Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
ONE OF IRELAND’S biggest developers is bringing the national planning body to the High Court in a bid to get its plans for a massive Wicklow housing project back on track.
The legal case, initiated by the Cosgrave Property Group, is in relation to a 650-home development near the Fassaroe and Monastery area of Wicklow.
The property firm first applied two years ago to build the project, which would include 390 apartments and 268 houses and a ‘neighbourhood centre’ made up of a convenience store, six retail units, a crèche, a park and a new pedestrian and cycle bridge.
Cosgrave Property Group secured planning permission from Wicklow council in the middle of last year, but several complainants appealed this decision to An Bord Pleanála.
At the end of 2017, An Bord Pleanála overturned the decision by the local council and refused the Cosgrave Property Group planning permission.
According to court documents filed recently, the property firm has appealed for a High Court judicial review of the decision by the national planning body.
Click here to view a larger version.
Complaints
When it approved the project, Wicklow council said the development was in line with its masterplan to build up to 1,800 extra housing units in the northern half of the county.
However, the Bray Clay Pigeon Club and several other residents living near the development site voiced concerns about the project.
The club, which has 50 full-time members, said it has rented land in the Fassaroe area for four decades and claimed the Cosgrave group’s project would be “detrimental” to the organisation.
In its submission, it noted the organisation has “thrived” in the area due to the lack of housing. If Cosgrave’s development got the all-clear, the club said, new residents would likely object to the club’s noisy practice ground.
When it announced its ruling, An Bord Pleanála gave several reasons for its decision to overturn the previous planning permission.
It said the scale of the retail aspect of the development would be “significantly in excess of the needs of the proposed local residents” and could have a negative impact on the established retail trade in nearby town centres like Bray.
An Bord Pleanála also highlighted that the housing project would not be sufficiently serviced by public transport and, as a result, the number of cars in the area would likely increase significantly.
The decision to reject the project comes at a time when Ireland is plagued by a chronic shortage of housing – an issue that could persist for the next 10 years.
Written by Killian Woods and posted on Fora.ie
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Is it just me or is the headline a tad ambiguous? I read the headline to mean reasons as to why victims should drop cases rather than reasons as to why the DPP wasn’t proceeding with a prosecution.
Exactly !
The DPP has had her budget cut, while her office has had to deal with more files. Telling complainants (or the emotional loaded term victims) that their evidence wouldn’t be accepted as credible, or that the prosecution would not be in the public interest, is fairly low on the priority list.
Divert some of the funding devoted to defending the criminal ..such as repeated free legal aid and problem solved. Easy !
Now your talking Michael. My 9yr old went through he’ll & back, case wasn’t passed. No reason & no victims support for him. Maybe get rid of flat screen tv’s & state of d art gyms from prisons & put money into DPP or funding for victims support.
That’s crap, they write to tell you case wasn’t passed so surly a couple of more sentences with the reasons as to why would not be costly
have your say