Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
SKY NEWS HAS admitted to twice hacking into the email accounts of members of the public – but say that it stands by its decision to do so.
In a statement released today by head of Sky News, John Ryley, the broadcaster said the actions were editorially justified and in the public interest.
However, it added that it was “acutely aware of the tensions that can arise between the law and responsible investigative journalism”.
Ryley outlined the two cases in which a journalist was authorised to hack into the emails of members of the public.
In 2008, Sky News met with Cleveland Police and provided them with emails offering new information relevant to Anne Darwin’s defence. Darwin’s husband, known as “canoe man”, had faked his own death as part of an insurance fraud.
Material provided by the broadcaster was used in the successful prosecution and the police made clear after the trial that this information was pivotal to the case.
Mrs Darwin was convicted and received a jail sentence of six and a half years. Over half a million pounds were also recovered and returned to insurance companies and pension funds.
The journalist who uncovered the fraud had asked permission from his editors to access the accounts as he suspected they were being used by the Darwins to communicate after his “death”. In a second statement, issued as a retort to a Guardian article, Sky said none of the material obtained was broadcast prior to the conviction and its coverage made clear that it had discovered and supplied emails to the police.
Ryley said the decisions to hack into the mails were not taken lightly, nor is the practice frequent.
They require finely balanced judgement based on individual circumstances and must always be subjected to the proper editorial controls.
In the first statement, separate investigations were also highlighted.
A Sky News journalist bought an Uzi machine gun in 2004 to highlight the easy availability of illegal weapons in the UK. On another occasion, our reporter penetrated airside security at Heathrow in 2003 to highlight failings in the system. These investigations serve the public interest and are a legitimate part of responsible journalism.
Sky News said that in light of the recent phone hacking scandal and “heightened interest in editorial practices”, it has commissioned an external review of email records and an internal audit of payments.
No grounds for concern have been found so far, said Ryley.
Refuting the Guardian’s article which outlined that intercepting emails is against the law and no public interest defence is written into legislation, Sky said “some of the most important stories have involved breaking the rules in some way”.
For example, the Daily Telegraph’s exposé of the MPs’ expenses scandal was very clearly in the public interest, but only happened because the newspaper took the decision to pay for stolen data. They have been widely applauded – deservedly – for doing so.
Sky said it is in agreement with the BBC about how there are certain occasion in which it is acceptable to break the law in pursuit of a story in the public interest.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
What a country Ireland is at last growing into to. Its starting to mature at last… Excellent idea
Its about time Irish heroes who fought in the great war, world war 2 and other wars for foreign armies, namely the British army are remembered. Credit has to be given to Myles Dungan and Kevin Myers for their continuous writing on this topic over the years and of course Mary McAleese for the fantastic work she did in her time as president.
There was great economic pressure at the time of this recruitment, jobs were scare and people thought that the war would be short, It was a bit of an adventure for a lot of them. Unfortunately it did not turn out like that and the Irish suffered the greatest proportion of fatalities per capita of any people in the allied forces. They were treated as cannon fodder, there was nothing noble or heroic about being ordered out in your thousands to climb up a sea cliff while thousands of Ottoman soldiers shoot at you or charging across a bare field at German artillery. I certainly feel pity for them and how they were used. Like Ireland at the time, most of the men from the south in uniform were pro independence and freedom. Some were not, several of the RIC men that opened up on Bloody Sunday had done their service at the front in WW1. Countless men in the IRA, like the great Tom Barry had fought for years in WW1. My own Grand Uncle fought in WW1 and brought back weapons and grenades for my Grand Father’s IRA unit.
There is nothing heroic in dying in mud at the hands of an enemy miles away in your thousands for a side that had no trouble with you going over first but nor do I despise them. Money was tight, jobs scare and the pressure to join up was massive. I’m just sad that they died the way they did, same as if they had fought for the Czar or the Kaiser.
cannon fodder is all the Irish were in the trenches!!
Indeed and a poignant point was that Unionist regiments and Nationalist regiments were both seen as Irish by the British colonels and used for first waves attacks.
A man from Galway or from East Belfast was viewed as just as useful as stopping a German bullet, whatever flag he doodled in letters home.
Bloody nonsense…
“how Irishmen were recruited into British Forces… ” I really get fed up with this lazy post independence language that suggests the irish were dragged into some foreign army. We, like the English, Welsh and Scots simply joined THE Army.
have your say