Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE FATE OF Fox News presenter Bill O’Reilly has been confirmed, with the embattled host shown the door at the US TV network.
Fox News’s parent company 21st Century Fox released a short statement this evening to indicate O’Reilly’s departure.
It said: “After a thorough and careful review of the allegations, the company and Bill O’Reilly have agreed that Bill O’Reilly will not be returning to the Fox News Channel.”
Although not explicitly stating that O’Reilly was pushed out, Fox News had been under pressure following the allegations against the presenter, where a woman said that her career had been slowed when she spurned O’Reilly’s advances.
Dozens of advertisers have dropped The O’Reilly Factor following reports of harassment settlements paid to other women.
The New York Times reported on 2 April that five women had been paid a total of $13 million to keep quiet about unpleasant encounters with O’Reilly, who has denied any wrongdoing.
O’Reilly had previously been the most-watched cable news anchor in the US, but had been placed on leave after the most recent allegations surfaced.
The Wall Street Journal — a newspaper owned by the same Murdoch family that owns Fox News Channel — reported late yesterday that Fox executives were “preparing to cut ties” with O’Reilly.
O’Reilly had been scheduled to return from a holiday next Monday. He was photographed in Rome shaking Pope Francis’ hand on today.
It marks a stunning end to a near perfect marriage between a pugnacious personality and the network. For two decades O’Reilly has ruled the “no spin zone” with cable news’ most popular show, and his ratings had never been higher.
With reporting from AP.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
NIMBYs incoming
@Pól Ó’hAodha: :) so far so good
Plans look good and what a central location to live with everything on your doorstep, good luck to the lucky tenants that will live in them private or council owned
Brilliant news
It’s a sad state of affairs when we need to go for cabinet approval to build some apartments.
@Anthony Horan: You mean using *public* land to enrich private landlords? Yeah, that definitely shouldn’t be allowed. Ever.
They look like they’ll make decent barracks for the Russians when they take over. Timing is off tho they won’t be ready by then.
Great news
They were all social housing and that was what was wanted again, now the vultures can swoop in.
@Gary Kearney: and the people in social housing get a free house, it’s a win win
@Gary Kearney: I take it you never saw the place when it was occupied.
have your say