those killings were gun-related..
http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2013/09/19/224043848/the-u-s-has-more-guns-but-russia-has-more-murders
Some idiot defending gun law. What can you do…..
Russia, Mexico and Brazil have a massive social disorder problem, with organised crime, political corruption and massive social inequality, even worse than the U.S. These are States in a continuing state of disintegration. None of these countries have reliable statistics either on gun ownership or gun related deaths. These countries cintain widespread armed hostilities.
I think that even the U.S. would not consider comparisons with Russia, Brazil or Mexico valid or reasonably comparable.
@Fiona the Convenient One……..Excuses!Excuses! When the facts don’t fit the narrative ..rejuggle them facts.
Patrick…you got owned by Fiona. Just take it like a man for chrissake.
Fiona, you act as if the deaths in America are in stable social areas. The fact is 60% of all gun-related deaths in America are attributed to gangland violence. Gangs, as you know, are generally confined to areas of socio-economical deprivation with lower levels of policing, lack of social amenities and low income levels.
Therefore the comparisons between the death rates in the US, Russia, Brazil and Mexico are relevant.
But but Jason you fail to mention that in America virtually every petty criminal has a gun be it thieves or the small time drug dealer, in Ireland petty thieves or small town drug dealers generally don’t have guns, keeping dressing it up Jason but for anyone who is not hindered by tunnel vision America has a serious serious problem with guns, and you can include about half the adult population of America who recognise this fact.
Do you have any statistics to back up those claims William?
Do I need stats Jason?, Small time drug dealer goes looking for gun in Ireland or small time drug dealer goes looking for gun in America?, do the math Jason.
Where do you get your convenient stats Jason off the NRA website or the NRA sponsored gun stroking magazines?.
Yes William you do need stats, otherwise you look like you’re simply making things up because you don’t know what you’re talking about. It has been proven time and again that it doesn’t take much for a criminal to get access to a firearm here in Europe. A Dutch news channel with zero background in criminality managed to purchase a fully-automatic AK in just 2 weeks illegally to prove how easy it is.
I actually get my stats from the FBI and US Department of Justice who both have a strong interest in curtailing access to firearms in the US. Even their stats don’t show a correlation between increased gun control and reduced gun fatalities in the US.
Try this then Jason,
“The U.S. represents less than 5% of the 7.3 billion global population but accounted for 31% of global mass shooters during the period from 1966 to 2012, more than any other country, Mr. Lankford said, adding that he defines a mass shooter as one who killed at least four victims. The 90 killers who carried out mass shootings in the U.S. amounted to five times as many as the next highest country, the Philippines, according to his research.
Adjusting for population, the difference was smaller: The number of public mass shooters for the U.S. was 65% higher per capita than the per capita rate for the Philippines.
Mr. Lankford, who collected information on mass killings from law-enforcement reports, scholarly articles and news articles, found that mass shooters in the U.S. were much more likely to strike at school and workplace settings, and to use multiple weapons compared with the other countries in the study, more that 170 in all.”
How do you explain then that between 2009 and 2015 Germany had a frequency of mass shootings per million inhabitants which is 1.96x higher than that of the US while the UK had a frequency of 2.46x the US?
It is a simple statistical fact that the number of mass shootings has declined to such a rate that many countries in Europe are actually, on a per capita basis, worse than the US for mass shootings even with stricter gun controls.
FOX news, proof that the news media is bought & paid for, by sociopaths.
At least he cares. A lot more than these “commentators “
Fox News. Say no more.
You would need a heart of stone or to be a gun loving nut not to feel emotional about the deaths of the school children in Sandhook.
Or you need to be able to understand the statistics and facts. Even though the US has the most firearms per capita of the developed world, it doesn’t have the highest death rate per capita or occurrence rate per capita of mass shootings in the developed world.
Roughly 60% of deaths in America to guns are caused by gangland violence using illegal weapons. The next highest category is suicide, followed by accidental shootings. Intentional killings of innocent civilians is a comparatively small percentage of the total number of deaths due to firearms there.
So your just going to ignore the fact that America in 2015 had a mass shooting everyday?
Tina, that still results in a statistically small number of mass shootings per capita. As I said, America is still nowhere near the worst country for mass shootings per capita or fatalities per capita due to mass shootings in the developed world. America currently stands on 0.09 per million fatalities due to mass shootings while Norway, for example, is on 2.0.
Your comparing apples and oranges Jason. America is a continent with a far greater population size than Norway which is country. The issue surrounding guns is that it is too accessible. Many people may have a sane mind to own a gun that does not give them the knowlege to use it effectively. How many deaths related to guns accidents have a occurred in the US? 33000 How many toddlers have shot and killed due to the ineptnes of parents not keeping guns safe? 43 Human error is natural thing but when it comes to guns it always is a fatal consequence.
So, gun death in America is not such a bad thing after all? Good to know and thanks for your advice.
PJ O’Rourke:
““The second item in the liberal creed, after self-righteousness, is unaccountability. Liberals have invented whole college majors–psychology, sociology, women’s studies–to prove that nothing is anybody’s fault. No one is fond of taking responsibility for his actions, but consider how much you’d have to hate free will to come up with a political platform that advocates killing unborn babies but not convicted murderers. A callous pragmatist might favor abortion and capital punishment. A devout Christian would sanction neither. But it takes years of therapy to arrive at the liberal view.”
Another profile, Tommy?
“Invented ” Psychology eh? All this time I thought it was Freud.
It’s Oran the copy and paste king again! Yayyyy! No original thought shall cross his mind. No original idea shall be written. No original opinion shall be expressed. Sure who needs to when you can copy and paste anything you want?!
Very original there Meehawwl.
He 100% correct about you Oran. I’ve pulled you up on your copy and paste skills before. And whatever you do lads, dont introduce any stumbling blocks into Orans philosophy. He doesn’t like that cause it’s hard to find an answer he can rob.
It’s a quote.
The author of the quote is referenced.
Stop upsetting yourself about nothing.
Life’s too short.
I think your really trying to be the most un – original poster in journal history Oran. Have you any thoughts of your own ? If I wanted to read PJ O Rourke, id do it in my own time.
PJ O Rourke doesn’t like liberals.
I don’t like liberals.
I like PJ O’ Rourke.
PJ O Rourke says it better than anyone else.
No need to say more.
Deal with it.
Ahhh PJ O’Rourke…..darling right wing smart arse of the 90′s. He was very funny back then alright. I haven’t heard of anyone quoting him in about 20 years tho’. You need to copy and paste from someone more relevant than him tho’ Oran. (Deal with that).
An onion appears appropriate. Wish he would cry a little over the 324,000 killed by planned parenthood, assisted by the $550M of taxpayers money. Defunding these baby-killers/sellers would be in his power, but not in his heart.
You should concentrate on getting a life yourself.
Poor Paddy has no comprehension of relevance. He will use any issue as an excuse to raise the issue of abortion. Paddy also did this when obsessing in his extremely expressed opposition to same sex civil marriage.
Maybe your own crowd should should shed a few tears for the thousands abused and killed around the world,hypocrite
Paddy is a good man for the crocodile tears,pretends he cares about ‘unborn babies’ but all he cares about is upholding ultra-orthodox catholic doctrine from the palace in Rome.
Wow Paddy, you are a Dinosaur.
Says Paddy Scully, who called the mass abuse, rape and trafficking of children by his cult an act of charity, a man that cannot be trusted around children.
Say a f****ing prayer, crawthumper.
@ Fiona deFreyne The link Fiona is he mourns (real or acted?) one set of murders, while funding another. Selective blindness is the liberals mask, but the Journal is of course the natural environment for the liberal, so defend your mascot if you wish. I never trust a person crying crocodile tears, while their hands are covered in blood stains. I wonder will he be the guest of honour at the murder ball again this year. I can see the mob are collecting, so good night, consider your actions, be well, and a happy New year.
Child rape apologist Scully off to meet up with the child abusers he worships.
@warai aoi
You’re a complete hypocritical bellend
When someone says all Muslims are a terrorists you’re all over them with your self righteous Bullish!t about generalisations and small minorities and racism blah blah blah but it’s OK for you to tarnish every priest in the world as a child rapist and slag a man off because he has a religious faith.
You’re a friendless lefty populist who’ll just go with the flow to try and have a friend. You’re beyond pathetic. Did daddy not hug you??
Well said Aidan .
@Paddy. Are you feeling a bit persecuted ? That’s your faith doing that.
Ah well, it’s sad for the people who hide their identify, and feel that calling other humans “names” is the ultimate offence. To me it’s puerile, and for intellegent readers is evidence that they possess no arguments. Like all bullies, they gang up. So the greatest calamity ever to befall mankind, it’s loathing of its own issue, abortion; becomes the rallying point for hate among mankind. Society today, despite its technical advances, maybe because of its technical advances, loathes all faiths that encourage morality. We kill more humans annually, than the worst despots in history accumulated together, did in a lifetime. Yet somehow we are superior, advanced, modern, and the dispensers of titles to other humans. So the child defender, becomes the abuser, the protector of life is told to ” get a life”, those who defend life are “obsessing”. It’s always amusing how those who promote the murder of the innocents, are obsessed about religion. The only people talking about faith here are those who want to do the killing. Methinks he doth protest too much. Let the neutral reader, observe and be wise, as to who are the innocent, and who are the would-be despots. The name calling has no effect on me as I know whom I am, but it should indicate where the truth lies for the observant reader. Name calling is the trademark of the bully, but these hiding bullies add murder to their arsenal. Obamas tears are hollow, because for him to cry for children on the one hand, while he kills them with the other, is hypocritical. It is even more loathsome because he is the holder of what is one of the highest offices in the world. I hope he is ignorant of that hypocrisy, that his blind spot is so profound that he cannot see the irony. If that is the case, it’s just ignorance, and not deliberate deceit.
“An onion appears appropriate. Wish he would cry a little over the 324,000 killed by planned parenthood, assisted by the $550M of taxpayers money. Defunding these baby-killers/sellers would be in his power, but not in his heart.”
Can you provide any of your “evidence” that Planned Parenthood uses any of the taxpayers money in carrying out abortions ? Or do you just throw stuff out from your left buttocks ?
Paddy if you are so sure about your beliefs, why does it bother you that we question them ? Also , “society today despite its technical advances, maybe because of its technical advances, loathes all faiths that encourage morality”. Two points paddy, the RCC, and everyone apart from you knows this, are not the inventors and guardians of morals, in fact they are the opposite. Secondly, when did a religious idea ever replace a scientific one. I would rather have a mind opened by scientific wonder, than one closed by belief.
@paddy. ” so the child defender becomes the abuser “. Its called priesthood paddy.
Aiden, don’t you have some ‘militamen’ to jerk off too? Then you can help the Roman Catholic Church and its fundamentalists cover up the rape, aduse, murder and trafficking of children with your new child abuse apologist daddy figure Paddy ‘Act of Charity’ Scully.
And I have never said that ever member of the Cult of Roman is a child rapist what I have said is the church has as an organisation shielded child abusers and that for some reason people like yourself and Paddy Scully seem to believe that that is OK.
I’m going to come back in here,too…
Unfortunately,because of the Hyde Amendment ,federal funds are not used in the majority of abortions that are done by Planned Parenthood ..It can only be used if a woman has been raped or if it was through incest, or when a pregnant woman’s life is endangered by a physical disorder, illness, or injury.
South Dakota refuses to use the funding for rape + incest even though it is a violation of the law.
So,you can stick your ’324,000 killed by Obama’ crap, where the sun don’t shine..
Obama became the first sitting president to address planned parenthoods national Conference. The figures I have quoted above are the 2014 figures for planned parenthood. Abortion is an exploitative money making industry, and Obamas fingerprints are all over it.
If you are looking for fall guy for abortion, you need look no further than the Supreme Court that ruled on Roe v Wade which provided for abortions to be legal. Planned Parenthood has been funded through successive presidents since the ruling comes out. Thus, according to your argument, Nixon (R), Ford (R), Carter (D), Reagan (R), Bush (R), Clinton (D), and Bush (R) have countless millions of aborted foetuses blood on their hands. It’s an insane argument on a poorly formed platform. But I’m the forgiving sort, try again.
No president has been as supportive, or as personally engaged as Obama.
So what. That’s a red herring. Planned Parenthood isn’t the only game in town on the abortion front. There are loads of other providers. If you really are anti-abortion, then you would be concerned about all abortions. The reason abortions are legal is because of a Supreme Court case. Period. If Obama sings “Hail Hail to Planned Parenthood” that in now way endorses abortion activity. And, to add to this point, PP services offered and funded by the US government are for women’s health care. Only 3% of their total services are for abortions. That means that 97% are for women’s health care. Knock it off with the junior arguments lad, pull up your panties, and offer something substantive.
I’m an atheist so slagging off religion means nothing to me you moron.
Don’t have to be religious to respect other people’s beliefs or to point out that you are a hypocritical fcktrd who’s only social interaction is online with imaginary people.
Yip, looks like I hit a nerve. The more insults, the more ya win. Well won champ.
The Americans spend so much paranoid time on outside attacks, but yet they kill more of their own each year. It’s a country in chaos.
Did somebody mention Fox news??
Aaaaaaaand here come the loony leftys calling everyone names and violently pressing the red thumb on anything that sounds even remotely sensible or true
Maybe you shouldn’t have used the term loony lefty before accusing people of name calling?
I see irony isn’t a thing of yours – shaking my head in pity
If our anti theist posts offend you, why don’t you pray that we stop ?
Who’s we??? You wish you could use the word “we” you sad pathetic wannabe lefty living in your parents garage extension that you call “your den”
t0sser
Hahahahaa. Did I hit a nerve. You didn’t even get one insult factually correct. Numptý.
Also, who said “we”. Is there anything to be said for another prayer ?
I wish the journal.ie would stop reporting about what fox news says,ie right wing mumbo jumbo and concentrate on some real news
Wonder how much the gun lobbyists paid these people…. NRA…. ISIS….
Obama is a showman and a sublime actor and ive no doubt he engineered the tears. I believe he does care, however i believe he is more than capable of not crying in public.
Worst thing about this channel is people actually believe the bs
@Aidan@Suzie Sunshine@Paddy Scully……..There seems to be people who slambase the Church using fantasy stats. I’m no expert on the subject here, and not a catholic, but the accusation s that all priests/ministers are sex offenders doesn’t ring true and a quick google confirms this,
—”Sexual abuse of minors is not the province of the Catholic Church alone. About 4 percent of priests committed an act of sexual abuse on a minor between 1950 and 2002, according to a study being conducted by John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York.Apr 18, 2010
Five myths about the Catholic sexual abuse scandal below link.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/16/AR2010041602026.html
I don’t think anyone with half a brain is saying that all or most priests are guilty of child abuse, but the institution that is the Catholic Church failed at every opportunity to deal with those that were guilty and in many cases made things worse by hiding and moving around those that committed those evil acts.
Exactly, guilty in the first degree. For every abuser, there were untold numbers who assisted in the cover up. How many priests is 4% and how many victims had each priest and you’ll find a number in the thousands. Thats the number I’m interested in, no matter what way you twist them. Thousands of young lives ruined. But you go ahead and continue being an apologist.
If God is so great and powerful, how come he let all those priests get caught?
Yes,Paddy,we know that ‘not all priests or nuns abuse’ -but we are more aware of the paedophillia crimes by members of their flock and the cover ups by the bishops etc etc..
Lol meehawwl. Can I use that ?
‘Merican twerps
No tears from Obama for all the children killed by hit drone strikes?https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/category/projects/drones/drones-graphs/
John Hodgeman was satirising
America has always suffered from the threat of class divisions and ethnic race divides, but Obama did try to implement free medical services, change gun laws and implement better foreign policy. Front runners for the Republicans offer what? Trump?
Plutocratic – Big business politicians seek to keep working class divided and broke in order to preserve banking and conglomerate companies. Obama has been one of the best presidents since Kennedy
I thought Fox ‘News’ was a comedy channel before realising that they were serious
Obama is pathetic
Republicans know no shame.
Ugly ugly women. Both inside and out. Pathetic.
5 tw@s on a couch, full of shit, easily as much bollocks as obamas tears, give it a rest!!
She looks like she could fit a raw onion in her mouth. Professional like. In reality though you could actually kill someone with an onion just as much as a rock or a brick or a hammer or a gun. We need to ban onions, rocks, bricks, hammers and guns.
How do I reach these kiiiiiids
Sad to see Americans so quick to dismiss emotion and a pro-active response when discussing Americans murdering their fellow citizens, and then attempting to pivot the conversation towards the Middle East. Like it’s not even possible and accidental. The hypocrisy, given they then openly acknowledge gun violence as an “issue” and a “problem” without naming and rationally talking through the issues and problems. Accusing the President of politicising, as they proceed to politicise. So much wrong and hugely disrespectful to all concerned with this. Shameful display by so-called journalists, including the host who allows it.
have your say