Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
SCOTLAND’S FIRST MINISTER has said that its regional parliament may be able to stop Britain’s exit from the European Union.
In an interview with the BBC, Nicola Sturgeon has argued that Holyrood may still hold veto power over the vote.
Speaking to BBC’s Sunday Politics Scotland programme, Sturgeon said that it was her belief that the Scottish Parliament would have to provide legislative consent for the referendum to be enacted.
“Looking at it from a logical perspective I find it hard to believe that there wouldn’t be that requirement,” she said.
I expect the UK government would take a very different view on that and we’ll have to see where that discussion ends up.
She was then asked by host Gordon Brewer whether this would mean Holyrood voting against the result, even at the risk of infuriating voters in the rest of the UK who voted to leave.
Sturgeon said that this fury would be, “similar to the fury of many people in Scotland right now as we face the prospect of being taken out of the European Union against our will”.
In the immediate aftermath of Thursday’s vote Sturgeon called for a second referendum on Scottish independence.
Scotland voted by 62% to 38% to remain in the EU, joining London and Northern Ireland as the three regions of the UK who voted to remain in.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Meh.
A watch that you have to charge daily ?
Just not practical. Why bother when you have your phone with you.
Which, depending on usage, you may have to charge daily.
I’m not convinced by any of these smart watches. What’s wrong with a “Thick as two short planks” watch? Stick a battery in, last couple years, and it tells the time.
That’s why you never but first generation of a new product. I’ll consider the third or fourth version
Better still, buy an automatic mechanical watch and you’ll never have to get a battery for it. And it’s kinda cooler when you think of this little engine running on your wrist.
Or a solar powered version , mine works great and automatically corrects its self each night with wave receptor. I expect it to our live me.
I just don’t get smart watches. I wouldn’t want to charge my watch every day. Not only that, but I prefer a normal watch. It’s more stylish!
I picked up a Samsung Gear fit last year for 100 quid when upgrading my phone. I wasn’t convinced when I got it but I have to say, I really like it now.
I’ve to charge it every 4 days or so overnight, which isn’t a hassle and nowadays, with the notifications that appear on screen I never take my phone from my pocket unless it’s something I need to reply to. Also, I hadn’t worn a watch in years and paying 100 for a watch doesn’t seem foolish.
It’s worth noting most of what I’ve said said above does not apply for the Apple watch…
Brave. Lol. Anti-Apple troll with very weak argument! You just could not resist…
If you say so, but I’m replying from my iPhone 5S while my 2011 MacBook Pro is beside me so your point is invalid, pal.
I can’t see myself buying one of these gadgets.
Is it just me or do all the straps look hideous?
It’s just you. Soz.
I was thinking the opposite, Neal.
I’m not a fan of rubber straps (stoppit!) but I think the colourful ones look good. The cheaper versions look better than the metal ones. It’s not a great looking watch at all though. I think some of the other smart watch offerings from other companies are streets ahead.
That said I still wouldn’t buy one. I’d never remember to charge the f’ing thing!
It looks more Fisher Price than Apple.
I’ll stick with my Breitling thank you very much!
Breitling is probably one watch brand which is even more vulgar that the Apple Watch, truth be told.
I like most of their styles, A few of the over the top ones are tacky.
The best way to have a jab at someone wearing a Breitling watch is to look at them assumingly and say, ‘Oh cool, so do you own your own plane or have a fractional lease?
Very good!
I find them far too blingy. Most of the bracelets are polished which just screams! I kind of like the Superocean though, but only on the “chain-link” type strap. The Navitimer is a bit of an horological masterpiece, but it’s too big for me.
Personally I love mechanical watches, I have several from different companies. I don’t see anything vulgar about them. But each to their own I guess!
I love mechanical watches too David, just not Breitlings. That was my point. I have some great automatics which I love and wouldn’t swap for an Apple Watch in a million years.
I agree about the bracelets on most of their models. I have the Navitimer 01 on black leather strap. I love it. I don’t think I’d ever buy the Apple watch, I prefer the old fashioned mechanical ones.
Probably because they are nothing special . Maybe the apple fanatics are finally copping on. There are much better looking / more functional smart watches out there .
Where can I buy the gold watch for 1200 euro ? I see a killing to be made.
Arrived this morning at 7am.
Don’t know what they’re saying there’s major fanfare everywhere and on all the social media sites here.
Though I do have to laugh… I wanted to try the fitness application because I’m concerned about my weight. Maybe try going to the gym then instead of spending two days outside the Apple Store.
You could also buy a weighing scales and weigh yourself after a brisk walk each day. Worked for people way before apple thought of this genius idea.
1 day battery life on a watch… haha funny that! Apple have said it needs to be re-charged nightly.
iRubbish for iFools.
iShutup
Ok hang on a second. This whole fitness thing. If i buy an Apple Watch and go for a run do i need to bring my iPhone with me? If so then whats the fuppin point father!!
And today’s Father Ted comment comes from…..
Pointless. But then, I had a manager 15 years my senior call me ‘old school’ for wearing a watch recently (instead of using my phone as a clock).
My watch charges itself on the kinetic energy of my moving arm. Why would I want a want a watch that needs to be plugged in every night? To show me the notifications I’m missing on my phone?
I stay in hotels at least once a week on average, 95% of which don’t have a plug near the bed. This would spend more time out of power than in power for me.
Smart phones are really just trying to force a gadget revolution where one isn’t needed. If I’m going to have wearable tech then I expect it to do something a little more, and at least convert my motion into energy.
I do own a GPS watch, but its for running, and doesn’t need to be any ‘smart’er than it is.
The gloss has been taken off Apple Down Under following revelations 2 weeks ago before a Senate Inquiry
the Apple Australasia is a subsidiary of Apple Ireland and that Apple uses the “Double Irish” to aggressively
minimise its Aussie tax. And by the look of it, Ireland’s reputation also took a body blow.
Apple is on the nose in Aus since a Senate Inquiry Down Under 2 weeks ago revealed that Apple may
not be a good corporate citizen-taxpayer due to a complicated supply arrangements via Ireland which
permits it to aggressively minimise its Australian tax. This has stunned many loyal Apple users down here.
They don’t mention that in order for the watch to work – you have to have the expensive iPhone also to connect it too.
Thanks but no thanks. 70%+ of Apples stuff comes from their genuine rival Samsung. Google it of you think this is false.
If I want something expensive in my life, I would (if I had rock in the head) vote for FG and Labour again in 2016 – not buy this over-priced stuff.
People complaining about having to charge it every day seem to be oblivious to the fact that watches and clocks used to have to be wound up every day.
have your say