Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/EvgeniiAnd

Babies can distinguish difference between vocal and facial emotion

The ability of babies to differentiate emotional expressions appears to develop during their first six months.

SIX-MONTH-OLD babies are able to connect both visual and auditory information to recognise emotions.

That’s according to a new study based on research from the University of Geneva (UNIGE), Switzerland.

Scientists measured the ability of six-month-old babies to make a connection between a voice (expressing happiness or anger) and the emotional expression on a face (again, of happiness or anger).

They found that babies look at an angry face – especially the mouth – for longer if they have previously heard a happy a voice.

This reaction to something new demonstrates for the first time that babies have an early ability to transfer emotional information from the auditory mode to the visual.

Babies can distinguish happiness from other expressions which suggests they possess early skills for differentiating between emotions.

Twenty-four 6-month-old babies were exposed to voices and faces expressing the emotions of happiness and anger and eye-tracking technology was used to measure the babies eye movements with great precision.

In the first phases the babies faced a black screen and listened to a neutral, happy or angry voice for 20 seconds.

In the second stage, the babies were placed in front of two emotional faces, one expressing happiness and the other anger.

The research team were then able to determine whether the time spent looking at one or other of the emotional faces – or specific areas of the face (the mouth or eyes) – varied according to the voice they listened to.

If the babies looked equally at both faces, it would not be possible to conclude that there was a difference.

Amaya Palama, a researcher at the Laboratory of Sensorimotor, Affective and Social Development in UNIGE’s Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences said, “On the other hand, if they clearly looked at one of them much longer, we could state that they are able to spot a difference between the two faces.”

The results of the study revealed that six-month-olds did not have a preference for either of the emotional faces if they had already heard a neutral voice or a voice expressing anger.

On the other hand, they spent longer looking at the face expressing anger – especially its mouth – after hearing a voice expressing happiness.

This visual preference for novelty shows babies ability to transfer emotional information about happiness from the auditory to the visual mode.

The findings were published in the journal PLOS ONE.

Close
12 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cal Mooney
    Favourite Cal Mooney
    Report
    Oct 26th 2011, 12:52 PM

    Emm, who is the woman in this photo …

    ‘ A mock Presidential debate at Assumption Secondary School, Walkinstown. We think it’s mock. Image:’

    She looks nothing like the woman in any of the posters running for president… Is it Dana ?

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ryan Murphy
    Favourite Ryan Murphy
    Report
    Oct 26th 2011, 2:59 PM

    Looks like the real Seanie is gone to ground-was supposed to be on local radio today, but on mature reflection, decided against it.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ryan Murphy
    Favourite Ryan Murphy
    Report
    Oct 26th 2011, 3:20 PM

    I gather he subsequently did the interview-I blame Pat Kenny for not updating me!

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ray
    Favourite Ray
    Report
    Oct 26th 2011, 1:09 PM

    Would help if the picture of Mary Davis was in focus.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Diarmuid Donoghue
    Favourite Diarmuid Donoghue
    Report
    Oct 26th 2011, 5:10 PM

    cheers,might just get the eyes looked at.her poster does look well from a distance….hmmm

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Diarmuid Donoghue
    Favourite Diarmuid Donoghue
    Report
    Oct 26th 2011, 1:21 PM

    Would it Ray?seem a bit defensive,are you a davis fan??must admit her posters, she looks well in them. Will you be giving her your number 1 tomorrow, ray ;-)

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ray
    Favourite Ray
    Report
    Oct 26th 2011, 3:25 PM

    Yes it would Diarmuid. No I am not of fan of Davis. I am a fan of standards in photojournalism, however. If you think she looks well in the posters, then you need to address the focus issue you have with your eyes. Michael D will get my vote, as he is the only one fit to represent the Irish people.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Claire Thomas
    Favourite Claire Thomas
    Report
    Oct 26th 2011, 10:52 PM

    Please watch this :)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhgLTp_e9Kk

    Vote Martin McGuinness No 1 for a President who will shake up the greedy politicians & their cronies…

    2
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel