Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Virginia Mayo/AP

Ryanair rapped over ‘sexist’ newspaper ads for cabin crew calendar

The Advertising Standards Agency upholds complaints over newspaper ads selling the airline’s underwear-themed calendar.

THE UK’S advertising standards watchdog has upheld over a dozen complaints about newspaper advertising for Ryanair’s annual charity calendar featuring female members of its cabin crew in their underwear.

The Advertising Standards Authority said advertisements published in the Guardian, the Daily Telegraph and the Independent – showing female stewardesses in their underwear, one of them carrying the caption ‘Red hot fares and crew!’ – were sexist and objectified women.

The ASA said that although the images were “not overtly sexual in content, the appearance, stance and gaze of the women, particular the one in ad (a) [The Guardian ad], who was shown pulling her pants slightly down, were likely to be seen as sexually suggestive”.

We also considered that most readers would interpret these images, in conjunction with the text “RED HOT FARES & CREW!!!” and the names of the women, as linking female cabin crew with sexually suggestive behaviour.

The authority recognised that while the women appearing in the advertisements had consented to do so, appearing in a national newspaper meant they were “likely to cause widespread offence”.

Ryanair had defended itself by saying the flight attendants who appeared in the adverts had already consented to do so, by virtue of their participation in the charity calendar.

It also said the ads were not sexist and had not objectified women.

The Guardian’s take on the story quotes a spokeswoman for its own publication, which said a “system breakdown” meant its ad had not been vetted before it appeared in print.

Read: Less than seven hours after Malev collapse, Ryanair announces new Budapest base

Gallery: Our alternative Ryanair calendar – 12 months of Mick

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
58 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Vocal Outrage
    Favourite Vocal Outrage
    Report
    Mar 10th 2015, 3:54 PM

    ‘..face severe disciplinary action…’, should be facing severe criminal charges more like

    47
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gordon Gekko
    Favourite Gordon Gekko
    Report
    Mar 10th 2015, 2:41 PM

    My money is on PETA being behind this.

    44
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute stephen
    Favourite stephen
    Report
    Mar 10th 2015, 3:33 PM

    You do know what PETA stands for?

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute alan irwin
    Favourite alan irwin
    Report
    Mar 10th 2015, 3:43 PM

    Can peta make you sick.

    5
    See 3 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gordon Gekko
    Favourite Gordon Gekko
    Report
    Mar 10th 2015, 3:50 PM

    Yes I do know what they stand for. They are an organisation of people that care about fluffing their own egos than animal rights.

    Check out an of the widely available documentation of PETA funding the extermination of healthy dogs that could have been rehomed.

    Also they are categorically against dog breeders and as such would rather see the breeding animals die so that no further puppies may be bred from them.

    PETA are filth.

    44
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute colm connolly
    Favourite colm connolly
    Report
    Mar 10th 2015, 4:57 PM

    Could not agree more peta are disgraceful bunch of aholes

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute SteoG
    Favourite SteoG
    Report
    Mar 10th 2015, 6:11 PM

    Nonsense! It is obvious you have read very biased articles on Peta. They do not hide what they do, they admit they destroy animals only when there is no other option. I am not going to get into a discussion on the matter there is plenty of answers on Petas website. Its strange that all the anti Peta material is financed by a large drinks company that own a number of sealife parks that Peta has exposed as cruel.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Sands
    Favourite Michael Sands
    Report
    Mar 10th 2015, 5:39 PM

    It is evil to kill anything like this, full stop.

    32
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds