Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
A SCANDAL HAS been brewing over the past few days involving social media giant Facebook, data-driven political campaign firm Cambridge Analytica which was part of Trump’s 2016 election campaign push.
It’s a complex story, but one that’s becoming more and more important, mostly because it concerns people’s Facebook data. It’s because of Cambridge Analytica, for example, that Facebook shares tumbled by 5% in early trading today.
It’s also raised a debate about how far voters can/should be influenced, as Cambridge Analytica is a company that offers its services to those who want to “change audience behaviour” in the context of elections, referendums, and other important political events.
What’s kicked all this off?
On Saturday, the Observer published an interview with Christopher Wylie, a whistleblower who claims to have built the “psychological warfare tool” used in Trump’s election win. Among the information divulged by Wylie, was that 50 million Facebook profiles had been harvested through the app, thisisyourdigitallife, which offered a personality prediction test, describing itself on Facebook as “a research app used by psychologists.”
Some 270,000 people downloaded the app, allowing Kogan to access information such as the city listed on their profile, or content they had “liked”.
“However, the app also collected the information of the test-takers’ Facebook friends, leading to the accumulation of a data pool tens of millions-strong,” the Observer reported.
Wylie said that the information taken included status updates, comments, likes and sometimes even people’s private messages.
“It is a full-service propaganda machine,” he said.
According to the New York Times and Britain’s Observer, the company took information to help them design software to predict and influence voters’ choices at the ballot box.
Facebook responded by suspending the account of Cambridge Analytica.
Also suspended were the accounts of its parent organisation, Strategic Communication Laboratories, as well as those of University of Cambridge psychologist Aleksandr Kogan and Wylie.
The incident is being called the tech giant’s biggest-ever data breach.
The EU said the data breach was “horrifying” and Europe must do everything to protect its own citizens.
EU Justice Commissioner Vera Jourova said she would seek clarification from Facebook about the reports in the Observer and the New York Times when she visits the US this week.
Who has worked with CA?
The company has worked on political campaigns in countries including Kenya, Colombia, and India, according to the Guardian.
The company’s CEO Alexander Nix has denied that his firm worked for campaigners for the Brexit leave vote, although this has been hotly disputed by the co-founder of Leave.EU, Arron Banks.
Thomas Borwick, who used to work for CA, set up his own company Kanto, which was hired by Irish anti-abortion group according to the Times (Ireland edition). Kanto was also linked to the Brexit Leave campaign.
What has CA said?
In a statement on Twitter, CA reacted to the story from the Observer and the New York Times:
Reality Check: Cambridge Analytica uses client and commercially and publicly available data; we don’t use or hold any Facebook data.
When we learned GSR sold us Facebook data that it shouldn’t have done, we deleted it all – system wide audit to verify.
GSR is short for Global Science Research, whose co-founder Joseph Chancellor is working for Facebook as an in-house psychologist. More on them from the Guardian here.
CA did not use any Facebook data for the 2016 Trump campaign.
“Mr. Wylie is a former contractor for, not a founder of CA. He is the subject of restraining undertakings to prevent misuse of the company’s intellectual property.”
Advertising is not coercive; people are smarter than that.
It added that Obama’s 2008 campaign was “famously” data-driven, pioneered microtargeting in 2012, “talking to people specifically based on the issues they care about”.
This isn’t a spy movie. We’re a data analytics company doing research & analysis on commercial, public and data sets for clients
“CA works for brands and political parties from across the political mainstream in democratic elections.”
- with reporting from AFP
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Drink good me drink when young me no problem
Never done me any harm, hard to know what to believe thesedays
@Jonny: “did” and “these days”
@Jonny: clearly it has though, thanks for proving the point
@Yzo Sirrius: Quality
@Jonny: should be Johnny not Jonny
@Barry Somers: weirdo
@Yzo Sirrius: grammar nazi are we
@Figo murphy: I know how my own name is spelt.. Shouldn’t you be doing something more productive with your time than posting ridiculous comments like this
@Jonny: ah bless, too much booze as a teen I’d say.
How are they still able to mess with monkeys like that?
@Stephen Small: You just get them drunk and they’ll let you do anything.
I would suggest teenagers who drink regularly to excess would have a lower level of brain activity before they started drinking
I not think that drink harm brain me ok
Ah so that’s what’s wrong with me brain!!
Ahhhh Jonny
That explains everything.
No bottle or can health warnings, no education, no penalties for underage drinking, no support for those who become addicted.
I could never become an alcoholic after what I saw it do to relatives. Meanwhile my friends never shut up about how funny and grand drink it. Oh well …
So everyone in Mediterranean Europe has stunted brain growth? After all most of those countries have a culture of drinking wine with meals from an early age.
have your say