Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

www.pulsevenue.ie

Donegal nightclub slapped on wrist for 'shag a ginger' night ad

The advertising watchdog has ordered that the ad not be used in the same format again.

THE ADVERTISING WATCHDOG has upheld a complaint against a poster promoting a “shag a ginger” night at a Donegal nightclub.

The Pulse Venue in Letterkenny sparked controversy last year after advertising the event online and through local media.

The poster in question stated that “gingers” would be given free entry to the venue before midnight.

It said a DJ named “Ginger Nuts” would perform on the night and that a hairdressing team would be on hand to dye patrons’ hair red.

The ad featured a picture of two red-haired people with the overhead caption “Free condom giveaway”.

The name of the event was changed to “Kiss me, I’m ginger” after a local priest campaigned for the original theme to be dropped.

Mental health

One woman who complained to the Advertising Standards Authority for Ireland (ASAI) said she considered the marketing campaign to be “highly offensive and derogatory”.

The complainant said she had experienced both verbal and physical abuse as a child because of her red hair. She told the ASAI she believed this type of advertising to be damaging to the mental health of other young people.

The ASAI upheld the objection and ruled that the ad not be used in the same format again.

The watchdog said the business did not respond to the complaint and therefore failed to substantiate the claims made in the poster, as required by advertising rules.

The poster was one of 13 ads recently found to be in breach of ASAI guidelines. The other rulings can be read here.

Read: Irish company’s Caitlyn Jenner ad ‘offensive, transphobic and demeaning to transgender people everywhere’

Read: Here’s why people thought this ad for smoked ham was ‘offensive and disrespectful’

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
34 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ange Mahon
    Favourite Ange Mahon
    Report
    Jul 18th 2011, 5:06 PM

    How right joan burton is. Guaranteed to save millions if she goes ahead with this idea. Too many people choosing to scrounge off others. On the other hand, it is awful the amount of people that are genuinely out of work. They deserve every cent they get.

    37
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute William Odee
    Favourite William Odee
    Report
    Jul 18th 2011, 5:39 PM

    Well done to you and all the people who agree with you you’re idiots. When there was full employment in this country we were running at 3% unemployment, of those only a small proportion of people were long term unemployed. To tar the 14.7% who are currently in such difficulty is to display a level of ignorance all too common on this isle of ours. Instead of being castigated by morons as scroungers, people unfortunate enough to be unemployed should be supported and encouraged, that is essentially what any research into the matter has shown, the stereotype of someone chosing unemployment as a lifestyle choice is not supported by any evidence whatsoever and is simply a sign of ignorance on the part of anyone who blows this nonsense out of their mouths, as careless and thoughtlessly as shite comes out of a cow’s arse.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Roos Demol
    Favourite Roos Demol
    Report
    Jul 18th 2011, 5:46 PM

    William, regardless of who is right or wrong, you might want to watch your language… you’re not going to win an argument this way

    20
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ange Mahon
    Favourite Ange Mahon
    Report
    Jul 18th 2011, 11:55 PM

    William- Firstly I dont like the way you refer to me and those who like this comment as idiots,everyone is entitled to an educated opinion & yours is appreciated once you have a valid point to make.With reference to the 14.7% who are in difficulty at the moment, it is the thoughts of myself & im sure many individuals that they well deserve to receive their social welfare as they cant find a job in this economic crisis, but to say that they have been offered a job and turned it down is another story their payments definitely should be cut. With reference to scroungers- Do you feel confident knowing those who work hard and pay their high taxes from their pay packet are paying others weekly s.w. payments so they may maintain a standard of living beyond that of which a traditional worker may have once all the bills are paid!? Our taxes are no longer being used to improve our health services, roads, create new employment etc, it is being returned to many individuals who have refused work from the day they were born. I am not criticising people who have unfortunately lost their jobs due to this economic crisis- plenty of them dont want to be on social welfare & would gladly take a job if they got one.

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Robert O' Connor
    Favourite Robert O' Connor
    Report
    Jul 18th 2011, 5:21 PM

    Or ‘receive no money’ even. Why should we foot the bill for anyone that’s too lazy to work for living?

    27
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds