Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
ESB UNION CONNECT is refusing to erase the personal data of its former members after those members requested that it do so in line with the EU’s strict data protection guidelines.
Some hundreds of disgruntled former Connect members have sought for their data to be erased in order that they might join Connect’s sister union Siptu.
The request comes after over 18 months of acrimony between Connect (formerly TEEU – Technical Electrical and Engineering Union) and its members over their perception of the allegedly poor standard of representation the union provided for them during pay talks with the ESB in January 2017.
Some 250 members resigned from Connect from March 2017 and joined Siptu, only to be expelled from that organisation in July 2018 following an objection by Connect.
They are now attempting to rejoin Siptu, but first are seeking confirmation from Connect that they have resigned as its members.
Connect had declined to provide that confirmation, a step which led to each worker mailing the union two weeks ago and requesting that their personal data be erased from its files, both on and offline, in line with the EU’s wide-ranging General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Erased
The reason for this request is that if Connect confirms it has erased those members’ data it will be taken as de facto confirmation that the members have exited the union.
Now, in response to that request, Connect says it will not be erasing those members’ names, dates of birth, membership numbers, details of arrears (if applicable), and joining and leaving dates.
Click her to view a larger image
Under GDPR’s ‘right to be forgotten’ articles, a body must outline a concrete justification for not acceding to a request to erase personal data.
In this case, Connect’s reasoning is twofold:
How the payments in the former point apply to ex-members is unclear. TheJournal.ie spoke to some of those ex-members who said that such payments are not in any way applicable to them.
TheJournal.ie sought comment from Connect regarding this matter. A response had not been received at the time of publication.
A spokesperson for the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) told TheJournal.ie, with regard to the right to be forgotten:
Put simply, the right is not absolute.
Transparency
However, a senior professional source working in the field of data protection said that justification for the non-erasure of personal data under GDPR “must display transparency and accountability, and must deal in situations that will happen, not ones that may happen”.
It’s understood that Connect has recently sought to hold meetings with members and former members around the country in an effort to persuade them to stay with (or rejoin) the union.
It recently emerged that an additional 200 ESB technicians that were originally with Siptu prior to the influx of former TEEU members last year are now intent on leaving that organisation in solidarity with the other workers who were expelled.
However, that move was not expected to happen before a crucial vote on work practices within the company, due to take place in the next month, in order to leave all members entitled to a vote.
Meanwhile, it’s now believed that those negotiations are in fact now in jeopardy due to the ongoing fraught nature of relations between ESB network technicians and Connect, with the company understood to be ‘concerned’ at the ongoing impasse.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
I don’t understand the resistance to let them go. This impedance is very frustrating. Surely they must see that the current is against them. The power lies with the workers. Watt is the problem here? This is just going to generate more problems down the line. I’m going to go meditate…….. Ohmmmmmmmmmmm
All sounds very teamster.
Btw, what’s shadowbanning??
@Greg Blake:
Siptu needs to pylon the pressure and restore power reconnection for those workers.
@Rory J Leonard: Watt?
@Greg Blake:
It’s a residual current thing!
@Michael Kavanagh: power to the people
@Michael Kavanagh: Ohm, now I get it, no resistance from me.
@Rory J Leonard: you’re banned from the interweb
@Greg Blake: I believe it’s when they stop your posts being seen but don’t outright ban you. There’s possible various other functions of Twitter that are restricted but I don’t use Twitter so I’m not sure of the details.
But at least it has sparked interest!
As long as have a legitimate interest in keeping data, store it responsibly and for a defined period, a company is not obliged to delete data on request. They must though be able to justify why not and communicate reason to requestor, who is entitled to make a complaint to regulator if feel justification is not valid
That’s a breach of the new GDPR regulations isn’t it? Sue them
have your say