Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
YESTERDAY MORNING, RTÉ radio led with a report of the killing of two people in a nightclub in Fort Myers, Florida.
The only possible explanation for the prominence accorded this incident is that it was perceived as part of a pattern of killings that are now perceived as an escalating feature of the modern world and as terrorism.
By terrorism I mean the use of violence to cause terror amid the mass of a population for a political purpose.
Almost by definition, terrorism works only with the complicity of the media, for without the sensational reporting of such incidents, the intended terror would not materialise.
Worse than that, incidents that have no political purpose at all and where the perpetrators have no intention of causing mass terror, nowadays get sensational reporting anyway, as seems to have been the case with the Fort Myers killings.
Death tolls
The killings in France last November when 137 people were murdered in Paris and in Nice on Bastille Day when 84 people were killed will cause merely a minor spike in the homicide figures for 2015 and 2016 in France.
In 2014 in France, when there were no terrorist killings, there were 792 homicides.
In Germany, the Munich killings of nine people will hardly be noticed in the homicides in Germany for 2016 – in 2014 there were 716 homicides.
Nevertheless the usually sober Guardian headlined these killings with: ‘A Fearful Europe Holds its Nerve.’
There were fewer than 3,000 people killed in the mass terrorist attack on the United States on 9/11 but even those killings caused just another minor spike in that year’s homicide figures.
There were 12,553 murders in America in 2013 and, incidentally, the crime rate and the homicide rate have been declining steadily over the past few decades, Donald Trump’s protestations notwithstanding.
A threat?
Of course every one of these killings are horrific and cause awful grief to the loved ones of the victims and awful pain to the thousands more injured.
But what is happening in Europe and the United States is not existential, by which I mean a threat to our very existence or to our way of life or even to our contentment.
And yet that is what a hysterical media convey, which would not matter if that did not cause mass demands for ‘action’ and, in turn, political stunts that invariably do more damage than good.
There is a vivid example from our own history in dealing with terrorism. In December 1972, Des O’Malley, then Minister for Justice, introduced an amendment to the Offences Against The State Act, permitting the introduction into evidence in criminal trials where the accused is charged with membership of an illegal organisation of the opinion of senior garda officers on whether the accused was a member or not.
The sentence for membership was one year.
The amendment was roundly condemned by Fine Gael and Labour spokespeople as repressive, tyrannical, fascist and the like.
Judges in the Special Criminal Court jailed up to 100 people charged with membership solely on the basis of the stated opinion of senior gardaí – this was deemed sufficient basis for conviction where the accused failed to give contradicting evidence as, at the time, the IRA did not ‘recognise’ the courts.
Four years later, when Fine Gael and Labour were in office and following the murder of the British ambassador in Sandyford in July 1976, the very people who had denounced the 1972 Amendment then moved to give it further effect by increasing the sentence for membership to five years.
This caused the IRA to advise it members to recognise the courts and to contradict the evidence of senior gardaí and, as a consequence, very few, if any, people charged with membership were convicted and jailed subsequently.
The United States introduced draconian measures following the 9/11 killings and there is no evidence they achieved anything. France is doing the same now, probably with the same effect except to deepen the alienation of those sections of the French population against whom the measures are directed.
And this is being done because of the mass hysteria generated by the media.
There are times when the best option is to do nothing. Who now, aside from Tony Blair and the cadre of familiar hysterics and attention-seekers, think it was a good idea to invade Iraq in 2003, which has caused the lives of well over one million people?
Who now thinks it was a good idea for British to go to war in August 1914, a war that cost the lives of 16 million people?
Who now thinks it was a good idea to overthrow Gadhafi in Libya or Mubarak in Egypt or attempt to overthrow Assad in Syria?
Wouldn’t the western world now be better off if we focused on the huge loss of life that is caused by private motor cars, driven by incompetents and head-the-balls. In the United States over 30,000 people are killed every year in road accidents, 10 times the number of people killed in 9/11. More than 1.2 million are killed around the world every year in road deaths.
In Ireland, more than 5,000 people die prematurely because of the scale of inequality here – this was established by the report published by the Institute of Public Health (established under the Good Friday Agreement) in 2001, too horrendous a figure to get even acknowledged.
The usual hysterics and attention-seekers don’t bother with these banalities.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Poor sleeping on the streets but £50,000 spent on a wedding cake.
Markle’s dress cost more than fire-proof cladding would’ve for Grenfell, but the latter was somehow “too expensive”.
@eastsmer:
So in a country as large a Britain it’s not possible to do two things at the same time?
I know it pi**es off the Republicans among us but the fact is the vast majority of British people would want the fire proof cladding AND the dress to be bought.
@P.J. Nolan:
But two things did not happen at the same time.
@eastsmer:
That’s correct and the reason for that is what this enquiry is all about. My point is your statement is whataboutery of the finest order, one decision had nothing to do with the other.
@P.J. Nolan: “whataboutery” – tell that to the relatives
@P.J. Nolan: the man was making a valid point but of course whataboutery strikes again
@eastsmer: Ridiculous comparison and in reality the Royal family cost their country a lot less than they make for it. As for the wedding I’d imagine what the media paid to cover it more than paid for the event not to mention the influx of tourists for it.
@eastsmer: and your point is?
@eastsmer: the fire happened before the wedding there is no connection between these events, the Royal family have nothing to do with fire safety last time I looked, its the failure of a number of separate organisations. Your comment is just plain stupid.
@eastsmer: Correct. but don’t upset the flagwavers. they just love to be put in their place. it gives them purpose.
Awful just awful. Think of the fear the poor people went through.
I was in Manchester the day before the wedding. Not the slightest interest in it that i could see.
A completely valid and very pertinent comparison of the inequality in the lives of the super rich and the great mass of those who must struggle every day.
Not one perpetrator of the deaths in Grenfell tower has been arrested or charged. Not one.
@PV Nevin: Thank you PV Nevin – that is the comparison that I was trying to make.
I don’t wish to downgrade their ‘royal’ family if that is what floats their boats, however surely priorities can be shifted towards the less well off.
@eastsmer: i agree completely with your comparison. Was it not the arrogance of Kensington council, the regulators, the constructiton company and the materials company towards the poor that led to the massacre?
With regard to the monarchy, I believe the relentless propaganda of the media promotes a lie that there is not mass hatred for all the rich, including the royalty.
@PV Nevin: ___ Nothing’s changed as far as the super rich and the mere mortals are concerned. Basically, people still get what they’re given, usually by people who would never dream of living in those places.
@PV Nevin: Isn’t that why they’re having an inquiry ?
@PV Nevin: the investigation is not over yet so how can anyone be arrested or charged?
Our largest fire tragedy was a single storey nightclub.. The caravans in carrickmines were pretty far from high rise..
30 apt in 16, storey ballymun tower were destroyed with no injury..
It’s standards, vigilance and care that save lives..
And they want to build high rise in Dublin.
@Cranky: Yeah let’s not build any high rise anywhere else now because one went on fire.
@Cranky: whats that got to do with it?
Eco green energy saving insulation is actively encouraged, and you can get grants for installing it ..in reality it is flamable cladding ,
Next time you pass a building being coated in foam blocks look at the ground, pick up a piece of foam (litter will be all over the site) then do your own fire test.. you don’t need a Phd in physics..
Then wonder why we have fire regulations, and fire officers..
I hope they knock the place down and trun it into a monument to all those poor souls.
have your say