Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
IRELAND HAS BACKED a UN treaty prohibiting nuclear weapons, despite objections to the treaty from Nato.
Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Coveney signed the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons during a ceremony at the UN in New York earlier today.
Backed by 112 countries, the treaty prohibits involved states from developing, testing, producing, manufacturing, possessing or stockpiling nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
The treaty was led by Ireland, Austria, Brazil, Mexico, Nigeria and South Africa, on the foot of years of talks between UN members and civil society groups.
“Ireland is proud to have played a leadership role.. in negotiating this ground-breaking treaty, which represents the successful outcome of the first multilateral disarmament negotiations in over 20 years,” Coveney said in New York today.
I am happy that today, finally, the international community is taking this important step in implementing the NPT’s disarmament commitments – there is no place for weapons of mass destruction in the 21st century.
In a statement today, the Department of Foreign Affairs said that nuclear disarmament has been a priority for Ireland from the outset of our membership of the UN.
It said that the content of the new treaty is ground-breaking due to its commitment to humanitarianism, disarmament education, and its recognition of survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings.
However, Nato members, which includes most EU countries, condemned the treaty.
In a statement issued shortly after today’s signing, Nato said:
Seeking to ban nuclear weapons through a treaty that will not engage any state actually possessing nuclear weapons will not be effective, will not reduce nuclear arsenals, and will neither enhance any country’s security, nor international peace and stability.
In a stark contrast to Ireland’s stance, Nato said that the ban treaty is at odds with the existing nonproliferation and disarmament architecture.
“The ban treaty, in our view, disregards the realities of the increasingly challenging international security environment,” Nato said.
“At a time when the world needs to remain united in the face of growing threats, in particular, the grave threat posed by North Korea’s nuclear programme, the treaty fails to take into account these urgent security challenges.”
Ireland is one of 190 countries attending this week’s general assembly. Coveney is due to address the assembly on Saturday.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
All the money is going to the Children’s Hospital, though the HSE will deny that.
@Chin Feeyin: primary care has its own budget funding HCPs has always been a nightmare. They should be auditing every package in the country to see if hours are still needed.
Maybe that’s why my father in-law of 90 years of age was refused home help, even though the district nurse put it in as urgently needed
I see the amount of money they waste daily and I can tell you with a small amount of initiative theyd save billions but the top brass could care less
I’m sure Simon Harris with his vast amount of experience in the field of health will sort this out in a flash. We should feel confident that such a giant political figure is top man at the HSE.
@Gus Sheridan: He is such a powerful performer that he never even had to hold down a real job in his life. How amazing is that?!
the audacity of elderly people hoping for some assistance after working and contributing through some of the most lean times in irish history those who tightened their belts while their leaders bought their shirts in paris and danced ring a rosie with the cassock clad soldiers of evil how dare they look for comfort or care …
That’s very little to spend on home are a year ,that’s ONLY €338 a YEAR ie 0.92cent a DAY!
Meanwhile Ireland spends over €14m a DAY on National Debt servicing,….€583,333 an HOUR!If FG fought to get a better deal from Troika in 2011 as Prof Mody said they could have done then we ‘d have alot more to spend in public services,etc!
I have a friend who is 91, lives alone, and waiting for a home care package. She is vulnerable and at risk. Her extended family helps at random times but she has always been independent and finds it difficut to be in a position to need assistance.
If you vote for FFG you will only get more of this
have your say