We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
THE CENTRAL STATISTICS Office (CSO) has published statistics comparing modern-day Ireland to the country in and around 1916.
The figures, released to mark the centenary of the Easter Rising, look at topics such as population, marriages, death rates and emigration.
Comparing censuses from 1911 and 2011, there has been a 46% increase in the population – up from 3.1 million to 4.5 million people. Age and county-by-county breakdowns can be read here.
The death rate has decreased in the last century – from 16.1 per 1,000 people in 1916 to 6.3 per 1,000 in 2014.
Comparing causes of death in both periods, there has been a marked decrease in influenza and TB deaths, and a large increase in deaths by suicide (although this could be partially due to fewer deaths being registered as suicides in the past, something that is still an issue today).
Interestingly, the number of deaths due to heart disease hasn’t change hugely.
In terms of marriages, the number of Catholic unions registered has decreased from 92% to 60%.
Meanwhile, there are a LOT more cars on the road – up from 9,850 in 1915 to 1.9 million in 2014.
Rising leaders
The CSO has compiled biographical information about people involved in the Rising, including Pádraig Pearse, James Connolly and Countess Constance Markievicz.
Details about the men and women of the Rising can be accessed on the CSO website.
Baby names
Statistics have also been provided to highlight which baby names were popular in 1911 and 2014.
There was much more variety in names in 2014 for baby girls. In 1911 the top 40 names for baby girls were used to name 63% of all baby girls compared to just 35% in 2014.
Mary was used to name 12.1% of baby girls in 1911 with 6.7% called Bridget. By 2014 the most popular name for baby girls, Emily, was used for just 1.9% of girls while Sophie was used for 1.4% of girls. Neither Emily nor Sophie appears in the top 40 list from 1911.
Boys names have become more varied too. In 1911 the top 40 names for baby boys were used to name 69% of all baby boys compared to just 41% in 2014.
One in ten baby boys in 1911 were named John with just under one in ten called Patrick. By 2014 the most popular names (Jack and James) were each used for about 2% of baby boys.
The full publication can be accessed here.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
I’m not suggesting single use plastic items should not be banned but in the West it’s really little more than self-satisfied virtue signalling at this stage given that most of the plastic waste in the oceans comes from Asia and Africa. Every little helps though! Now if only we could convince the rest of the world of that. Mind you Justin Trudeau is usually self-satisfied and virtue signalling anyways. This article gives a relatively clear outline of the source of the plastic waste in the oceans.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/06/90-of-plastic-polluting-our-oceans-comes-from-just-10-rivers/
@William Tallon: why not instant ban on plastic sure haven’t we got biodegradable plastic now are these boyos still doing oil companies favours at a cost to the planet.one wonders…
@William Tallon: A lot of countries pay Asia and other countries to take there plastic waste.
@Robert Phelan: I think it’s more to do with profits, laziness and being slow to change more than ‘Big Oil’ to be honest. Public pressure works eventually. It also does no harm for big companies to flaunt their green credentials as it’s good for business in the present climate, pun intended. If anyone from Big Oil is reading this then please get in touch. I’ll only be too happy to post lots of positive comments about you on the Journal site for a large fee. Just joking of course! But if anybody from Big Oil is actually reading this…
@William Tallon: The west never recycled any plastic- they sent it all to poor countries and there was zero accountability for what happened once it left our shores.
Disgusting fat overconsuming self satisfied Germans are now burning their “recycling” in open fires in Poland because they can’t chuck it into the ocean via China anymore.
How dare they do it before us Irish, don’t they know we do everything first, ban smoking in Public Places, bring in Marriage equality, proclaim ourselves Alcoholics. Our plan to be First to save the Planet is just ruined now.
@John Declan:
Socked us to it!
And who will pay for it, joe soap as usual
@Ian James Burgess: your kids and your grandkids Joe soap won’t earn much if we destroy the planet.
Fantastic
have your say