Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

DPA/PA Images

Smoking bans make married people happier than anyone else

Married women with children reported the largest increase in well-being.

WHEN THE UK followed Ireland’s lead and banned smoking in bars and restaurants, it was touted as a physical health measure.

After all, according to the World Health Organisation, smoking is directly linked to 6 million deaths every year worldwide leading to diseases like cancer, chest infections, strokes and heart attacks.

But when the practice was forbidden in public spaces in 2006 in Scotland and in 2007 in England, people saw a bump in all kinds of well being.

A study led by Dr Eugenio Zucchelli of Lancaster University looked at people’s own assessments of their psychological well-being both before and after the introduction of the bans in Scotland and England using a quasi-experimental design.

The researchers analysed data from the British Household Panel Survey to estimate the impact of the bans on the self-reported wellbeing of smokers, occasional smokers and non smokers, whether single or in a couple.

Dr Eugenio Zucchelli said: “We find that public smoking bans appear to have a statistically significant short-term positive impact on the well-being of married individuals, especially among women with dependent children.”

Married women with children reported the largest increase in well-being following the smoking bans but there was no comparable increase for married men with children.

But why women who have children? Dr Zucchelli posits one theory:

“Individuals with altruistic preferences towards their children would benefit more from the introduction of public smoking bans than non-altruistic parents, mainly for the expected reduction of their children’s exposure to second hand smoke, at least in public places.

“Overall, our findings appear to suggest that the welfare impact of public smoking bans should not be limited solely to smokers but could also be extended to partners and family members of smokers.”

Read: Duterte imposes public smoking ban in Philippines

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
12 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Bill
    Favourite Bill
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 7:25 AM

    Vast majority of the population have no say in the makeup of the Seanad shut it down .

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean O'Sullivan
    Favourite Sean O'Sullivan
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 7:08 AM

    Reform me arse! Shut it down!

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute FlopFlipU
    Favourite FlopFlipU
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 7:26 AM

    If there were imperfections in the system why were they not ironed out by now ,did it suit to have them there .It,s jobs for the boy,s I think -put them on half pay like the rest of the working people and see
    how many of them turn up

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Itiswhatitis
    Favourite Itiswhatitis
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 7:36 AM

    If we could see value . They are just a talking house with no power . The Dail can listen or ignore recommendations. The seante should have the ability to veto and block things.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Godblessthecraic
    Favourite Godblessthecraic
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 7:39 AM

    I can’t wait to vote for its abolition, that’s if Fine Gael keep their election promise……..they wouldn’t lie to get into power would they??

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute gerbreen
    Favourite gerbreen
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 8:05 AM

    The Seanad has offered little to its citizens for many a year. Reform is not on the agenda as far as the referendum is concerned and has been frowned upon for years. Like the Dail it has a small number of successful people in the real world but they are too few in number and restricted by the whip. Unless I have been missing all these great successes of the upper house – I will be voting for its removal

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Itiswhatitis
    Favourite Itiswhatitis
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 7:20 AM

    If I could see value I would be in favour however since FG got in no real change has happened so shut the place down.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Campbell
    Favourite John Campbell
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 8:10 AM

    Sorry, Senators Quinn and Zappone nice try but the people will not fall for it. Starting debate about changing the Senate is simply a smoke screen to hide the obvious which is that we simply cannot afford it and it serves little purpose save to award political ‘friends’ or groom prospective TDs. I note the proposal is for an ‘in house’ vote to make the change with the citizenry allowed no say. A straight yes or no vote in a referendum will do nicely thank you .

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Oisín Ó HAlmhain
    Favourite Oisín Ó HAlmhain
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 8:41 AM

    Perhaps the fact that the Seanad is used as a consolation prize by some people, and a place to raise profile and become TDs is part of the problem.
    If all seanad nominations had to be in before any Dáil General Election, and no sitting senator was allowed run for the Dáil, then the Seanad might have more respect.

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Scott
    Favourite John Scott
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 9:43 AM

    there has been lots of reports sitting some where in the big house on REFORM. so SENATORS Quinn Zappone may be u should have a read of them. now get rid if this house an use all 65000e that u all get put it to some good.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alan Burke
    Favourite Alan Burke
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 7:34 AM

    There are more than enough TDs and high ranking civil servants to oversee the tasks outlined above. The Seanad has no place in our political system and should be abolished.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Geraldine Lee
    Favourite Geraldine Lee
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 7:10 AM

    Shitheads

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Irish Mule
    Favourite Irish Mule
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 12:50 PM

    Can’t wait till this retirement home is shut down.

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tom Brennan
    Favourite Tom Brennan
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 1:02 PM

    I read it like this “Seanad, …., blah blah, drone on about constitution, waffle, more sh!te talk, blah blah, here is my pay cheque thanks to you taxpayers…”

    Shut the bloody thing down – simples.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Scarr
    Favourite Scarr
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 9:44 AM

    I’d like to see the Seanad shut down to make way for an innovation fund – one project fully funded for up to 4 years on Seanad money. Project would eventually have to be self funding. or We could start a entrepreneurialism course in school, or programming or product design. Much better uses of money.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian O'Sullivan
    Favourite Brian O'Sullivan
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 10:46 AM

    We can’t abolish the Seanad without seeing some real reform of the Dáil as well. It’s already too easy for the Government to railroad legislation through the Dáil thanks to the whip system, and removing the Seanad will make that even easier.

    If the Government set out their proposals for real reform of the Dáil before the referendum and put mechanisms in places that assure those reforms WILL go through once the Seanad is removed, then I’ll consider voting yes. Until then, I’m voting no, because I just don’t trust the Government being left completely to their own devices to do what’s best for the country.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute tax slave
    Favourite tax slave
    Report
    May 17th 2013, 3:38 PM

    For a small country we are to top heavy . . Too many chiefs not enough Indians .

    3
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds