Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

London's eye: Incredible footage captured after drone user broke all the rules

Should the cameraman have done it?

SEE PICADILLY CIRCUS, TRAFALGAR Square and Buckingham Palace like you’ve never seen them before.

A drone user seemingly broke every rule in the book to capture these great shots of London city, with another YouTube user uploading the video yesterday.

However, not everyone is happy with the output. Many drone users have accused the flyer of giving them a bad name by flouting the rules so blatantly, according to an article in the Evening Standard.

Filmmakers have been prosecuted in the UK for offences under the Air Navigation Order 2009.

Was it worth the risk?

GIF

Own a drone? Beware, a man is in court for flying one over some famous places

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
50 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jeroen Bos
    Favourite Jeroen Bos
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 4:27 PM

    So it costs the economy € 1m a day. I wonder how much it costs the economy when employees take a tea break, talk to their colleagues, text a friend, watch non work related internet content, use the toilet and so on. This is all sensational use of figures.

    81
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Feargal Garvin
    Favourite Feargal Garvin
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 5:08 PM

    Smokers do all those things too.

    55
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Joan Featherstone
    Favourite Joan Featherstone
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 5:32 PM

    You a smoker by any chance??

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Barry
    Favourite Barry
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 4:17 PM

    Companys almost have themselves to blame here, many do nothing to discourage the numerous smoking breaks which many employees take yet there are not part of official shifts breaks/lunches

    If a non-smoker took that many “fresh air” breaks in a day they’d likely get warnings for not doing their job

    Double standards and ironic given the time lost to smokers in sick days, unofficial breaks etc

    71
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alex simon
    Favourite Alex simon
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 5:57 PM

    Spot on!!!!!! Where is Joe? He is gone for a smoke. We should all have these breaks or none at all. Why should smokers get special treatment.

    53
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sneaky Jedi
    Favourite Sneaky Jedi
    Report
    Jul 18th 2011, 9:01 AM

    Breaks every hour are important for vision and concentration. Whether you smoke or not you should take breaks.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ryan Murphy
    Favourite Ryan Murphy
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 4:14 PM

    Jeez, with the amount of duty, I would have thought smoking generated a tidy profit for the exchequer, even taking costs into account.

    I won’t feel so patriotic when I light up, now :(

    57
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kevin Finnegan
    Favourite Kevin Finnegan
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 4:27 PM

    I cant believe tabacco is costing us that much it doesnt make sense that it legal to buy something that does nothing but kill you and yet its illegal to buy weed

    55
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Patrick Denny
    Favourite Patrick Denny
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 6:54 PM

    When I think of the ‘cost’, I think on 2 levels; the first cost is the obvious net economic and social deficit. The other is watching my grandmother and contemporaries have several years of appalling poor quality of life because Ireland wouldn’t call the smelly Class A drug what is. I have little sympathy for modern smokers, who I would like to stop blocking 1 in 6 hospital beds ultimately with their ‘lifestyle choice’. So quit whining.

    30
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stephen Downey
    Favourite Stephen Downey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 8:00 PM

    Most modern day smokers tend to be the ones who get hooked early in their teens. I don’t know the cig companies do it, but they have mastered the practice of enticing young men and women to become addicts while our government sits by and pretends to care with smoking bans, demonisation and high taxes.
    With attitudes like this toward smokers, a few smoke breaks during the day is the least they deserve.

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kieron Jnr Ward
    Favourite Kieron Jnr Ward
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 8:06 PM

    Some smokers aren’t looking for sympathy, some of us pay our own health insurance(at a higher cost, and rightly so) and our own critical illness cover and life assurance(at a higher cost, and rightly so) but whilst it’s popular to attack the smoker, people seem to forget the drinker…. alcohol abuse in this country is rampant, you’d need only try to be seen in A&E any given weekend…. what do you think alcohol abuse costs the state? and what of the ‘social deficit’ in those cases? Cigarettes don’t make some people beat their wives or child(ren) or attack strangers…. but you better believe alcohol is present in a lot of cases where these disgusting incidents occur.

    As for additional breaks in the workplace for smokers, shouldn’t happen and employers shouldn’t tolerate it.

    22
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute All Aboutdavey
    Favourite All Aboutdavey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 9:03 PM

    Patrick just wondering where you got the 1 in 6 ratio from, both of my parents are extremely sick and have been for some months and what I see everyday when I visit the hospital is a load of junkies and alcoholics taking up beds and clogging up A&E. Dont hear anyone complaining about how much they cost the tax payer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They dont work – they get the dole. They dont work – they get the medical card. They are mainly criminal and cost the taxpayers billions every year between what it costs to keep them fed, clothed and housed in our prisons. You want to have a go at a section of society, pick on those more deserving of it – the junkies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute neuromancer
    Favourite neuromancer
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 6:54 PM

    Where I previously worked it was not uncommon for workers to have an unofficial smoke break each hour, lasting anywhere up to 10 minutes. A cup of tea of coffee was also brought to the break aswell. This worked out at about 120 minutes over the space of a 12 hour shift. Yeah 3 hours.

    I can recall getting reprimanded for going over my break time, or being late back from a break, but I didn’t smoke. I was late and it was nothing to do with anyone else. I said I didn’t smoke but that didn’t hold water.

    The problem is that smoking was fine, if you smoked and needed one, no one said you couldn’t, and the rules were very lax if you smoked.

    It’s not recent knowledge that smoking is bad for you, yet nothing is really trying to emiminate smoking, it’s just moved to the “beer garden” or the “smoke shed”. The problem still exists. And young people knowing the full risk of smoking, eh it might give you lung cancer, continue to smoke into their twenties and later, it’s still socially acceptable to smoke.

    And here is the funny thing, every smoker would love to quit, or they have tried to quit at least once. Whether it because it’s an expensive habit, because they feel outcasted from their non smoking friends, because they can’t smoke in public buildings or is it because of health reasons.

    Probably moreso because of health reasons, I’d say.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute All Aboutdavey
    Favourite All Aboutdavey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 8:50 PM

    I’m a smoker and I dont want to quit!!!!! I really really enjoy it.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stephen Downey
    Favourite Stephen Downey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 5:27 PM

    Just more demonising of smokers. If it costs €1m a day, then the ‘ ban on smoking in the workplace ‘ has been a disaster. Alternatively, you could restore the right for smokers to smoke in offices, factories etc, then they won’t feel a need for smoke breaks.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Feargal Garvin
    Favourite Feargal Garvin
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 5:38 PM

    That would be an abuse of the right of their colleagues to work in a safe environment. The smoking ban will save us more in the long run by reducing illness caused by passive smoking and by acting as a disincentive to smoke. There should be no going back on the ban.

    37
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kieron Jnr Ward
    Favourite Kieron Jnr Ward
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 7:59 PM

    I’m a smoker and there’s no way I’d like to see the smoking ban overturned, if anything the smoking ban has helped me cut down dramatically…. I only go for one when I get my lunch hour or 15 min breaks with the rest of the staff, if there’s people out there taking the piss by taking extra breaks then it’s down to their employers to put the foot down.

    33
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute BW
    Favourite BW
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 4:29 PM

    Shortall also said that the health services would be spending a remarkable €23bn treating tobacco-related diseases in the coming decade.

    €1.2bn of this cost is covered by the taxes levied by the State on cigarettes, but the rest must be covered from the public purse

    —————————–
    so is that 1.2bn cost recovered per year of or over the 10 years? My guess is, it’s per year not over the 10 years….

    Therefore, 12bn will be recovered through taxes not the 1.2bn stated.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute vv7k7Z3c
    Favourite vv7k7Z3c
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 4:38 PM

    Yes, apologies – the ‘per year’ was accidentally left out of this sentence. The state makes €1.2bn pa in tobacco duties and taxes.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute All Aboutdavey
    Favourite All Aboutdavey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 8:45 PM

    The other 12 billion they can recover from not having to pay us smokers the old age pension given that we are all going to die younger!!!!!!!! So that makes it a fair deal all around for everyone :O)

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Barry
    Favourite Barry
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 7:49 PM

    Give it another 10-15 years and if your a smoker it’ll be a big negative for any job interview.

    Also expect health insurance to be through the roof for smokers v non-smokers (and rightly so)

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stephen Downey
    Favourite Stephen Downey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 8:15 PM

    Smokers should not have to pay anymore insurance than anybody else. They are doing nothing illegal. Why should they be targeted and not drinkers of alcohol?
    I can’t remember the last time someone drove a car into a wall or slashed someone else’s face after smoking 10 Silk Cut during the day.

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kieron Jnr Ward
    Favourite Kieron Jnr Ward
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 8:36 PM

    No expecting about it Barry, it’s already here…. I pay double what my brother pays for life assurance and serious illness cover.

    8
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute All Aboutdavey
    Favourite All Aboutdavey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 9:07 PM

    Then if thats the case so should alcoholics!

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mike
    Favourite Mike
    Report
    Jun 16th 2013, 9:11 AM

    Yet you have no trouble paying for cigarettes.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fiachra Maolmordha Ó Raghallaigh
    Favourite Fiachra Maolmordha Ó Raghallaigh
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 9:50 PM

    In a more general sense, businesses should be allowed to actively discriminate against people with unhealthy “lifestyle choices”: smokers, heavy drinkers and those overweight (I mean those with more than a little bit of pudge). Simply put, these people are more likely to lose days due to illness, because of their “lifestyle choice”. It’s obvious that the employer is investing a lot in the employee, and is entitled to expect a reasonable return on the wages he is paying out. If the staff are taking too many smoking breaks, or taking too many sick days, then that’s a major cause for concern to the business.

    However I think that employers should take more steps to ensure that their staff are healthy, namely paying for local gym membership as part of their contract. If they’re not doing physical work as part of their I know of a few of large businesses in Dublin that had (I think one or two went into liquidation) that had a swimming pool on site. This was so that they could make sure that their staff were fit and healthy, and wouldn’t take too much sick leave.

    When it comes down to it, there needs to be a greater emphasis on personal responsibility in this country, in terms of diet and lifestyle. I’ve only tackled one dimension of this problem: the cost to businesses. As mentioned in the article, there is the ticking time bomb of healthcare costs in the future. This does not only apply to the usual suspects – namely drug takers, but to everyone who drinks too much or smokes too much. Those who buy counterfeit cigarettes can look forward to an even greater amount of illnesses in the future (as shown in a BBC Panorama documentary last year: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00zftc4/Panorama_Smoking_and_the_Bandits/). In those cases, there is absolutely no regulation as to what is put into them, and there are all to often unsafe levels toxins in them, and no VAT is gained to even partially offset this.

    Simply put, a lot of people (far from everyone) here need a wakeup call. If one could be denied employment, or health insurance, for smoking, overdrinking and overeating, how many would continue these unhealthy habits?

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jeroen Bos
    Favourite Jeroen Bos
    Report
    Jul 18th 2011, 10:22 AM

    “If one could be denied employment, or health insurance, for smoking, overdrinking and overeating, how many would continue these unhealthy habits?”

    Start your own business! You can smoke as much as you like. And again it’s good for the economy too

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rory Mc Closkey
    Favourite Rory Mc Closkey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 9:44 PM

    yeah róisín, we are in this mess because of the unemployed, the public service, the smokers, the drinkers, the immigrants working social welfare scams etc. Nothing to do with your willingness to bail out banking gamblers and running scare tactics. Oh we have to pay them, we would have no money in our atms if we didn’t pay them! simple fact is that if we dumped the bank debt today we could borrow on the open market tomorrow. most smokers are poor. Yeah róisín, blame your very labour supporting constitents for the mess you are willing to perpetuate.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Feargal Garvin
    Favourite Feargal Garvin
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 8:53 PM

    Sorry Stephen, smokers cost health insurance companies more so of course the premiums should be higher. Drinking is a separate issue and irrelevant.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute All Aboutdavey
    Favourite All Aboutdavey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 9:17 PM

    I dont get how you can say that drinking is a seperate issue and irrelevent. The article is about how much smokers cost the taxpayer and what we are saying is that those people in our society who are alcoholics also cost the taxpayer a shit load of money aswell. Smokers dont ring in sick on a Monday morning because they’d smoked 20 cigarrettes the day before, but had they drank 20 pints the day before chances are they are going to make that call to work! But I’m right there with you on us having to pay more health insurance.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kieron Jnr Ward
    Favourite Kieron Jnr Ward
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 9:18 PM

    Separate issue but in no way, shape or form is it irrelevant.

    12
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Feargal Garvin
    Favourite Feargal Garvin
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 10:32 PM

    Irrelevant to the issue at hand.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Neil Murphy
    Favourite Neil Murphy
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 7:45 PM

    Next they’ll be stapling tar-filled arteries to packets of fags..

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute All Aboutdavey
    Favourite All Aboutdavey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 9:05 PM

    lol

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stephen Downey
    Favourite Stephen Downey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 7:01 PM

    These days I only smoke when socialising in a pub. As far as smoking in the workplace was concerned I always that whatever it was I had to do was done.
    This is simply a blatant attack on smokers, paving the way for the government to hit them hard in the budget. No doubt the increased tax take will be passed on to businesses to cushion the loss of €1m a day?

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stephen Downey
    Favourite Stephen Downey
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 5:58 PM

    Fergal

    According to the ban on smoking in the workplace will save us more in the long-term from illnesses caused by passive smoking. I agree. The Minister most probably knows this too. Yet she depicts smokes break as a cost. Instead, as you have rightly pointed out, these smokes breaks as a consequence of the ban will in the long run save money.
    Like I said earlier, demonisation of smokers.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Feargal Garvin
    Favourite Feargal Garvin
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 6:38 PM

    That’s a fair point. However, smoke breaks were a feature of workplaces even before the ban.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute neuromancer
    Favourite neuromancer
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 6:55 PM

    Correction 120 minutes should be 2 hours.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Lisa Saputo
    Favourite Lisa Saputo
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 5:41 PM

    But how much tax does it bring in?

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Feargal Garvin
    Favourite Feargal Garvin
    Report
    Jul 17th 2011, 5:44 PM

    Read the article maybe.

    26
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds