Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
WIKILEAKS HAS PUBLISHED thousands of documents purportedly taken from the Central Intelligence Agency’s Center for Cyber Intelligence.
The dramatic release appears to provide an eye-opening look at the intimate details of the USA’s cyber espionage toolkit.
The dump of more than 8,000 documents could not immediately be authenticated and the CIA declined to comment, but WikiLeaks has a long track record of releasing top secret government documents. Experts who’ve started to sift through the material said it appears legitimate — and that the release was almost certain to shake the CIA.
“There’s no question that there’s a fire drill going on right now,” Jake Williams, a security expert with Georgia-based Rendition Infosec, said. “It wouldn’t surprise me that there are people changing careers — and ending careers — as we speak.”
Bob Ayers, a retired US intelligence official currently working as a security analyst, agreed, saying the release was “real bad” for the agency.
If the authenticity of the dump is officially confirmed, it would represent yet another catastrophic breach for the US intelligence community at the hands of WikiLeaks and its allies, which have repeatedly humbled Washington with the mass release of classified material, including hundreds of thousands of documents from the State Department and the Pentagon.
Improvised surveillance devices
WikiLeaks, which had been dropping cryptic hints about the release for a month, said in a lengthy statement the CIA had “recently” lost control of a massive arsenal of CIA hacking tools as well as associated documentation. The radical transparency organisation said that “the archive appears to have been circulated among former US government hackers and contractors in an unauthorised manner” and that one of them “provided WikiLeaks with portions of the archive”.
Jonathan Liu, a spokesman for the CIA, said: “We do not comment on the authenticity or content of purported intelligence documents.”
Williams, who has experience dealing with government hackers, said the voluminous files’ extensive references to operation security meant they were almost certainly government-backed.
“I can’t fathom anyone fabricated that amount of operational security concern,” he said. “It rings true to me.”
The only people who are having that conversation are people who are engaging in nation-state-level hacking.
The documents cover a range of topics, including what appeared to be a discussion about how to compromise smart televisions and turn them into improvised surveillance devices.
WikiLeaks said the leaked data also included details on the agency’s efforts to subvert American software products and smartphones, including Apple’s iPhone, Google’s Android and Microsoft’s Windows.
A “substantial library” of digital espionage techniques borrowed from Russia and other countries is in the data as well, WikiLeaks said.
Ayers noted that WikiLeaks has promised to release more CIA documents, saying today’s publication is just “the first full part of the series”.
“The damage right now is relatively high-level,” he said. “(But) the potential for really detailed damage will come in the following releases.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Hindsight should be this government’s manifesto.
@Will Roche: “Say the line, Bart!” “Lessons were learned.” “Yaaaayyyyyy!”
@JusticeForJoe: I am waiting for them to say, “Sure we are not as bad as the lads next door”
‘said that there was no evidence that they were bought for a celebration for that evening’
Would that picture not stands as evidence?
You and your departments seem to make a lot of mistakes if the job is to big for you resign. It seem you are not running your departments properly and you are only interested in what your E. U. masters to you
Yes you should’ve raised the issue with the Secretary General instead of raising glasses of bubbly
comments section must of been left open by mistake (:(:
Another great witch hunt about to begin fascinating that was not one gathering of journalists anywhere in Ireland during lockdown
So a wonderful virtuous and honourable industry
Or ………..Omerta as was the case with Irelands most famous cocaine snorting DJ
@Jerry Slattery: Holding people in positions of power and influence for valid and proven reasons is not a witch hunt. By your photo I assume you are old enough to remember the days in which Irish politicians routinely and blatantly paraded their indifference and even indignation to being held to account for their own actions (often corrupt). Coveney is no f-o-o-l and he knows this should have been dealt with differently.
@David A. Murray: Holding to account people……
@Jerry Slattery: Oh, won’t somebody please think of the witches! You seem to think the people who make our laws should be free to decide which of those laws they have to obey, themselves. Have I got that right?
Coveney should have become a whistle-blower…lol
These tribunals over nonsense ‘storm-in-a-teacup’ allegations are such a waste of tax payer money and government time when there is much more pressing business like the rising cost of living and housing etc. Seems like when one “scandal” dries up another one rears its head.. I’m all for accountability and standards in public office, but people need to see the big picture and get over it.. Have these public accounts or oireachtas committee appearances or internal investigations ever amounted to anything other than a headline that just fades over time?
have your say