Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
AMERICAN ACTRESS JANE Fonda revealed she has been raped and was sexually abused as a child, in an interview with British magazine The Edit.
“I’ve been raped, I’ve been sexually abused as a child and I’ve been fired because I wouldn’t sleep with my boss, and I always thought it was my fault,” the 79-year-old said.
The two-time Oscar winner, who is known for her political activism, made the comments in an interview marking International Women’s Day on 8 March.
“I know young girls who’ve been raped and didn’t even know it was rape. They think, ‘It must have been because I said ‘no’ the wrong way’,” she said.
One of the great things the women’s movement has done is to make us realise that (rape and abuse is) not our fault. We were violated and it’s not right.
The magazine, which is owned by the online luxury shopping platform Net-A-Porter, did not mention who was responsible for the abuse.
Fonda was interviewed by fellow Oscar winner and activist Brie Larson.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Not cracks but the grand canyon
“I think it’s probably a lack of political will or lack of urgency on the issue and associated resources to match that,”
Just like health and housing no politician’s kids at risk. Ah but sure the country is flying.
This should be the first thing every country should solve. Who doesn’t understand that has no clue or doesn’t care about future generations.Abusive behavior creates new abusers. I was against death penalty, but changed my mind. pedos and traffickers should get it.
But Irish liberals scream racist at any suggestion of screening and our politicians back down out of fear of the hysterics that surround theses issues. The liberals don’t care about genuine victims, only about those who take offence.
@Morning Gus: nonsense
And yet whenever there’s an article about a missing teenager here, there are often many comments accusing the missing child of “playing stupid Facebook games” or just looking for attention without any knowledge of their backgrounds or situation. I especially worry about the kids where the only photo available seems to be an ID photo of some sort. I often wonder why there isn’t any recent pictures of them, smiling, at a family occasion or with their friends. Don’t they have anyone who cares enough about them to take these kind of photos? Nobody who wants to make memories with them they can keep forever? These are the kids that are vulnerable to these s€um because nobody cares about them. These abusers are often the first time they’ve been ‘cared’ about.
How many children have been placed by Tusla in foster homes where abuse has happened and were left in that home. I would guess it’s happening left right and centre and it will continue because nobody is ever held accountable in that agency for anything it seems.
@Lyndsay Rehn:
That is another serious problem. Tusla is not fit for purpose…nor were the childcare services before it. How hard could it be to organise the welfare of vulnerable kids without destroying them?
The whole issue of child trafficking has been hijacked by organisations that are constantly deriving their relevance from sex work abolitionism. On the surface, when it comes to protecting children there shouldn’t be much harm that mentality could do, but it is more complicated than that.
They are deeply committed (and have, in turn committed a portion of our laws) to an ideology that focusses on sex as a threat to the exclusion of all other considerations. This distorts everything they do, in terms of research and solutions, too far from reality to be harmless, let alone of any real use to real victims.
In the real world, by the time a child of being subjected to unwanted sex that is unlikely to be the only threat he lives under and is damaged by, let alone the worst one. To help such a child you have to acknowledge, and rescue him from ALL the things that threaten him, not just the sexual threats that support a specific ideology, because if you are not looking at the whole picture and are ready to ignore, dismiss, or even just downplay non-sexual threats to him and his survival his survival instinct will drive him away from you and deeper into sexual exploitation, because that is less dangerous to him than you are.
have your say