Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Cody Wilson shows the first completely 3D-printed handgun called The Liberator.

US judge blocks release of 3D gun blueprints amid uproar

The weapons can be manufactured using 3D printers and lack traceable serial numbers.

A US JUDGE has temporarily blocked the online publication of blueprints for 3D-printed firearms, in a last-ditch effort to stop a settlement President Donald Trump’s administration had reached with the company releasing the digital documents.

Eight states and the District of Columbia, which houses the capital Washington, had filed a lawsuit against the federal government, calling its settlement with Texas-based Defense Distributed “arbitrary and capricious”.

The Trump administration had settled a five-year legal fight by permitting the company to publish its website Defcad — which founder Cody Wilson envisioned as a WikiLeaks for homemade firearms called “ghost guns”.

Those weapons can be manufactured using 3D printers or personal steel mills, and lack traceable serial numbers. At least one of the guns can also be made from plastic, which is virtually invisible to metal detectors.

US District Judge Robert Lasnik in Seattle, Washington granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order blocking the release of the digital plans, and scheduled a hearing for 10 August.

In a written statement, New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood, one of plaintiffs, called the ruling “a major victory for common sense and public safety”.

“As we argued in the suit we filed yesterday, it is — simply — crazy to give criminals the tools to build untraceable, undetectable 3D printed guns at the touch of a button. Yet that’s exactly what the Trump administration decided to allow.”

As uproar mounted, the White House expressed scepticism over the legality of Wilson’s efforts, even though the administration had green-lighted the project.

Trump weighed in on Twitter, revealing that he had spoken to America’s main pro-gun lobby, the National Rifle Association, about the topic.

“I am looking into 3-D Plastic Guns being sold to the public,” the president said. “Already spoke to NRA, doesn’t seem to make much sense!”

White House spokesman Hogan Gidley expanded on the president’s comments last night, telling reporters: “It is currently illegal to own or make a wholly plastic gun of any kind — including those made on a 3D printer. The administration supports this nearly two-decade old law.”

Twenty-three Democratic senators later introduced a bill designed to block the publication of 3D printable firearm blueprints.

‘I intend to litigate’

Wilson remained defiant and vowed to fight in court. He told Wired magazine that he is facing legal action from “at least 21 state attorneys general” who have cited a risk to public safety.

“I intend to litigate,” he told the magazine. “Americans have the unquestionable right to share this information.”

The self-proclaimed “crypto-anarchist” also made the digital blueprints available online earlier than the Wednesday launch date he had previously announced.

AFP was able to download two files from the website on Tuesday, though it had some technical glitches and was difficult to access. The site had 10 firearms and weapons components with downloadable digital files.

US Release Of 3D-Printed Gun Software Blocked The first completely 3D-printed handgun called The Liberator. Austin American-Statesman / TNS/ABACA Austin American-Statesman / TNS/ABACA / TNS/ABACA

Wilson, a law school dropout who has taken up the cause of allowing unfettered information online without government interference, contends that the US Constitution’s Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to bear arms, should extend to a person’s right to make their own guns.

His legal team has argued that any move to prevent the distribution of the blueprints would run counter to the “foundational principles of free speech”.

But federal courts have disagreed. Before the settlement with the Trump administration, Wilson had lost in both district and appellate court. The US Supreme Court had declined to take up his case.

Politicians, gun control advocates and law enforcement had expressed concerns that Defcad’s files would allow anyone — from a teen to a convicted felon — to make dangerous weapons.

Global problem

But while Wilson has somehow become the public face of homemade weapons technology, the phenomenon of “ghost guns” is bigger than his website alone.

Earlier in July, Los Angeles police showcased an arsenal of such weapons seized from gang members during a six-month undercover operation.

The firearms, including AR-15-style semi-automatic rifles, were fashioned from kits purchased online, according to police. Wilson’s website also features blueprints for the AR-15.

Over the last five years, Wilson’s Defense Distributed has grown to 15 employees inside a non-descript warehouse in the Texas state capital Austin.

They have created a plastic 3D-printable handgun called the “Liberator,” a machine called the “Ghost Gunner” with which homemade metal gun parts can be constructed, and amassed other digital gun files.

Jonathan Lowy of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence told AFP that if Wilson’s website is ultimately allowed to publish, the consequences could be even greater outside of the US.

“It’s certainly a huge international problem, particularly given that many other countries have much stronger gun laws than in America,” Lowy said.

“So, in those countries, there are many people who shouldn’t have guns and could not get them unless they can get their hands on a 3D-printed gun.”

© AFP 2018 

Author
View 44 comments
Close
44 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ciaran MacAoidh
    Favourite Ciaran MacAoidh
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 2:58 PM

    So, have the government started stealing your babies yet, or were Waters, Quinn and O’Brien wrong again?

    80
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Martin Bishop
    Favourite Martin Bishop
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 3:06 PM

    Course they were wrong, sure any sane person knew they were talking out their backsides

    48
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute cooperguy
    Favourite cooperguy
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 3:21 PM

    No they are too busy enforcing the mandatory abortions from the abortion legislation to get around to stealing the babies

    40
    See 6 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rkmr
    Favourite Rkmr
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 3:35 PM

    The legislation hasn’t been put in place yet. The referendum was passed but nothing in the constitution has changed yet.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emily Elephant
    Favourite Emily Elephant
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 3:44 PM

    To be fair, the anti-referendum campaign could also ask whether the Irish state’s protection of children has improved. A third alternative is that it was a big pointless vanity project.

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Richie Rodgers
    Favourite Richie Rodgers
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 4:45 PM

    Can we insist on the High Court awarding costs against this petitioner as this was a gross insult to jurisprudence as the woman produced no evidence to support her claim.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kerry Blake
    Favourite Kerry Blake
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 5:50 PM

    Read the article again Richie and you might understand it. Are you suggesting that only those with a 100% chance of winning their case should approach the courts? Sounds very elitist to me an attempt to limit peoples rights to avail of court services.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Roche
    Favourite Paul Roche
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 6:17 PM

    Whistleblowing will be the problem.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ian Cuneyt Cakir Foley
    Favourite Ian Cuneyt Cakir Foley
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 7:51 PM

    Remind me, did the govt ministers who sanctioned the ultra vires booklet pay the costs in the mccrystal case or pay back the public money wasted on the booklet?

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jazz O'Gorman
    Favourite Jazz O'Gorman
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 2:46 PM

    What an absolute waste of court time, the judge should have jailed her for contempt.

    62
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Rebecca eaton
    Favourite Rebecca eaton
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 4:05 PM

    Oh yes of course because she is wrong? The yes vote was pushed more then the no vote and the government don’t give a dame children in Ireland don’t have a voice and never ever will.

    21
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Deasun Mac An Choiligh
    Favourite Deasun Mac An Choiligh
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 6:27 PM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I0OiNdj2aP4 , “There is no system ever devised by mankind that is guaranteed to rip husband and wife or father, mother and child apart so bitterly than our present Family Court System.” Judge Brian Lindsay, Retired Supreme Court Judge

    11
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Roche
    Favourite Paul Roche
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 7:55 PM

    Oh Rosemary!

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Carcu Sidub
    Favourite Carcu Sidub
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 3:27 PM

    So onto the Supreme Court?

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute tom
    Favourite tom
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 3:19 PM

    Doesn’t seem justice was servered as supreme court had previously ruled the campaign was baised and unfair.

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Carcu Sidub
    Favourite Carcu Sidub
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 4:01 PM

    The High Court appear to say any referendum campain run by the Government of the day can indeed be biast and unfair as long as being biast and unfair does not have an affect on the result. This appears to overule the McKenna judgment.

    However the Supreme Court says the Government campin on the childrens referendum was biast and unfair but did not make a judgment on if being biast and unfair had an affect on the result.

    So I guess we will never know unless this decision is appealed to the Supreme Court.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kerry Blake
    Favourite Kerry Blake
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 4:09 PM

    More to the point when are FG and labour going to pay back the €2 million of tax payers money they misused during the referendum?

    15
    See 3 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Richie Rodgers
    Favourite Richie Rodgers
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 4:44 PM

    Kerry
    I think you may find that the Government cannot be equated to a Political Party or Parties in terms of any errors it may have committed in their day to day roles. On the basis of your logic we should also ask the Roman Catholic Church for a contribution as well since most of the Members of Government were also of that faith and sure why not include the GAA while we’re at it!
    Given that the above is apparently good legal advice will you now give it a rest Kerry?

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Kerry Blake
    Favourite Kerry Blake
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 5:39 PM

    2 government parties were found to have misused Irish tax payers money in a referendum. I tell you what Richie when they pay that money back I’ll give it a rest. How about a bit of accountability from Enda and Eamon?

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Caroline Hughes
    Favourite Caroline Hughes
    Report
    Oct 18th 2013, 9:18 PM

    Tom is quite right, the government are in the wrong-they always are!

    2
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds