Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The Sydney Rose on the Rose of Tralee last August. RTÉ

Complaints around 8th Amendment and 'rubbishing Mass' on Rose of Tralee rejected

The BAI rejected seven complaints to do with last year’s Rose of Tralee

FIVE COMPLAINTS AROUND a Rose of Tralee contestant insulting Irish Mass have been rejected by the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland.

Two complaints around a separate contestant expressing her support for a referendum to be held on the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution were also rejected.

During last August’s Rose of Tralee the North Carolina Rose gave her views on Irish Mass.

Three complainants took issue with her description of mass during her interview segment and the conversation that followed with the presenter Dáithí Ó Sé.

In the segment, the Rose - Maigan Kennedy – describes her experience as a North American Protestant attending a Roman Catholic mass.

She lightheartedly describes mass as “like a gym, and at the end the priest gives you a biscuit”. Ó Sé then questions – “was it gluten-free?”

Five complainants took issue with this description of Mass, claiming that it was insulting to the Catholic religion.

One complainant stated that the Rose was “allowed to ridicule, make fun of and generally rubbish the Irish Roman Catholic Mass”.

Another said that referring to the Eucharistic Host as a biscuit “should not have happened” and that it was “inexcusable”.

Another said the segment was an “abuse of free speech” and an “insult to Irish Catholics who believe in God’s teachings”.

In its ruling, the BAI found that the segment was in keeping with the “style of the programme” and that the Rose’s comments were “irreverent and humourous”.

The BAI found that while people may have been offended, the Rose’s comments were not:

of a nature that they would cause widespread offence and could be considered to stigmatise, support or condone discrimination against people on the basis of their religion.

The Eighth Amendment

Two complaints were also rejected by the BAI to do with a separate interview segment with the Sydney Rose the previous night.

In this case, the Sydney Rose – Brianna Parkins – made comments around a referendum being held on the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution.

In her interview segment, Parkins said:

I think it’s time we give women a say on their own reproductive rights and I would love to see a referendum on the 8th coming up soon.

The comments sparked a lot of debate at the time, with Parkins winning praise from some quarters, but also being criticised from festival judges.

In its ruling, the BAI found that the comments were Parkins’ “personal opinion made in the context of a light entertainment interview whose focus was on her character and her interests”.

The Committee also found in its ruling that the presenter (Ó Sé) ”did not specifically elicit her views on the topic of Ireland’s abortion laws nor did he pursue this topic further”.

Read: Woman subjected to ‘grossly offensive comments’ on fatal foetal abnormality on 98FM show

Read: Today FM team given stern talking to about ‘weak c**k’ comment

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
35 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David
    Favourite David
    Report
    Oct 18th 2022, 8:33 PM

    When cases are settled on the steps of the court house, the real winners are the legal profession.
    I hope this system is an improvement and people get help when they need it, not years down the line when their lives are completely altered

    64
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Epgenetics29 Declan Christy
    Favourite Epgenetics29 Declan Christy
    Report
    Oct 18th 2022, 8:06 PM
    50
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David
    Favourite David
    Report
    Oct 18th 2022, 8:40 PM

    @Epgenetics29 Declan Christy: 60 grand might seem like a lot but over a lifetime it isn’t much. Personally if I had a choice between permanent damage to a hand or the money I’d rather have my body intact. I’d imagine most people would think the same

    104
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ian James Burgess
    Favourite Ian James Burgess
    Report
    Oct 18th 2022, 8:44 PM

    @Epgenetics29 Declan Christy: the judge must have had a lot of parking tickets

    21
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Clancy
    Favourite Paul Clancy
    Report
    Oct 18th 2022, 8:47 PM

    @Epgenetics29 Declan Christy: you didn’t read it. Not a broken finger. “suffers a permanent deformity” and that after 2 surgeries. But you’re faux rage comment is much cooler.

    87
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mark Sheehan
    Favourite Mark Sheehan
    Report
    Oct 18th 2022, 10:37 PM

    @Epgenetics29 Declan Christy: 60k for a permanent injury, plenty of Joe soaps getting a he’ll of a lot more for a lot less.

    28
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mark Dawson
    Favourite Mark Dawson
    Report
    Oct 22nd 2022, 6:06 AM

    You sign up to do a job that carries certain amount of risk and how can the department of justice or the state be negligible if then you are assaulted in the course of your work that you signed up for and are aware of the risks ..my understanding of civil law is that someone had to be proved to be negligible to win a injury claim

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds