Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

PA Wire/PA Images

Children online 'Is 13 the appropriate age for digital consent?'

The increase in technology being given at Christmas means it’s important to ensure the Internet is a safe place for kids, writes Avril Ronan.

MORE THAN EIGHT out of ten parents bought a technology-related gift for their child this year, with the most popular buys being tablets, video games and smartphones. Whether it’s smartphones or toys with interactive apps though, this year’s top Christmas presents all connect to the Internet.

Like all parents, I worry all the time about my kids and yet, while the Internet has many risks and dangers, I want my kids to be online. I want them to be respectful and enjoy it, but I also want them to be safe and responsible when they are using it.

As an online safety educator, I welcome the proposed changes to the digital age of consent and the public consultation process for one reason: it is shining a spotlight on being online.

Legislating for digital consent

The proposed change to the Digital Age of Consent legislation means that each EU country must set the age of digital consent for children somewhere between 13 and 16 years of age.

In Ireland the digital age of consent is currently set at 13 (it’s when a child can avail of Internet services) but we can decide to change this age upwards as far as 16. This change applies to any Internet service that uses personal data of minors so covers all social networks, gaming, email and apps.

Without evidence-based research that recommends what the appropriate age for digital consent should be, changing the age right now is a numerical choice. Whether the age is changed or remains at 13 the only real approach and solution to this debate is online safety education.

As a small nation with so many of the world’s leading technology companies based locally, there is a real opportunity for Ireland to set standards ensuring that children of all ages can use and enjoy the Internet in a fun, safe and responsible way.

Yes, the Government must hold Internet services accountable for upholding the law. And yes, every Internet service has a duty of care, not just to abide by the digital age of consent but they must go above and beyond that. They must provide accessible and easily understood information about their service, its safety, privacy and use (including data storage and use).

Safeguarding must begin at home

Technology stock PA Archive / PA Images PA Archive / PA Images / PA Images

The responsibility of safeguarding our children online begins at home. We as parents and guardians are the first to place a device in the hands of our children so we have to educate ourselves to enable us to support, guide and protect our children online.

Here are some realities to consider. All sorts of data can be collected by an Internet service about your child, including name, age, DOB, address, current location, photos, chat history, fingerprints, voice recognition and physical attributes. No service forces you or your child to use their service so we need to do our homework first before engaging with anything new.

According to French privacy laws, parents posting images of their children online could face a fine of up to €45,000 for breaching their child’s privacy or endangering their security online. And a recent ParentZone survey in the UK found that parents post an average of 1500 images of their children online before their child reaches the age of 5. That’s about 25 images a month.

Do parents have the right to post images of their children online? Young people take their online reputation very seriously and this is a topic for discussion at all ages, not just among the young.

Parents unaware of the minimum age to be on social networks

Children under 13 are already online. They are faking their age to gain access to services that they want to use. This is a fact. So much more needs to be done by service providers everywhere to tackle this issue of underage use.

Online age verification solutions are being developed around the world, yet I struggle to see how they can be 100% effective. Aside from the cost of implementing this across the Internet, how would it be enforced?

Kids are smart. They will outwit any system

Young people are creators of technology and we already have inspiring young Irish entrepreneurs. We want our kids to be smart and savvy online so there is a simpler more cost effective way of empowering our youth to be great online, and that is through education.

I believe that from a young age, children should be permitted to be online. We need comfort in knowing that when we as parents are not around, that children will be in a better position to make responsible decisions on their own or at least feel comfortable talking. Growing up with your child online means that you start off with parental controls from a young age, educating them about being safe online. Your role as a parent slowly evolves as your child matures, earning them more responsibility online.

At the end of the day, while laws must abide to protect the rights of a child, neither restrictions, controls, verification processes nor algorithms will replace the parent and teacher in the important role of education. There is no magic app to tackle this, it comes down to parenting, education and honest conversations.

Avril Ronan is a pro-tech parent of two small children. She worries about her kids all the time and yet when it comes to being online, Avril is passionate about ensuring that we take a balanced view of the Internet and all things tech. In her role as Global Programme Manager for Trend Micro, Avril is responsible for Trend Micro’s Internet Safety for Kids and Families Programme (ISKF) which has reached over 100,000 parents, educators and students across Ireland over the past 5 years.

5% of children are in everyday contact with a stranger online>

Concern over new smart toys that can ‘spy’ on children>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 29 comments
Close
29 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute in_zane_burger
    Favourite in_zane_burger
    Report
    Apr 2nd 2014, 3:06 PM

    Can I have my money back now

    32
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute padser123
    Favourite padser123
    Report
    Apr 2nd 2014, 3:33 PM

    It’s like’…..burning your furniture – to keep warm!

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Roche
    Favourite Paul Roche
    Report
    Apr 2nd 2014, 4:52 PM

    Why are PwC saying this instead of IBRC and NAMA?

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Philip
    Favourite Philip
    Report
    Apr 2nd 2014, 5:20 PM

    As property prices start to rise nama , ibrc start to dump property

    Can someone explain why?

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dara O'Brien
    Favourite Dara O'Brien
    Report
    Apr 2nd 2014, 5:56 PM

    Dumping loans philip, not property. They’re Dumping the loans as they’re non-performing and want to get them off the balance sheet.

    If they had the patience, they’d put arrangements in place to allow the properties to return to positive equity and then seek a sale, this recouping more of the tax payers money.

    Unfortunately, they’ll sell the loans for a discount and allow the new purchasers to do this and net a tidy profit.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Garry Coll
    Favourite Garry Coll
    Report
    Apr 2nd 2014, 5:02 PM

    The article outlines that IBRC (IBROKE would probably be a better name) will offload € 15 billion in loans.
    Yet the linked article tells us that IBROKE have already offloaded 90% of its loanbook, € 19.8 billion out of € 21.7 billion leaving just € 1.9 billion on hand.
    This can only mean, if the previous article is correct, that it is NAMA that is offloading the majority of the loans.
    Why the subterfuge?
    Why make people think that this is some kind of joint enterprise when it is NAMA that is leading the charge?
    Have the shiny suit brigade from the canal something to hide?
    Given their obsession with secrecy it would not surprise me if they have, perhaps selling the loans to some preferred customer with an inside track at a serious discount.
    The way things go it will all be wrapped up before we know anything, plus ça change.

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Irish Revolution
    Favourite Irish Revolution
    Report
    Apr 2nd 2014, 2:58 PM

    Who in their right mind would buy this junk?

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Padraig McHale
    Favourite Padraig McHale
    Report
    Apr 2nd 2014, 3:01 PM

    It might only be worth 30% of face value but if you buy it for 20% it’s a good deal. For the buyer anyway.

    32
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tony
    Favourite Tony
    Report
    Apr 2nd 2014, 3:06 PM

    @ Irish Revolution

    The Banks?

    14
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Deirdre McDonnell
    Favourite Deirdre McDonnell
    Report
    Apr 3rd 2014, 2:42 AM

    Hedge funds bought it. They will now sell off all the ghost estates etc at a lower price so people that have houses for sale at the min will eventually have to sell for half or take them off the market.
    Fab house here in drogheda asking price €325. Hilarious. You could now nearly get a house for that on raglan road or ailsbury road!! So that house is realistically worth less than €150 really.
    People and notions ha

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Vanessa Doyle
    Favourite Vanessa Doyle
    Report
    Apr 2nd 2014, 7:04 PM

    What about Bank of Scotland selling on my mortgage & others in their Irish portfolio to a company called Tanager Ltd.
    I’m in a tizzy all day because I don’t know what it means for us.

    3
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds