Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
ONE OF DAVID Hockney’s famous “pool paintings” is coming to auction and is expected to sell in the million range, easily breaking the record for a work by a living artist sold at auction.
The British artist’s Portrait of an Artist (Pool with Two Figures), to be auctioned at Christie’s in November, is considered one of his premier works. Christie’s has estimated the work at about $80 million, but says it expects it to sell for more.
The previous record for a work by a living artist was set by Jeff Koons’ Balloon Dog, which sold for $58.4 million in 2013.
The 1972 painting by Hockney, now 81, is “the holy grail of his paintings, from both the historical and the market perspectives,” said Alex Rotter, co-chairman of post-war and contemporary art at Christie’s.
He noted that it reflects both the European and the American perspectives of an artist who came to live in California in the ’60s, and saw himself as living on both continents.
“It has all the elements that you would want in a Hockney painting,” Rotter said in an interview.
The California landscape, the beautiful trees and flowers and the sky, and then what we know him most for, which is the pool.
He noted that writers have referred to the swimming pool itself as being sort of a self-portrait of Hockney, though he never confirmed that, just saying he was fascinated to paint moving water.
The painting has been held by a private collector, and “we have been trying to get it for a very long time,” Rotter said.
A depiction of two men — one swimming the breaststroke underwater, the other standing by the pool looking down — the painting was originally inspired, according to background provided by Christie’s, by two photographs Hockney found juxtaposed on his studio floor, one of a swimmer in Hollywood in 1966, and another of a boy staring at something on the ground.
The standing figure is said to represent Peter Schlesinger, whom the artist met in 1966, when the younger man was a student in one of Hockney’s art classes at UCLA. For the next five years, according to Christie’s, he was both “the great love of Hockney’s life” and one of his favourite models.
The relationship ended in 1971. Hockney had already begun the painting and he abandoned it, starting again the following year.
Record
The upcoming sale, Rotter said, “will definitely be a record for David Hockney at auction. And with Mr. Hockney one of the last of his generation still standing, and also painting, this painting will likely be the most expensive work by a living artist sold at auction.”
But who will buy an $80 million painting?
“It will be someone who wants the best painting of an artist,” Rotter said, “and the best painting of an artist with historical relevance.”
He added: “Wherever it ends up, I can tell you it will be surrounded by other top works of the 20th century.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
I didn’t need to read that I read the headline….. pay up.
@John Hayes: Here’s me after reading the whole article agreeing with you John..
@Paul Gorry: sorry Paul I never jump in but unfortunately this is one of those times. These people have suffered enough.
@John Hayes: absolutely agree with you John.
@John Hayes: Agree 100%
@John Hayes: Show me the MONEY!
Whilst everyone can agree that the survivors should be looked after mentally and financially I do not believe that it should be paid for by the state. It was not the state that sent them into these institutions and it was not the state that ran them. The church got away with paying all of the money into the redress funds for what they did to children and so now must be held solely liable for any financial cost these survivors.
@lorcmulv: Even here in Germany it is well known that the church and the Irish Government were in this together. The state financed it while the church executed it. And yes…. lets not forget the ordinary people. They facilitated it with their shame
@lorcmulv: I agree, additionally it was men who got them pregnant and deserted them. They are liable, as are their own families who put them in their. The church is responsible for the bad treatment but not the state
@lorcmulv: I agree, additionally it was men who got them pregnant and deserted them. They are liable, as are their own families who put them in their. The church is responsible for the bad treatment but not the state government
@lorcmulv:The state knew what was going on and did not do anything about it.So church and state to blame.
@Johannes Baader: They would not have; ‘Shame’ but because of the Catholic Church , Church made the community ashamed of having a Girl among them having a Baby, outside wedlock. The Catholic Church ruled through fear, and shame, and naming people from the altar, after this; a person so shamed would loose their job, and not get work anymore in that community of Fear. The founder of Christianity Jesus was merciful and loving, he knew what it was like to be marginalized he was rejected, his mother Mary Conceived Jesus outside Wedlock, she would have experienced Fear in that situation until Joseph Married her.
Growing up in such a Community the Mother would have to depend on the charity of those people influenced by the Catholic Church. I am so glad they no longer have that control of minds.
@lorcmulv: whilst I see your point and agree on some level, personally I would struggle to separate or disentangle church from state with particular reference to the 1940’s through to the 1980’s. In recent decades the stranglehold of the church on Irish people has dissipated significantly, but for me there is no way that a nation of people so heavily cowed by the power of the Catholic God almighty, so mired and immersed in the fear and shame that breaking Gods holy rule brought, could be governed independent of Church involvement or influence
@Tom’s: and it was the men that got them pregnant in first place so why not sue sue the descendants of these men – that is the same as making the current taxpayer pay for what happened over 50 years ago.
It’s time the catholic church sold off their enormous property portfolio and paid up. Happy Easter boys!
@merely ed: we live in hope merely.
@Paul Gorry: They were poor mouthing the other day about money not coming in.
@David Corrigan: I find it funny that they can come out and have the poor mouth, when their boss in room literally sits on a gold throne, with more security to protect him than Biden does as US president, I mean they literally have their own city and complain cos covid has cut back on the collection plate….id say if they even sold off a third of their assets in Ireland they could pay victims, be sorted during covid and still have money left over for a new car
@merely ed: Dr Michael Woods of Fianna Fail signed a legal agreement with the Catholic Church to limit its liability and commit Irish taxpayers to pay all the bills. If any other Gov did a deal like that to cover up the abuse of innocents there would be public outcry, police investigations and jail for the corrupt. Irish people prefer to not know.
@David Corrigan: Pope asking for the Cardinals to take a pay cut from their Salary Of; € 5,000 a month.
What about them asking their own families who put them there – for compensation? The families and the church were in cahoots.
What about the men who got them pregnant and abandoned these women and their children. They are liable, not the state.
@Bleurgh: I am adopted. The church and the state contributed to my community’s mistreatment. The fact that government depts like the dept of foreign affairs organised so many passports for children to be trafficked, that it was reported on in national, US and German newspapers, is evidence alone that the State was directly involved.
Also the institution I was in was infamous as being a place where vaccine trials, drug trials and food/formula trials were conducted on us unaccompanied infants, mostly by British pharmaceutical companies and Irish universities. Ultimately whose responsibility was this? As I and other children were ‘wards of the State’, then the Irish State was responsible at the time and remains responsible still for this illegal and unethical experimentation and negligence.
@akaalison: whilst every compassion can be afforded to you as a survivor the brass tacks are that the majority of mothers got pregnant and the fathers wanted no more to do with the mothers of their children and the mothers own family forced them into these institutions out of some sense of shame fuelled by the church. The church ran the institutions and whilst the state had to be involved in some sort of collision – that was the state of government then and to maintain that the current taxpayer is solely financially liable is not fair or reasonable. A way should be found to make the families that put these women and children into these homes pay, as well as the fathers along with the church who ran the homes pay the majority of any financial costs.
@lorcmulv: so you can afford me compassion, but not redress!?!
And no one said “that the current taxpayer is solely financially liable”. The article doesn’t even hint at that.
Anyone responsible including the State, the religious orders, the State inspectors, the Adoption Board, the adoption agencies, the social workers, the private nursing homes, the county councils, the nuns, priests, bishops & archbishops, those who discarded babies & mothers bodies, the medical schools who used bodies as cadavers, the TD’s, the pharmaceutical companies, the universities, the hospitals, the deceptive medics (DeValera), the staff of institutions, the aircraft carriers who trafficked the ‘Banished Babies’.
ALL who were responsible &/or were complicit by doing nothing should be held accountable
…finally!
The state should pay some compensation and fully acknowledge the disgraceful atrocities that occurred at the mother and baby homes, but the pressure should be put on religious orders to pay up for not just this but other disgraceful acts they have been found to have been involved in…..and if they don’t do it, either start taking them and use the money to pay the compensation via the state or send in CAB and seize assets to sell off
FG/FF allowed this infanticide and slave labour to happen, for around 80 years.
So while the state oversaw this, it is the Church wealth that should be repossessed to compensate as they had a stranglehold on “Catholic Ireland” with their ‘purity’ views from a ‘holy’ book filled with atrocities.
Trials, repossessions and disband them.
Shame on the Roman Catholic Church & Government of the day. The Catholic Church can’t step any lower in the eyes of many people. The Catholic Church is already selling off property in secret and moving the funds.
Hi, can someone answer this for me please. At the time of the adoptions, were the actions (save for those cases where birth certs were altered) of the authorities/facilitators legal?
@Susan Keane: we don’t know. I’m adopted and am actively prevented knowing most of my info. For example, did my birth mother give informed consent to my adoption? Was I taken from my birth mother before the waiting period for full consent had elapsed? Was my birth mother informed of her entitlement to withdraw her initial consent? Was I forcibly taken or without her choice? Was I used as a guinea pig, unlawfully and unethically in vaccine trials, drug trials and food/formula trials while I was in an institution as ‘a ward of the State’?
Who was charged with my “care” and were they adults. Were they qualified to care for vulnerable children? Was I neglected, abused or did I receive medical attention for an incidents and/or accidents?
And there are MANY, MANY, more questions.
@akaalison: I also was adopted and always wonder about the same questions.And I know I was with my adopted family within around six weeks of my birth when legally you couldn’t adopt a child until the child was at least six months old.
As an adoptee who was in St Patrick’s home, I am deeply, deeply offended by the headline on this article.
What a ro**n headline trying to make survivors look like money grabbers!
The church was responsible for sending women who had their children taken from them, if they weren’t adopted they were placed in orphanages. They didn’t give their consent to have their children used as guinea pigs, no consent was sought from their parents it was illegal, A lot of children were made wards of court by the state, If a child lost a parent the state would take the child/children away from their surviving parent usually their fathers, so the state was responsible for their welfare. The state should compensate them
ask the state to pay, what? ask your real families to pay, they gave u away
have your say