Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Updated: 21.00
ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER Benjamin Netanyahu says he favours a pardon for an Israeli soldier convicted of manslaughter for shooting dead a Palestinian assailant as he lay wounded.
Elor Azaria had been on trial in a military court since May, with right-wing politicians defending him despite top army brass harshly condemning his actions.
“This has been a hard and painful day for us all. first and foremost for Elor and his family,” Netanyahu wrote on his Facebook page.
“I support giving a pardon to Elor Azaria,” he added.
Judge Colonel Maya Heller said that there had been no reason for Azaria to open fire since the Palestinian was posing no threat.
“His motive for shooting was that he felt the terrorist deserved to die,” she said.
The 24 March shooting in the occupied West Bank city of Hebron was caught on video and spread widely online.
It prompted intense political debate, with Netanyahu making waves when he called Azaria’s father to express his sympathy.
Israeli president Reuven Rivlin’s office issued a statement shortly after today’s court ruling, advising that any talk of a pardon was premature.
It said that an application could only be made by Azaria himself, his lawyer or close relatives, and then only after the judicial process had run its course.
Sentencing is expected at a later date for the 20-year-old French-Israeli sergeant. He faces up to 20 years in prison and can appeal.
“In the event that a pardon should be requested, it will be considered by the president in accordance with standard practices and after recommendations from the relevant authorities,” the presidential statement said.
Azaria’s demeanour drastically changed as the judge read the verdict.
Dressed in a green army uniform, he had entered the courtroom smiling, with family members and supporters applauding him.
But he and his family later looked shaken as the judge spoke, with his mother and father huddling together.
After the verdict, his mother yelled:
You should be ashamed of yourselves.
Azaria was 19 at the time of the killing in March 2016 in the city of Hebron in the occupied West Bank.
Protests outside
In a sign of the tensions surrounding the case, dozens of protesters scuffled with police as they gathered outside Israel’s military headquarters in Tel Aviv, where the verdict was announced.
They held a sign that read: “People of Israel do not abandon a soldier in the battlefield”.
Before he became Israeli defence minister in May, Avigdor Lieberman was among those showing strong support for Azaria, including attending one of his court appearances.
He has since backed away from his earlier stance and, immediately after today’s verdict, said he disagreed with the decision but that it must be respected.
“I call on politicians to stop attacking the security establishment and the army and its chief of staff,” he said.
Others however, from what is seen as the most right-wing government in Israeli history, maintained their hardline position.
“He’s our son, our child,” Culture Minister Miri Regev told Israeli television, saying Azaria should not have faced a criminal trial.
The case burst into public view when a video of the March shooting emerged and spread widely online.
The video showed Abdul Fatah al-Sharif, 21, lying on the ground, shot along with another man after stabbing and moderately wounding a soldier minutes earlier, according to the army.
Azaria then shoots him again in the head without any apparent provocation.
His lawyers argued the soldier may have thought the Palestinian was wearing explosives, but others said he had already been checked for a suicide belt and no one in the video appears to be acting with caution toward him.
Polarised public
Military chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot has spoken out against the politicisation of the case, warning it could badly harm the army.
He said rules on when to open fire must be followed.
The case galvanised the Israeli public, and television and radio stations interrupted their broadcasts to carry live coverage of the verdict.
It had been portrayed by some as a test of whether Israel’s military could prosecute one of its own, though many Palestinians dismissed it, arguing Azaria was only taken to trial because of the video.
The military has said it began investigating before the release of the video, filmed by a Palestinian volunteer for Israeli rights group B’Tselem.
The shooting came against the backdrop of a wave of Palestinian knife, gun and car-ramming attacks that erupted in October 2015.
Israeli security forces have been accused of excessive force in certain other cases as well, though authorities say officers act appropriately to protect themselves and civilians.
Most of the attacks were by lone-wolf assailants, many of them young people, including teenagers. Israel’s military has said it believes a significant number of them were essentially on suicide missions.
The violence has greatly subsided in recent months.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Hi everyone, I’ve never posted a comment before as I like to read them but I would ask that a little respect for her as I knew her and her family. Her death was sudden and she was a lovely woman, so please be mindful of that when posting. Thank you
Hi everybody I’m just asking for a little bit of respect as I know the woman and her family, so please be mindful of that when you make a comment. She was a lovely woman and her death was sudden. Thank you
Do they put the remains back out or what? This is very interesting
@Ísla Carabine:
Wonder if they’re superstitious?
@Glascott Richard Symes: Surely it would be better to cremate first, then scatter the ashes on the water so that this situation doesn’t arise. What if the same thing happens again.
@Glascott Richard Symes: please tell me you’re joking.
I honestly didn’t know it was even an option here. Terrible for the family right now of course but it’s certainly sounds much more pleasant than being buried
@Avina Laaf: generally I’m not but I would be if this happened!
@Glascott Richard Symes: hang on! The coffin goes out to sea as well?!
Very disappointed with the comments. This women was an Irish citizen and obviously it was a wish to be buried at sea. It’s unfortunate that her remains were washed ashore, this must be heartbreaking for the family to have to deal with. My condolences to the family and friends.
@Donna: I agree Donna. Must be quite disturbing for the family after what happened :(
The coffin you use must be made of solid softwood and must not contain any plastic, lead, copper or zinc. It must have:
between 40 and 50 50mm (2 inch) holes drilled throughout
corners butt-jointed and strengthened with mild steel right angle brackets screwed internally, or substantial wooden bracing struts 50 x 38mm
about 200kg of iron, steel or concrete clamped to the base of the coffin with brackets of 10mm mild steel bar, or blocks of weak concrete mix
weight distributed evenly to prevent the coffin from turning to the vertical
2 long mild steel bands running from the top to the bottom of the coffin
several mild steel bands across the coffin at about 30cm intervals along its length
The coffin and any inner box or liner must be made from natural, non-toxic and biodegradable materials. They must both be able to withstand any impact and be able to carry the body quickly to the seabed.
The only time I have heard of anything similar to this was when some fishermen reckoned that a beam trawler had smashed up a coffin and let the remains up into the current/tide. It may also explain this. Beamers wreck the sea bed.
There are two issues here, first it must be incredibly upsetting and distressing for the family and all who know this woman and anyone would feel for them. Second issue is an environmental one and there are very good reasons why as a species we don’t just bury bodies where we feel like it. Imagine if the body was only a few weeks dead and few kids found it? Insane practise.
Can’t have bodies resurfacing and washing up because bodies are allowed to be buried at sea ,with regulations to protect the environment . You should only be buried at sea as a last resort and not as a choice
have your say