Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File Photo Andrii Vodolazhskyi via Shutterstock

Scientists fix disease genes in human embryos for the first time

Just over 72% of the embryos ended up being free of a heart disease-causing mutation.

US SCIENTISTS HAVE repaired a disease-causing mutation in the DNA of early-stage human embryos, taking a step closer to engineering babies free of inherited disorders.

The team’s successful use of the CRISPR “gene editing” tool in viable embryos was hailed as a technical feat by outside experts, who called at the same time for deeper debate on the ethics of altering human DNA.

The lab-created, edited embryos were not allowed to develop beyond a few days when they comprised a handful of cells.

Just over 72% of the embryos – 42 out of 58 – ended up being free of a heart disease-causing mutation carried in the DNA of the sperm used to create them, a team reported in the journal Nature.

This was an improvement on the 50% odds for embryos that result naturally from a couple in which one partner carries the coding error.

With further improvement, said study co-author Paula Amato of the Oregon Health & Science University, the method “can potentially be used to prevent transmission of genetic disease to future generations.”

The alteration itself is heritable, meaning that the children and grandchildren of a person born with edited DNA will be safe from the same genetic disease.

Further research is needed to determine the technique’s safety, and to boost its accuracy to as close to 100% as possible before it can be used to create embryos meant to develop into healthy babies.

Amato’s colleague Shoukhrat Mitalipov said:

I am quite sure that there are tools that we could use to improve… this repair so that we could achieve say 90% to maybe 100% efficiency, then I would say we would be ready to move to clinical trials.

Gene editing is controversial because it evokes a future in which humans can order “designer” babies with specific features – blonde hair, athleticism, perhaps even intelligence.

But there is also the prospect of avoiding heritable, genetic diseases that can handicap or kill.

The team studied a gene mutation which causes hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, a hereditary disease of the heart muscle which can translate into sudden heart failure and death, notably in athletes.

 No longer fantasy

It is a type of disorder, like Huntington’s Disease, that requires an abnormal gene from just one parent.

The researchers used sperm from a donor carrying the mutation, and eggs from healthy women.

They injected the CRISPR-Cas9 editing tool into the eggs at the same time as the sperm — a major departure from what other teams have done.

The researchers found that 72.4% of the embryos, not 50% as would have been expected, were free of the errant gene.

Nor were there unintended mutations in other parts of the genome.

In previous CRISPR studies in China, the gene-editing tool was added only after fertilisation.

Those teams had problems with “mosaicism”, which occurs when some cells in an embryo are corrected, and some not.

In the new study, just one embryo turned out a mosaic.

“We definitely want to replicate this study with other mutations and other donors,” said Amato.

CRISPR is a revolutionary gene-editing technique which allows scientists to insert, remove and correct DNA within a cell with pinpoint precision.

For Peter Braude, a reproductive health expert from King’s College London, the study showed that “germline genome editing has moved from future fantasy to the world of possibility.”

The debate about using it in practice, he added, “needs to run to catch up.”

“Perhaps the biggest question, and probably the one that will be debated the most, is whether we should be physically altering the genes of an IVF (lab-created) embryo at all,” added Darren Griffin of the University of Kent.

Equally, the debate on how morally acceptable it is not to act when we have the technology to prevent these life-threatening diseases must also come into play.

Currently, the only way to avoid heritable disease in assisted reproduction is to fertilise eggs in the lab, analyse the DNA of the resulting embryos, and eliminate those containing errors.

The new CRISPR technique could be used to increase the number of viable embryos for implantation, said the team, thus reducing the number of eggs that have to be invasively harvested.

In 2015, a UN bioethics committee called for a stop to human embryo gene editing for fears it could be used to modify the human race.

Last year, Britain granted scientists permission to edit embryo DNA in research on the causes of infertility and miscarriages.

And in February this year, a US science advisory committee said such modification should be allowed in future to eliminate disease.

- © AFP, 2017

Read: Should Charlie Gard’s name have been made public?

More: The Mediterranean diet only has heart benefits for the well-off, says study

Author
View 20 comments
Close
20 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Shaun Gallagher
    Favourite Shaun Gallagher
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 10:54 AM

    Here we go again. Will soon have no arm left

    130
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tommy Roche
    Favourite Tommy Roche
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 11:36 AM

    @Shaun Gallagher: Wouldn’t sweat it, unless you feel you’re part of an at risk group ?

    63
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eoin Clancy
    Favourite Eoin Clancy
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 1:12 PM

    16,000 people in the whole wide world have a rash and it’s a health emergency. You couldn’t make it up.

    95
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Niamh Hayes
    Favourite Niamh Hayes
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 1:24 PM

    @Eoin Clancy: kids get really sick from it,not too big of a deal for adults

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ciarán O' Donoghue
    Favourite Ciarán O' Donoghue
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 3:18 PM

    @Niamh Hayes: Kids shouldn’t be getting monkeypox. Also, have they not changed the name of it yet?

    23
    See 6 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Diarmuid Hunt
    Favourite Diarmuid Hunt
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 4:11 PM

    @Ciarán O’ Donoghue: Why would the name change?

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fiona Fitzgerald
    Favourite Fiona Fitzgerald
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 5:08 PM

    @Eoin Clancy: While they’re out sick, presumably there’s a shortage of healthy staff, in fairness.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gavin Conran
    Favourite Gavin Conran
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 5:25 PM

    @Eoin Clancy: 16,000 becomes 32,000 quite quickly, thus addressing early is key. How is it a self certified journal.ie epidemiologist such as yourself missed that?

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eoin Clancy
    Favourite Eoin Clancy
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 7:07 PM

    @Gavin Conran: I didn’t know you needed a phd in epidemiology to make a comment. Making everyone scared doesn’t need a phd qualification does it? Did you specialise in fear at university?

    17
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eoin Clancy
    Favourite Eoin Clancy
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 7:08 PM

    @Fiona Fitzgerald: Huh?

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eoin Clancy
    Favourite Eoin Clancy
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 7:17 PM

    @Gavin Conran: just saw you’re fake Facebook account. Bot

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Margaret Deacon
    Favourite Margaret Deacon
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 11:43 AM

    How long does vaccine last, think I was given as a child

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Will
    Favourite Will
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 12:00 PM

    @Margaret Deacon: “How long does vaccine last”.

    Googled : ‘Smallpox vaccination provides full immunity for 3 to 5 years and decreasing immunity thereafter.’
    As opposed to the Covid ‘vaccine’ which may reduce your chances of serious illness

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute David Jordan
    Favourite David Jordan
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 12:02 PM

    @Margaret Deacon: Immunity may last a lifetime, these researchers found that an 88-year-old was likely still immune due to the vaccine he received as a child. Though other info online says the vaccine provides maximum immunity for 3 – 5 years, and after then immunity starts to decline.

    Taub, D.D., Ershler, W.B., Janowski, M., Artz, A., Key, M.L., McKelvey, J., Muller, D., Moss, B., Ferrucci, L., Duffey, P.L. and Longo, D.L., 2008. Immunity from smallpox vaccine persists for decades: a longitudinal study. The American journal of medicine, 121(12), pp.1058-1064.

    36
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute SquintEastwood
    Favourite SquintEastwood
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 12:13 PM

    @David Jordan: what science have we to follow this time ?
    which of those studies is going to be called misinformation and anyone you read it a antivax nutter

    38
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Clancy
    Favourite Paul Clancy
    Report
    Jul 25th 2022, 12:35 PM

    @David Jordan: I assume that’s vaccination for smallpox. From what I’ve read on some UK information sites as this is a smallpox vaccine that also works for MP it may not provide full immunity but rather lessens the symptoms.

    6
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds