We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
THE JUDGE PRESIDING over the new Disclosures Tribunal has said that any lie told to the inquiry will be a ‘waste of what ordinary men and women have paid for’.
Justice Peter Charleton, giving his opening statement, noted that the investigation is a drain on the resources of the Irish people, saying the public wants his work to be completed expediently.
Mentioning the length of previous inquiries, he said he did not see any reason why parallel legal challenges (in the High Court) would be taken. “If a person has a problem, that person should first of all apply to the tribunal in a genuine manner.”
The Supreme Court judge said that he has no “preconceived notions” about who is a hero and who is a villain.
He called upon people with information pertinent to the probe into how whistleblowers have been treated by An Garda Síochána to provide written statements to the Tribunal solicitor Elizabeth Mullen.
‘Active, thought-through malice’
Charleton said the Tribunal will look at how top officials in An Garda Síochána react when concerns are raised by whistleblowers:
The central concern is whether such reaction has, possibly, and this is now unknown, not only been one of distate, but of active and thought-through malice whereby media briefings take place against individuals who rock the boat.
As if that were not enough, there is an additional question as to whether those who air concerns about poor policing may also be targeted and attacked as to their family life and as to their adherence to basic standards of human decency.
The first module will look at the response of Garda Commission Nóirín O’Sullivan, former Commissioner Martin Callinan and others at the highest command level to disclosures made by Sergeant Maurice McCabe and, in particular, the manner in which his character may possibly have been “undermined by calumny or detraction”.
Submissions will be heard, he explained, on whether there is privilege against disclosing instructions given by a client to their lawyer as to what is to be pursued in cross-examination. This relates to the O’Higgins Commission into allegations of garda malpractice in Bailieboro, Co Cavan, during which McCabe claims the Commissioner directed her counsel to discredit him.
Charleton said the tribunal was currently in the middle of reading the entire transcript of the Commission.
‘Naked deceit’
In relation to dealings with the media, the judge said the central witness will be Superintendent David Taylor, former head of the garda press office, who claims he was told to brief the media negatively that the whistleblower was motivated by malice and revenge.
The tribunal will also examine broadcasts on RTÉ television on 9 May 2016 purporting to be a leaked account of the unpublished O’Higgins Commission report and whether the Commissioner used briefing material prepared at Garda Headquarters to influence these broadcasts.
Charleton said he wants to know if the media was “used as an instrument for the dissemination of lies”. He also questioned whether privilege applies when the media is used as a tool of “naked deceit”.
The judge has asked anyone with knowledge of the matters in the terms of reference to send a detailed written statement to Elizabeth Mullan, a solicitor to the tribunal, at Dublin Castle, Dublin D02 Y337. Statements should be submitted by close of business on 13 March 2017. Further information can be found on the tribunal’s website.
With reporting by Sinéad O’Carroll
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
What an awful situation in a truly failed country.
Have you been there?
No different to the appalling atrocities that are carried out in Syria under our noses by Western backed “moderate” rebels.
Frank, can you not just say that it’s bad?
Or should I refer to you as abbilitive?
Declan Noonan both are bad but I must admit that the one that I mentioned is far more appalling than the other because it has been carried out in the name of democracy by a so called civilized nation.
Nobody has to go there to know what it’s like! Yes of course there are good parts like anywhere else. Slowly the cartels will take over them too! It’s people like you that know nothing about Mexico and it’s horrific violence.
Go google Mexican drug cartel images and come back here!! The tourist areas are safe the rest isn’t! When the cops are part of the problem what hope do they have prey tell.
I would not go to Mexico, even as a corpse….
Outside of the gated areas, it’s a cesspit of a country.
Probably not,but he is able to read
Humanity at its most depraved
Mexico is mental.
Homicide rate is something like 1 in 5000. In ireland that would be close to 1000 people a year.
Tragic. Young innocent aspiring students lives savagely taken away by sick, evil creatures
That’s what’s truly scary. Those were just students. The majority of killings are drug related. This wasn’t. Very strange for Mexico. Nothing shocks me over there but that really does. These new bodies will be drug related. The note says it all. The poor students were really shocking and very sad. The rest,they just kill each other over drugs and areas. Nothing new really.
We must keep these people out of Europe. All non EU immigration must be severely curtailed.
There is no z in organised. Petty and off topic i know but im not sure whats worse journalists who cant proof read or journalists who turn the country location to ireland.
have your say